Intake Pics

General Questions and comments

Moderators: IMC, Club Staff

User avatar
Bennoz
National President
Posts: 23676
jedwabna poszewka promocja
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Post by Bennoz »

Thats looks sweet!
Pomwa
Grease Monkey
Posts: 180
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:00 pm
Location: Canberra
Contact:

Post by Pomwa »

Thanks for the positive feedback everyone :D and like i said theres a few other bits and pieces ill be doing over the next few weeks so ill keep you posted........

Might even pull my thumb out of my a$$ and start a gallery in 'Members Rides' 8)
If you can't be good, be good at it!!
User avatar
nicholas
Veteran Mechanic
Posts: 1091
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 5:00 pm
Location: Hills, NSW

Post by nicholas »

Pomwa, looks really good.

As far as I could see on the website though the K&N system only includes the sealed filter and the pipe from the bumper. Does it also include the pipe from filter to TB, or is that a separate piece of gear?
Resident Asshole.
Pomwa
Grease Monkey
Posts: 180
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:00 pm
Location: Canberra
Contact:

Post by Pomwa »

Seperate gear. Picked up the rest from Supacheap:

- 1 Monza 90 degree elbow 76mm to 76mm but to be honest i would have been better off getting the 76mm to 70mm as i had to use a reducer at the TB
- 1 chrome elbow fit perfect into the 76mm end
- 1 Monza reducer to filter 76mm to 70mm
- 1 meter of 10mm tubing cut down in length to appropriate size for the crank case vent

I found using the chrome elbow with a slight bend in it rather than using a 90 degree bend gave it a smoother flow towards the original intake hole. My original thought was to have it come straight through the front bar to the left of the pasenger headlight but i didnt want to go cutting holes in it just yet .......... and no doubt f**k it up :lol:

Im pretty happy with what ive done and have noticed that acceleration is a lot quicker and smoother ....... however a lot quieter too...
If you can't be good, be good at it!!
User avatar
nicholas
Veteran Mechanic
Posts: 1091
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 5:00 pm
Location: Hills, NSW

Post by nicholas »

Thanks for the info dude.

Considering something very similar for mine :D
Resident Asshole.
User avatar
zuihoujueding
Oldtimer
Posts: 1980
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by zuihoujueding »

Pomwa wrote:Seperate gear. Picked up the rest from Supacheap:

- 1 Monza 90 degree elbow 76mm to 76mm but to be honest i would have been better off getting the 76mm to 70mm as i had to use a reducer at the TB
- 1 chrome elbow fit perfect into the 76mm end
- 1 Monza reducer to filter 76mm to 70mm
- 1 meter of 10mm tubing cut down in length to appropriate size for the crank case vent

I found using the chrome elbow with a slight bend in it rather than using a 90 degree bend gave it a smoother flow towards the original intake hole. My original thought was to have it come straight through the front bar to the left of the pasenger headlight but i didnt want to go cutting holes in it just yet .......... and no doubt f**k it up :lol:

Im pretty happy with what ive done and have noticed that acceleration is a lot quicker and smoother ....... however a lot quieter too...
whats the damage mate? that configuration is exactly what i want! just havent thought of which part to get. thanks a lot for the info.
Pomwa
Grease Monkey
Posts: 180
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:00 pm
Location: Canberra
Contact:

Post by Pomwa »

zuihoujueding wrote:
Pomwa wrote:Seperate gear. Picked up the rest from Supacheap:

- 1 Monza 90 degree elbow 76mm to 76mm but to be honest i would have been better off getting the 76mm to 70mm as i had to use a reducer at the TB
- 1 chrome elbow fit perfect into the 76mm end
- 1 Monza reducer to filter 76mm to 70mm
- 1 meter of 10mm tubing cut down in length to appropriate size for the crank case vent

I found using the chrome elbow with a slight bend in it rather than using a 90 degree bend gave it a smoother flow towards the original intake hole. My original thought was to have it come straight through the front bar to the left of the pasenger headlight but i didnt want to go cutting holes in it just yet .......... and no doubt f**k it up :lol:

Im pretty happy with what ive done and have noticed that acceleration is a lot quicker and smoother ....... however a lot quieter too...
whats the damage mate? that configuration is exactly what i want! just havent thought of which part to get. thanks a lot for the info.
Not including the Apollo filter it was around $70-$80 for the other fittings from supacheap
If you can't be good, be good at it!!
User avatar
koolio1234
Oldtimer
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Western Sydney
Contact:

Post by koolio1234 »

Heres mine.....she breathes easy through 4"......
Image
User avatar
dstocks
National Vice President
Posts: 9529
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 5:00 pm
Location: Utopia
Contact:

Post by dstocks »

The K&N setup looks good.

For those that were looking for mine:

Image
Image
Image
Complete FTO (http://www.completefto.com.au/completefto.asp)
    Image
    If you are trying to contact me and not getting a quick answer, its because im disorganised. Hassle me and ill get back to you
    User avatar
    zuihoujueding
    Oldtimer
    Posts: 1980
    Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 5:00 pm
    Location: Sydney

    Post by zuihoujueding »

    koolio1234 wrote:Heres mine.....she breathes easy through 4"......
    Image
    and cost around $400 mark?
    User avatar
    nicholas
    Veteran Mechanic
    Posts: 1091
    Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 5:00 pm
    Location: Hills, NSW

    Post by nicholas »

    koolio, that looks good too.

    The only reason why I prefer pomwa's setup is because yours seems not to be fully enclosed, whereas the K&N setup is. Just means that no hot air can possibly get into it, know what I mean?
    Resident Asshole.
    User avatar
    RallyMad
    Oldtimer
    Posts: 1223
    Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 6:00 pm
    Location: Toowoomba

    Post by RallyMad »

    zuihoujueding wrote:
    koolio1234 wrote:Heres mine.....she breathes easy through 4"......
    Image
    and cost around $400 mark?
    Isn't that a UAS kit mate. Or have you made changes to it?
    User avatar
    zuihoujueding
    Oldtimer
    Posts: 1980
    Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 5:00 pm
    Location: Sydney

    Post by zuihoujueding »

    it is from UAS. no mistake about it. can tell from its "riveted" box. But he piping is neat.
    User avatar
    koolio1234
    Oldtimer
    Posts: 2574
    Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:00 pm
    Location: Western Sydney
    Contact:

    Post by koolio1234 »

    Cost was about $300 for the set. The only reason i put those shields there because they blocked out most of the radiated heat from the engine. Its also so i dont get defected :D I agree that a fully enclosed one is better but i guess those heat shields are better than nothing, right? Although, im thinking that when the diy goes ahead, i'll remove the shields and install a decent box. Although even the way it is now i feel an amazing difference with more lower end power. The piping was insane when i first saw it, 4 - 5 inches 8O
    User avatar
    nicholas
    Veteran Mechanic
    Posts: 1091
    Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 5:00 pm
    Location: Hills, NSW

    Post by nicholas »

    koolio1234 wrote:Cost was about $300 for the set. The only reason i put those shields there because they blocked out most of the radiated heat from the engine. Its also so i dont get defected :D I agree that a fully enclosed one is better but i guess those heat shields are better than nothing, right? Although, im thinking that when the diy goes ahead, i'll remove the shields and install a decent box. Although even the way it is now i feel an amazing difference with more lower end power. The piping was insane when i first saw it, 4 - 5 inches 8O
    Yeah buddy, agree on the defect front; have the very same shield on at the moment for that reason.

    As far as being better than nothing, it's probably only marginally better; the engine sucks air from the place of least resistance, which is basically the engine bay unless one of two conditions are met - a) the whole intake to the front bumber is enclosed (ie. vacuum tight, like Pomwa's) or b) the car is moving at a reasonable speed, so that cold air is being forced into the shielded area where the pod is sitting.

    So basically, Pomwa's system is only really superior to yours when the car isn't moving, otherwise it won't matter that much provided your piping from bumper to airbox works as intended.
    Resident Asshole.
    User avatar
    koolio1234
    Oldtimer
    Posts: 2574
    Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:00 pm
    Location: Western Sydney
    Contact:

    Post by koolio1234 »

    yeah i know what you mean, as i said, its only temporary and keeps me from getting a defect notice. When we have the DIY day i'll bring a proper enclosed box and get some help and advice on how to fit it to maximise intake efficiency. when i said that it blocks out most of the heat, it really would only block out some becuase the heat radiated would bounce off the shield becuase of the thermal mass of the shields while the rest would infiltrate the obvious gaps as you said. Will be taken care of soon, maybe even be4 the diy day.
    User avatar
    RallyMad
    Oldtimer
    Posts: 1223
    Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 6:00 pm
    Location: Toowoomba

    Post by RallyMad »

    Thats pretty much exactly what I'll be looking at doing after I get the UAS kit.
    User avatar
    Bennoz
    National President
    Posts: 23676
    Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:00 pm
    Location: Sydney
    Contact:

    Post by Bennoz »

    All ya gotta do is line the UAS box with a $5 sunvisor sheet & she's good as gold! :D

    Image
    Image
    User avatar
    zuihoujueding
    Oldtimer
    Posts: 1980
    Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 5:00 pm
    Location: Sydney

    Post by zuihoujueding »

    isnt the sunvisor supposed to be covering the outside of the box? to reflect heat radiation. Placing them on the inside would trap heat in between the box and sunvisor. But i guess it does not matter much. And putting it internally certainly looks neater. 8)
    But its a good idea to secure (doubleside taped) the sunvisor thou.
    User avatar
    Bennoz
    National President
    Posts: 23676
    Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:00 pm
    Location: Sydney
    Contact:

    Post by Bennoz »

    Well, Im about to have an uncovered filter sucking into 2 turbo's, so I really dont care if I loose half a kilowatt to hot air :lol:
    Post Reply