6a13

General Questions and comments

Moderators: IMC, Club Staff

viper-99
Apprentice
Posts: 21
jedwabna poszewka promocja
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2012 9:34 pm

6a13

Post by viper-99 »

hi guys i am looking to upgrade the 6a12 v6 in my 94 fto to a 6a13 just wanted to know will the motor drop straight in or do i have to stuff around with it
silverGPX
9.5"
Posts: 6793
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 5:00 pm

Re: 6a13

Post by silverGPX »

From what ive heard it drops straight in
User avatar
ZFL45H1
Oldtimer
Posts: 1830
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 6:00 pm
Location: Albury

Re: 6a13

Post by ZFL45H1 »

Best person to ask is bennoz 6a13tt king :lol:
gotta get there one day :)
User avatar
vipfto
Forum Moderator
Posts: 4154
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 5:00 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: 6a13

Post by vipfto »

yeah straight drop in 6A13 no turbo -day job or 6A13tt never ending lol
FTO GR-TURBO
172KW ATW @ 11PSI
User avatar
kiz
SA Coordinator
Posts: 2178
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 10:09 pm
Location: Adelaide, South Australia

Re: 6a13

Post by kiz »

Question is, is it really worth dropping out a 6A12 and putting in a non-turboed 6A13? All for a gain of what average 10kW?

Unless it's replacing a high k engine for a low k. In which case my question is mute
There are two types of people on forums; those that give helpful advice, and the others

1998 Mitsubishi FTO GPVR AERO ;)
User avatar
Taz
Oldtimer
Posts: 3995
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:50 am
Location: Your mothers house

Re: 6a13

Post by Taz »

as well as being 500cc larger, so you can get more torque out of it, and being a larger displacement and mods will have a better effect. Honestly, for someone who blows a head gasket/waterlocks an engine etc and can pick up one of these cheap with a loom then hell - why not?
Image
Bennoz wrote: Cum gunt it!
User avatar
kiz
SA Coordinator
Posts: 2178
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 10:09 pm
Location: Adelaide, South Australia

Re: 6a13

Post by kiz »

Taz wrote:as well as being 500cc larger, so you can get more torque out of it, and being a larger displacement and mods will have a better effect. Honestly, for someone who blows a head gasket/waterlocks an engine etc and can pick up one of these cheap with a loom then hell - why not?
Having a higher cc doesn't mean crap sometimes, my MX6 has a 2.5L but that's a hunk of junk compared to my 2L FTO.

But hey if he has the engine to do the conversion good on him. I'd do it too if I had the money and the engine.
There are two types of people on forums; those that give helpful advice, and the others

1998 Mitsubishi FTO GPVR AERO ;)
User avatar
Taz
Oldtimer
Posts: 3995
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:50 am
Location: Your mothers house

Re: 6a13

Post by Taz »

There's no replacement for displacement.
Image
Bennoz wrote: Cum gunt it!
User avatar
kiz
SA Coordinator
Posts: 2178
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 10:09 pm
Location: Adelaide, South Australia

Re: 6a13

Post by kiz »

Taz wrote:There's no replacement for displacement.
Big ass turbo ;)
There are two types of people on forums; those that give helpful advice, and the others

1998 Mitsubishi FTO GPVR AERO ;)
User avatar
spetz
Oldtimer
Posts: 2915
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 6:00 pm

Re: 6a13

Post by spetz »

Viper99, you need to add more info.
Is your FTO MIVEC?
Do you want a 6A13 turbo or non?
What are you trying to achieve?
What is your budget?
User avatar
Bennoz
National President
Posts: 23676
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: 6a13

Post by Bennoz »

Yeah ya can't beat cubes.

It's a direct fit bar the rear turbo, need to either bash in the bulkhead or do it the classy way & make a new manifold. I prefer the classy way as there are a lot of brake lines near the bash in area that eventually get cooked.
User avatar
spency
Mechanic
Posts: 761
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 5:00 pm
Location: Hobart
Contact:

Re: 6a13

Post by spency »

Bennoz wrote:Yeah ya can't beat cubes.

It's a direct fit bar the rear turbo, need to either bash in the bulkhead or do it the classy way & make a new manifold. I prefer the classy way as there are a lot of brake lines near the bash in area that eventually get cooked.
Could a big single turbo make it easier to drop straight in?
Image
User avatar
vipfto
Forum Moderator
Posts: 4154
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 5:00 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: 6a13

Post by vipfto »

Easy to drop in but much more pipe fab work
FTO GR-TURBO
172KW ATW @ 11PSI
User avatar
Taz
Oldtimer
Posts: 3995
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:50 am
Location: Your mothers house

Re: 6a13

Post by Taz »

just take off one of the turbos and have the factory small one at the front :troll:
Image
Bennoz wrote: Cum gunt it!
User avatar
Daniel2019
Oldtimer
Posts: 7957
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:25 pm
Location: Sydney!
Contact:

Re: 6a13

Post by Daniel2019 »

Taz wrote:just take off one of the turbos and have the factory small one at the front :troll:
Yeah, you'll do 0-15 in no time! :troll:
I fix cars.
Bennoz wrote:I got Bali beli & sharted on my phone. But it was fun :D
bjk wrote:you old people are no help at all.
viper-99
Apprentice
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2012 9:34 pm

Re: 6a13

Post by viper-99 »

my fto is 1994 gp triptronic auto 2L v6 stock motor and for the moment I am looking at dropping in a non turbo 6a13 for the moment as I am on my p's and funding the project is no problem for me might also drop in a manual gearbox while I am going
User avatar
spetz
Oldtimer
Posts: 2915
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 6:00 pm

Re: 6a13

Post by spetz »

Being on your P's I doubt you will be allowed an engine conversion.
My suggestion would be start with a manual conversion.
Later on you can find a 6A13 SOHC and use your DOHC heads on it + get a piggyback computer to tune it.
If you will be rebuilding the engine, a cost effective way to strengthen it is to source stock 6A13TT con rods from someone who upgraded, and use 4G9X pistons to raise compression ratio. Then you can do other mods like cams, exhaust, intake etc, and considering the 2.5L capacity you should get good results from mods.

You'll never really be able to go past the 7,500 redline as the DOHC heads use hydraulic lifters, but either which way a 2.5L with a 7,500rpm redline should be a very quick little car.
User avatar
Daniel2019
Oldtimer
Posts: 7957
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:25 pm
Location: Sydney!
Contact:

Re: 6a13

Post by Daniel2019 »

spetz wrote:Being on your P's I doubt you will be allowed an engine conversion.
Makes no difference mate :mrgreen: . If the car is registered and not defectable, non turbo and under 200kw at the flywheel then its perfectly legal to drive, regardless of P plates or not ;)

Unless I'm mistaken. Ive never seen anything in P plater laws on the RTA website about it being illegal to drive a car with a different engine so yeah, its fine :D
I fix cars.
Bennoz wrote:I got Bali beli & sharted on my phone. But it was fun :D
bjk wrote:you old people are no help at all.
silverGPX
9.5"
Posts: 6793
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 5:00 pm

Re: 6a13

Post by silverGPX »

Or just do no conversion, and buy a better car.
User avatar
spetz
Oldtimer
Posts: 2915
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 6:00 pm

Re: 6a13

Post by spetz »

Daniel2019 wrote:
spetz wrote:Being on your P's I doubt you will be allowed an engine conversion.
Makes no difference mate :mrgreen: . If the car is registered and not defectable, non turbo and under 200kw at the flywheel then its perfectly legal to drive, regardless of P plates or not ;)

Unless I'm mistaken. Ive never seen anything in P plater laws on the RTA website about it being illegal to drive a car with a different engine so yeah, its fine :D
I think (but could be mistaken) that any mods that need an engineers certificate to make legal is not allowed by P platers?
Hopefully someone in the know can clear this up
Post Reply