Shell new High Octane Fuel: V-Power

General Questions and comments

Moderators: IMC, Club Staff

User avatar
robsta
Veteran Mechanic
Posts: 897
jedwabna poszewka promocja
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 5:00 pm
Location: Morayfield, QLD

Post by robsta »

JOeJOe wrote:What's the pricing like compared to the normal 98RON?
the 100 octane is another 3 or 4 cents more depends where you get it
User avatar
fto617
Veteran Mechanic
Posts: 1069
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by fto617 »

hey guys, this v-racing is definitely good
on my evo, apparently it is tuned for 100ron, compared to other 98ron i've used, which usually give me about 340km per tank (53L)
with the v-racing, i was able to get about 380 per tank!
and performance wise definitely noticeably smooter acceleration across the rev range.
some guy also had a dyno comparing the fuels, now i jsut gotta find it.
past ride : FTO gpx with lots of bling bling
Current ride: EVO 8 with the MOST CARBON IN AUSTRALIA....206KW AT ALL WHEELS
User avatar
jonowong
Oldtimer
Posts: 3420
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by jonowong »

u get less than 6.5L a tank dude... wtf?!
User avatar
Bennoz
National President
Posts: 23676
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Post by Bennoz »

LOL our last NSW cruise was dictated by his fuel stops :lol:
User avatar
Nacho
Oldtimer
Posts: 2087
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:00 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Nacho »

Why does he chew up fuel so much? Is it the way you drive? Or is it just the car?
You never get a second chance to make a first impression.
EURO
Oldtimer
Posts: 1346
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by EURO »

its an EVO! most reviews give them 16-20 per 100kms... you cant expect great performance without fuel use....
User avatar
khunjeng
Oldtimer
Posts: 4455
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:00 pm
Location: Melbourne, Victoria

Post by khunjeng »

EURO wrote:its an EVO! most reviews give them 16-20 per 100kms... you cant expect great performance without fuel use....
yeah my skyline gets outstanding fuel ecc. compared to mates in the club. I get about 450-500 max...from 60l...most get 350.
User avatar
jonowong
Oldtimer
Posts: 3420
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by jonowong »

:(
User avatar
Nacho
Oldtimer
Posts: 2087
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:00 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Nacho »

Ok so in technical terms, why does it chew up so much fuel say compared to Chris' Skyline which is a 3.0L V6 and runs a f*ckload of boost?
You never get a second chance to make a first impression.
User avatar
FTO338
Oldtimer
Posts: 6712
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2003 6:00 pm
Location: Port Melbourne: Pimping with RX400h, B200 Turbo.

Post by FTO338 »

Chris Skyline is RB25DET, so its 2.5L straight 6 not 3.0L or V6. :P

Haven't you seen the Toyota ad with Mr. T "Power without efficiency, isn't power" :lol:

It’s pretty simple, you got a little engine that pulls the same power of a larger one, so of course it’s going to use more petrol. Plus it’s an AWD, which need more power to run it and yes that mean fuel. :wink:
DISCLAIMER: The above text is the personal opinion of the author and does not represent the indisputable truth. The author is not responsible for any deaths, injuries or mental illness caused by the above statments.
User avatar
Nacho
Oldtimer
Posts: 2087
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:00 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Nacho »

Sh*t! 3.0L V6 is out of the GTO... :oops:

I always did think he had an RB26 for some reason.

Anyway I'm tipping that the Skyline would be heavier than the EVO so based on all those factors it sounds like it chews up petrol coz of the way it's driven... :?
You never get a second chance to make a first impression.
User avatar
fto617
Veteran Mechanic
Posts: 1069
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by fto617 »

hey guys
the car chews on petrol alright
it runs AWD and boost at 20psi
past ride : FTO gpx with lots of bling bling
Current ride: EVO 8 with the MOST CARBON IN AUSTRALIA....206KW AT ALL WHEELS
User avatar
Nacho
Oldtimer
Posts: 2087
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:00 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Nacho »

Does that mean if you lower the boost then it will improve your fuel economy?
You never get a second chance to make a first impression.
User avatar
fto617
Veteran Mechanic
Posts: 1069
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by fto617 »

oh nacho
my fuel consumption is not becoz of the way i drive...
most of the time i dont drive up to the boost point which is about 4k
i usually take it up to 3.2k when bost start to spool
so...300+km from one tank is from granny driving...
to give u an idea...at wake field, i do about 220km before petrol light shows
past ride : FTO gpx with lots of bling bling
Current ride: EVO 8 with the MOST CARBON IN AUSTRALIA....206KW AT ALL WHEELS
User avatar
lawrencetlc
Grease Monkey
Posts: 187
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 6:00 pm
Location: clayton, victoria
Contact:

Post by lawrencetlc »

mxysxy wrote:This is just another bogus marketing campaign of Shell,
V-Power is not a new thing,
It’s been in Europe for a long time,
I know in Turkey for over 3-4 years.

I think they simply introducing the V-Power to reduce the market share of BP Ultimate and Caltex high octane stuff,
Shell has failed with Optimax and trying to patch it now,

I honestly think that Optimax and V-Power is the same sh*t, just renaming it to sound it more sophisticated.
it has been in malaysia and singapore for more than 5 years... its to my surprise when i come to australia last year that they use "optimax" but not "V-power".
mxysxy
Oldtimer
Posts: 1905
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Post by mxysxy »

I have filled up the tank with VPower racing stuff yesterday,
To be honest it feels little better, and the sound of the exhaust has changed slightly, not sure if I'm imagining though.

Now about the Optimax, if you have a look at the bowser at the station, there is a sticker there that outlines the petrol they sell, and it actually says that Optimax is V-Power.
So, it is a really rebranding by renaming of Optimax

I reckon I will give 100octane a go for a while. It was $1.28 pre litre, which is pretty ok.
However, ir BP comes up with 100 octane, I would definately switch to that
I just dislike Shell
User avatar
FTO338
Oldtimer
Posts: 6712
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2003 6:00 pm
Location: Port Melbourne: Pimping with RX400h, B200 Turbo.

Post by FTO338 »

Hey Max did you fill it up after you empty your tank or at some other level?
DISCLAIMER: The above text is the personal opinion of the author and does not represent the indisputable truth. The author is not responsible for any deaths, injuries or mental illness caused by the above statments.
mxysxy
Oldtimer
Posts: 1905
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Post by mxysxy »

FTO338 wrote:Hey Max did you fill it up after you empty your tank or at some other level?
Red light was on,
Took about 54 litres
User avatar
leinad
Grease Monkey
Posts: 126
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 6:00 pm
Location: Adelaide

Post by leinad »

Hrrm,

Anyone use Boost fuel? from United

I have been using this for the last 10 re-fuels and it seems identical to the BP ultimate I have always used. Although it has ethynol?

Not that I go sniffing fuels, but do you guys notice each company seems to have differnt smelling fuels? WHen I had older cars, Woolworths smelt like rotting vegies.. fishers had a different bad stink.

Always gone to BP since trying the other places the 323 ran like crap.
User avatar
Hobbsie
Grease Monkey
Posts: 391
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Post by Hobbsie »

fto tank can take 54 litres? lol

when my dial is sitting at E i get 40 litres in but ive never seen fuel light come on
Post Reply