Page 1 of 2
your opinions on selling my fto
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 4:54 pm
by kl95fto
ok so im thinking about selling my fto to get a supra just ideas nothing confirmed id like some feed back on if its a good move beeing an fto club i know most will say fto but hoping for the mature members with some constructive critisisim/feedback.
also id like to know what price i could get for my car
its a 1995 gpx trip
white clean intirior in good nic 18 inc chrome rims mechanicly a1 just had new starter motor and a 1800 dollar service 1 week ago replacing all seals ect + belts
has done 180,000 km
pioneer head unit 1x12 inc option audio sub in box 2 option audio 6x9 and 2 option audio
6 inces i think lol. option audio 800 rms monoblock amp and a 4 chanel option audio amp not sure how many rms.sound system cost me $2100 about 1 month ago that was including instilation sounds awsome
cheers kahael...
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:05 pm
by I8A4RE
Turbo supra ...do it
Non turbo...... ARE YOU F^&KEN SERIOUS

Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:11 pm
by Astron_Boy
I8A4RE wrote:Turbo supra ...do it
Non turbo...... ARE YOU F^&KEN SERIOUS

+1
Almost as bad as going Civic VTEC YO!!!!! as an 'upgrade'

Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:27 pm
by Bennoz
My sister has an N/A Supra & it wouldn't pull a greased stick outta dogs arse. Seriously slow...
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:35 pm
by kl95fto
but being 3 liter wouldent that make it faster than the fto even with v tec
so what about car price??
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:39 pm
by Bennoz
kl95fto wrote:but being 3 liter wouldent that make it faster than the fto even with v tec
Nope. There's no VTEC YO!!!!! & the car weighs twice as much as the FTO. Trust me, you'll be dissappointed, I was.
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:44 pm
by koolio1234
If your truly unsatisfied with your fto, then a turbo supra wouldnt be a bad upgrade.
If you were to sell your fto you might get about 8000 - 9000, even though youve serviced it and put a sound system in, it has slightly high km's.
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 7:14 pm
by sublime19
From memory Supra's weigh around 1600 kgs.
TT Supra - Hell yea, go for it.
Non turbo - I'm gonna have to say "Don't do it".
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 7:20 pm
by zuihoujueding
Even a non T supra has more potential upgrades and aftermarket support than and FTO. I would say follow your heart and never look back.
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 7:21 pm
by Astron_Boy
Any turbo is going to be an upgrade from the FTO.
Unless you get a high powered N/A, then there's not much of an upgrade.
The FTO has an ace of being light weight where most cars suffer from dead weight.
If ou want power, then a big block N/A, or turbo is the way to go.
If you just want pose factor, then whatever floats your boat.
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 7:41 pm
by mr-charisma
If Supra's are what you're into then I say get one.
Don't bother getting an NA one, nad please don't mention anything about "turboing" an NA one after you buy it.
If you're gonna do it, do it properly & get the TT

Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 11:04 pm
by J
mr-charisma wrote:If Supra's are what you're into then I say get one.
Don't bother getting an NA one, nad please don't mention anything about "turboing" an NA one after you buy it.
If you're gonna do it, do it properly & get the TT

Agreed. Although i was quite fixated on the n/a supra before i got the fto. I still look at the supra and go damn i wish the fto >>looked<< like that. To me how i see it is if i cant do much to an fto ($$ wise) for performance then what difference in a n/a supra. The fto is more of a cruise car/work car for me. But that might not be your situation. (all IMO)
For the price, i'd say around 8-9grand would be an average. The first thing people look at when browsing the ads is how many k's has it done. My 2cents.
Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 12:45 am
by koolio1234
You might want to consider a few things as well:
- more petrol and less mileage per tank.
- possibly higher insurance costs.
- Can you afford to rebuild the turbo every year or two if you go the turboed supra route.
Its important to think ahead
Good luck

Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 2:22 am
by xSlurpee
MAD-FTO wrote:I8A4RE wrote:Turbo supra ...do it
Non turbo...... ARE YOU F^&KEN SERIOUS

+1
Almost as bad as going
Civic VTEC YO!!!!! as an 'upgrade' 
tell me the bad points! ... any VTEC YO!!!!! integra / civic / accord would be fairly even with the fto stock for stock
anyways back on topic, dont go the supra ... unless its turbo'd
my automatic fto can be about 3 cars+ in front from 0 - 140kms ... against a manual n/a supra (stock for stock )
Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 2:49 am
by sublime19
xSlurpee wrote:MAD-FTO wrote:I8A4RE wrote:Turbo supra ...do it
Non turbo...... ARE YOU F^&KEN SERIOUS

+1
Almost as bad as going
Civic VTEC YO!!!!! as an 'upgrade' 
tell me the bad points! ... any VTEC YO!!!!! integra / civic / accord would be fairly even with the fto stock for stock
His point was that it's not really an upgrade, it's the same sh*t lol, which you yourself said noob k**t

Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 7:58 am
by I8A4RE
Just ask jamie about a N/A supras vs a gpx fto......can someone say "destroyed"
Seriously before i did all my mods, i decided to take a few supra's for a spin to make sure I was making the right decision keeping the fto and after one drive of a n/a supra i was massively dissapointed. BIG SLOW PIECE 'O' sh*t. My mates g/f also has one and she has done exhaust and pod and its still a joke
Sure you can argue there's more aftermarket parts for the supra but really apart from the normal (CHEAP) mods everyone goes for, how many poeple actually go fully sik on it and in the end if you did you will only ever hear people saying why didnt you just get a turbo'ed one. You could of had the same power for about a qtr of the cost. but hey thats just my 2 cents
Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 9:53 am
by nicholas
Like everyone said, turbo is a maybe, N/A is a definite no-no.
But - are you on your Ps? Can you even drive turbo?
If yes - you still need to think about:
- higher insurance premiums
- higher fuel bills
- higher maintenance bills
- more chance of things going wrong (more complexity involved)
- turbo import cars tend to get THRASHED or CRASHED or both
- higher upfront price for a TT supra
Not saying don't do it, but at least go in with your eyes wide open...
Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 12:15 pm
by FTEvolution
SOmething that hasn't even been mentioned yet is the difference in specification of the N/ A over TT Supra.
TT's will have bigger brakes, stronger dif (you would assume), better gearbox (potentially, the Getrag is awesome)
Just like how a GR FTO has smaller brakes than a GPX
If I was buying a Supra, it would be TT or nothing, same for a GTO, same for an RX7 (yes I do know that S6+ n/ a RX7's are like hens teeth, but they do exist...)
Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 1:52 pm
by kl95fto
thanks guys yeah and im on my ps so turbo isnt an option the reason im thinking about supra is becouse i bought my car 2 months ago for 10.5 grand and have had 2 spend 2 grand on it just so it runs its a1 now but what will be next i duno if i can aford to keepfixing it.
i also thort a supra would be cheaper 2 fix maby im wrong
Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 2:14 pm
by zuihoujueding
Maintenance cost shouldn't differ much from FTO. Given both are imports and not many mechanics dare to touch them.
FTO is a bitch to fix, given the cramped engine compartment and complexity of the engine.
Not sure about the supra.
What you can do are:
1)know your car limits
2)dont drive like an idiot to avoid paying fines
3)dont lose your job (if you are working)
4)learn to DIY
and you'll be fine!
