Anything off topic that you want to share with the group. (warning this board may include coarse language)
Moderators: IMC , Club Staff
Astron_Boy
Trolling Gen Y
Posts: 8400 Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 5:00 pm
Location: Wine Country NSW
Contact:
Post
by Astron_Boy » Mon Oct 08, 2012 1:00 pm
Watanabe wheels, always a favorite.
Headlights in GTO cyborg form, doesnt look toooooooooooo bad.
Bumper is a bit too F430, but it pulls it off ok.
The wheels make the car look widebodied which is cool.
or perhaps the rear has been flared a bit more than stock, not sure.
Interesting Sideskirts also.
Edit: just noticed the door, so the rear has been widebodied.
Pity.
Chiinkstarrh
Mechanic
Posts: 579 Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:00 pm
Post
by Chiinkstarrh » Mon Oct 08, 2012 1:51 pm
only if they can make it look less alike than a ferrarri then all good
FTO 95 GPX .................................................................................. 2000 MR2 Spyder
Astron_Boy
Trolling Gen Y
Posts: 8400 Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 5:00 pm
Location: Wine Country NSW
Contact:
Post
by Astron_Boy » Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:10 pm
Correction, not F430, McLaren.
ObsidianRadio
Oldtimer
Posts: 2050 Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 4:08 am
Location: Adelaide, SA
Contact:
Post
by ObsidianRadio » Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:14 pm
It looks like McLaren crossed with Veilside?
bjk
Totes
Posts: 5756 Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 1:34 pm
Location: Adelaide
Post
by bjk » Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:58 pm
Ahh, yeah, I can see the McLaren.
ObsidianRadio wrote: It looks like McLaren crossed with Veilside?
I thought that a bit when I saw the smiley-face curves at the edges. But this looks less goofy than the Veilside.
POWERED BY #TIMKNOTTMOTORSPORT: 2013-2016
silverGPX
9.5"
Posts: 6793 Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 5:00 pm
Post
by silverGPX » Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:55 pm
looks awesome
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
phi-tec
Veteran Mechanic
Posts: 1008 Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:53 pm
Location: qld
Post
by phi-tec » Mon Oct 08, 2012 7:45 pm
anyone else reckon the rear is slightly fail? i dno i might b blind but the for one the rear wheel looks much smaller then front even in terms of angles etc, and the ' boot' ? like where the arches go down towards the rear, seems like theres nothing at all also even in terms of angles
looks 9/10 otherwise
You have the right to remain silent, anything you do say will be quoted and used against you
spency
Mechanic
Posts: 761 Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 5:00 pm
Location: Hobart
Contact:
Post
by spency » Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:57 pm
phi-tec wrote: anyone else reckon the rear is slightly fail? i dno i might b blind but the for one the rear wheel looks much smaller then front even in terms of angles etc, and the ' boot' ? like where the arches go down towards the rear, seems like theres nothing at all also even in terms of angles
looks 9/10 otherwise
cause its been wide bodied, the panels from the middle of the wheel arch back would wrap around further and tighter to realign with the boot, giving the appearance its failed.
silverGPX
9.5"
Posts: 6793 Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 5:00 pm
Post
by silverGPX » Wed Oct 10, 2012 3:25 pm
This is better looking than any fto that is out there ever. stop dissing it. idiots.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Astron_Boy
Trolling Gen Y
Posts: 8400 Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 5:00 pm
Location: Wine Country NSW
Contact:
Post
by Astron_Boy » Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:09 pm
silverGPX wrote: This is better looking than any fto that is out there ever. stop dissing it. idiots.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Oh yeah.
I forgot you can't have an opinion these days.
sh*t.
bjk
Totes
Posts: 5756 Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 1:34 pm
Location: Adelaide
Post
by bjk » Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:41 pm
Astron_Boy wrote: silverGPX wrote: This is better looking than any fto that is out there ever. stop dissing it. idiots.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Oh yeah.
I forgot you can't have an opinion these days.
sh*t.
POWERED BY #TIMKNOTTMOTORSPORT: 2013-2016