More a query purely out of interest more than anything..
Has anyone done a before and after dyno showing torque readout after fitting a larger intake pipe or even a pod filter to an FTO?
I have a before and after power and AFR graph from UAS(and have seen others) showing the UAS pipe is good for more KW's particularly higher in the rev range - so everyone knows that, but I am curious what the torque curve would look like.
I recently sold the UAS pipe off my car to bass_twitch as I am selling my car, and since putting the stock pipe back on I would say the car actually feels BETTER in the low to mid rev range. It seems to have a bit more torque and is noticeably more punchy - something I didn't notice losing when going the other way. Funnily enough, when I put the pod filter on occasionally for a laugh I often thought the same thing after putting the stock box back on. IF anything I would say both the bigger pipe and pod freed up the top end, but lost me a bit of lowdown punch.
Anyone else noticed this before? Of course this is my seat of the pants dyno so yeah...
Larger intake pipes - lose torque down low?
Moderators: IMC, Club Staff
- evoman
- Grease Monkey
- Posts: 315
- jedwabna poszewka promocja
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 5:00 pm
- Location: Castle Hill, NSW
- bass_twitch
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 2423
- Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 3:37 pm
- Location: Western Sydney, NSW
Re: Larger intake pipes - lose torque down low?
Well since installing your pipe and getting a larger pod, I haven't noticed any major gain down low, but once MIVEC hits in, it seems like it is a bit faster/bit more of a kick.
- Supplanter
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 6420
- Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 5:00 pm
- Location: Arizona Bay
- Contact:
Re: Larger intake pipes - lose torque down low?
Same filter or did you replace it with a new one?
LED ALL the things.
- bass_twitch
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 2423
- Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 3:37 pm
- Location: Western Sydney, NSW
Re: Larger intake pipes - lose torque down low?
New.. went from 3" K&N to 4" K&N, so not a true test I guess..Supplanter wrote:Same filter or did you replace it with a new one?

- bass_twitch
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 2423
- Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 3:37 pm
- Location: Western Sydney, NSW
Re: Larger intake pipes - lose torque down low?
Actually after driving it a bit more today I'm going take back what i said before, I feel the car is probably more responsive down low too since the upgradebass_twitch wrote:New.. went from 3" K&N to 4" K&N, so not a true test I guess..Supplanter wrote:Same filter or did you replace it with a new one?
-
- Grease Monkey
- Posts: 210
- Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 10:32 pm
Re: Larger intake pipes - lose torque down low?
When i had my UAS did notice lost of low-end torque, city driving for example but around MIVEC range and above the induction sound
is telling you to hold on to that gear just a bit longer
That rectangular section on the standard pipe i feel is a cleaver design.Holds air when ya foot off the accelerator after a good flooring.
Don't recommend smoking but a cheesy test you can do is fill the two pipe with ciggie smoke. UAS didn't hold air as well so keep try to keep the revs up
With the UAS pipe doing 110km/h freeway speed, the engine sat at 3000-3100 RPM.
Standard pipe sat at 3500-3600 RPM.
Drive safe.
is telling you to hold on to that gear just a bit longer

That rectangular section on the standard pipe i feel is a cleaver design.Holds air when ya foot off the accelerator after a good flooring.
Don't recommend smoking but a cheesy test you can do is fill the two pipe with ciggie smoke. UAS didn't hold air as well so keep try to keep the revs up

With the UAS pipe doing 110km/h freeway speed, the engine sat at 3000-3100 RPM.
Standard pipe sat at 3500-3600 RPM.
Drive safe.
A stoke of luck or a gift from god?
The hand of fate or devil claws?
The hand of fate or devil claws?
- Astron_Boy
- Trolling Gen Y
- Posts: 8400
- Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 5:00 pm
- Location: Wine Country NSW
- Contact:
Re: Larger intake pipes - lose torque down low?
I remember an old Dyno day where Aza had the whale penis on and had a couple of runs.
The power/ torque dipped significantly at the mid point (mivec)
Going back to his previous set up the same day, 20 mins later if even, and the torque/ power curve were spot on.
In the end his larger intake did make a substantial difference to how the car ran and delivered it's power.
I believe Aza had it fixed, (correct me if wrong) by having a tune done, as he has a piggy back ECU inline with the factory.
The power/ torque dipped significantly at the mid point (mivec)
Going back to his previous set up the same day, 20 mins later if even, and the torque/ power curve were spot on.
In the end his larger intake did make a substantial difference to how the car ran and delivered it's power.
I believe Aza had it fixed, (correct me if wrong) by having a tune done, as he has a piggy back ECU inline with the factory.

- aza013
- NSW Coordinator
- Posts: 9089
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 5:00 pm
- Location: The Shire
- Contact:
Re: Larger intake pipes - lose torque down low?
The dip was tune related not air intake, but in saying that it's all related
It just came down to getting every thing working together.
