Intake Pics
Moderators: IMC, Club Staff
- Bennoz
- National President
- Posts: 23676
- jedwabna poszewka promocja
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:00 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
-
- Grease Monkey
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:00 pm
- Location: Canberra
- Contact:
- nicholas
- Veteran Mechanic
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 5:00 pm
- Location: Hills, NSW
-
- Grease Monkey
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:00 pm
- Location: Canberra
- Contact:
Seperate gear. Picked up the rest from Supacheap:
- 1 Monza 90 degree elbow 76mm to 76mm but to be honest i would have been better off getting the 76mm to 70mm as i had to use a reducer at the TB
- 1 chrome elbow fit perfect into the 76mm end
- 1 Monza reducer to filter 76mm to 70mm
- 1 meter of 10mm tubing cut down in length to appropriate size for the crank case vent
I found using the chrome elbow with a slight bend in it rather than using a 90 degree bend gave it a smoother flow towards the original intake hole. My original thought was to have it come straight through the front bar to the left of the pasenger headlight but i didnt want to go cutting holes in it just yet .......... and no doubt f**k it up
Im pretty happy with what ive done and have noticed that acceleration is a lot quicker and smoother ....... however a lot quieter too...
- 1 Monza 90 degree elbow 76mm to 76mm but to be honest i would have been better off getting the 76mm to 70mm as i had to use a reducer at the TB
- 1 chrome elbow fit perfect into the 76mm end
- 1 Monza reducer to filter 76mm to 70mm
- 1 meter of 10mm tubing cut down in length to appropriate size for the crank case vent
I found using the chrome elbow with a slight bend in it rather than using a 90 degree bend gave it a smoother flow towards the original intake hole. My original thought was to have it come straight through the front bar to the left of the pasenger headlight but i didnt want to go cutting holes in it just yet .......... and no doubt f**k it up

Im pretty happy with what ive done and have noticed that acceleration is a lot quicker and smoother ....... however a lot quieter too...
If you can't be good, be good at it!!
- zuihoujueding
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 5:00 pm
- Location: Sydney
whats the damage mate? that configuration is exactly what i want! just havent thought of which part to get. thanks a lot for the info.Pomwa wrote:Seperate gear. Picked up the rest from Supacheap:
- 1 Monza 90 degree elbow 76mm to 76mm but to be honest i would have been better off getting the 76mm to 70mm as i had to use a reducer at the TB
- 1 chrome elbow fit perfect into the 76mm end
- 1 Monza reducer to filter 76mm to 70mm
- 1 meter of 10mm tubing cut down in length to appropriate size for the crank case vent
I found using the chrome elbow with a slight bend in it rather than using a 90 degree bend gave it a smoother flow towards the original intake hole. My original thought was to have it come straight through the front bar to the left of the pasenger headlight but i didnt want to go cutting holes in it just yet .......... and no doubt f**k it up![]()
Im pretty happy with what ive done and have noticed that acceleration is a lot quicker and smoother ....... however a lot quieter too...
-
- Grease Monkey
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:00 pm
- Location: Canberra
- Contact:
Not including the Apollo filter it was around $70-$80 for the other fittings from supacheapzuihoujueding wrote:whats the damage mate? that configuration is exactly what i want! just havent thought of which part to get. thanks a lot for the info.Pomwa wrote:Seperate gear. Picked up the rest from Supacheap:
- 1 Monza 90 degree elbow 76mm to 76mm but to be honest i would have been better off getting the 76mm to 70mm as i had to use a reducer at the TB
- 1 chrome elbow fit perfect into the 76mm end
- 1 Monza reducer to filter 76mm to 70mm
- 1 meter of 10mm tubing cut down in length to appropriate size for the crank case vent
I found using the chrome elbow with a slight bend in it rather than using a 90 degree bend gave it a smoother flow towards the original intake hole. My original thought was to have it come straight through the front bar to the left of the pasenger headlight but i didnt want to go cutting holes in it just yet .......... and no doubt f**k it up![]()
Im pretty happy with what ive done and have noticed that acceleration is a lot quicker and smoother ....... however a lot quieter too...
If you can't be good, be good at it!!
- koolio1234
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 2574
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:00 pm
- Location: Western Sydney
- Contact:
- dstocks
- National Vice President
- Posts: 9529
- Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 5:00 pm
- Location: Utopia
- Contact:
The K&N setup looks good.
For those that were looking for mine:



For those that were looking for mine:



Complete FTO (http://www.completefto.com.au/completefto.asp) 
If you are trying to contact me and not getting a quick answer, its because im disorganised. Hassle me and ill get back to you

If you are trying to contact me and not getting a quick answer, its because im disorganised. Hassle me and ill get back to you
- zuihoujueding
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 5:00 pm
- Location: Sydney
- nicholas
- Veteran Mechanic
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 5:00 pm
- Location: Hills, NSW
- zuihoujueding
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 5:00 pm
- Location: Sydney
- koolio1234
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 2574
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:00 pm
- Location: Western Sydney
- Contact:
Cost was about $300 for the set. The only reason i put those shields there because they blocked out most of the radiated heat from the engine. Its also so i dont get defected
I agree that a fully enclosed one is better but i guess those heat shields are better than nothing, right? Although, im thinking that when the diy goes ahead, i'll remove the shields and install a decent box. Although even the way it is now i feel an amazing difference with more lower end power. The piping was insane when i first saw it, 4 - 5 inches 


- nicholas
- Veteran Mechanic
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 5:00 pm
- Location: Hills, NSW
Yeah buddy, agree on the defect front; have the very same shield on at the moment for that reason.koolio1234 wrote:Cost was about $300 for the set. The only reason i put those shields there because they blocked out most of the radiated heat from the engine. Its also so i dont get defectedI agree that a fully enclosed one is better but i guess those heat shields are better than nothing, right? Although, im thinking that when the diy goes ahead, i'll remove the shields and install a decent box. Although even the way it is now i feel an amazing difference with more lower end power. The piping was insane when i first saw it, 4 - 5 inches
As far as being better than nothing, it's probably only marginally better; the engine sucks air from the place of least resistance, which is basically the engine bay unless one of two conditions are met - a) the whole intake to the front bumber is enclosed (ie. vacuum tight, like Pomwa's) or b) the car is moving at a reasonable speed, so that cold air is being forced into the shielded area where the pod is sitting.
So basically, Pomwa's system is only really superior to yours when the car isn't moving, otherwise it won't matter that much provided your piping from bumper to airbox works as intended.
Resident Asshole.
- koolio1234
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 2574
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:00 pm
- Location: Western Sydney
- Contact:
yeah i know what you mean, as i said, its only temporary and keeps me from getting a defect notice. When we have the DIY day i'll bring a proper enclosed box and get some help and advice on how to fit it to maximise intake efficiency. when i said that it blocks out most of the heat, it really would only block out some becuase the heat radiated would bounce off the shield becuase of the thermal mass of the shields while the rest would infiltrate the obvious gaps as you said. Will be taken care of soon, maybe even be4 the diy day.
- Bennoz
- National President
- Posts: 23676
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:00 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
- zuihoujueding
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 5:00 pm
- Location: Sydney
isnt the sunvisor supposed to be covering the outside of the box? to reflect heat radiation. Placing them on the inside would trap heat in between the box and sunvisor. But i guess it does not matter much. And putting it internally certainly looks neater.
But its a good idea to secure (doubleside taped) the sunvisor thou.

But its a good idea to secure (doubleside taped) the sunvisor thou.
- Bennoz
- National President
- Posts: 23676
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:00 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Contact: