what good is a girl friend!

Post by **Bennoz** » Thu Jul 28, 2005 10:11 pm

It'd be the smell

Jimbo · Post by **Jimbo** » Thu Jul 28, 2005 11:04 pm

For FTO88? or sumthin! lol a forum for relationships? haha your one farni bloke! jus curious do u have a gf? or would u prefer a bf? hehe *runs n hides*

paladin · Post by **paladin** » Thu Jul 28, 2005 11:12 pm

damn i started a hot thread... how about the ladies posing some hot shots to wamrit up some more

heeh

*hides in a nuke shelter*

Post by **kazbah** » Fri Jul 29, 2005 12:01 am

Boys, boys, boys, what u guys dont seem to understand is that the basic difference between the sexes is that females are ceberal and males are visual... if you want to score play with the mind not the body

FTO338 · Post by **FTO338** » Fri Jul 29, 2005 12:13 am

Jimbo wrote:For FTO88? or sumthin! lol a forum for relationships? haha your one farni bloke! jus curious do u have a gf? or would u prefer a bf? hehe *runs n hides*

Is this how you ask a guy out? By asking them if he *~delightful!~* or not? haahahaha

No I'm not *~delightful!~*, anyone could of work that out from the posts i've make just in this thread

& if you like to check outside the garbo section then you find i've mention my gf millions of time for almost 3yrs since i've joined here (including my old forum name). And yes is still the same girl after all these years

paladin wrote:damn i started a hot thread... how about the ladies posing some hot shots to wamrit up some more heeh

*hides in a nuke shelter*

We probably get ban if we start a "hot shot" thread, but i know heaps of forum out there does have thread like this, no i'm not talking about XXX. The one i'm talking about don't contain any nuded pics at all, pictures are just from "Cleo" "FMH"...& so on, so they are "G" rated.

FTO338 · Post by **FTO338** » Fri Jul 29, 2005 12:51 am

kazbah wrote:Boys, boys, boys, what u guys dont seem to understand is that the basic difference between the sexes is that females are ceberal and males are visual... if you want to score play with the mind not the body

Yes yes yes Man are visual & females are ceberal Yes yes yes

Johannes Gutenberg (1450) Printing Press
Leonardo the Vinci (1503) Mona Lisa Portrait
Blaise Pascal (1642) Adding Machine
Benjamin Franklin (1752) Lightning Rod
Charles T. Wiesenthal (1755) Sewing Machine
Joseph and Jacques Montgolfier (1783) Hot Air Balloon
Count Alessandro Volta (1799) Electric Battery
Alan deVilbiss (1803) Spray Gun
Oliver Evans (1805) Refrigerator
Alexander Bain (1843) Fax Machine
Thomas Adams (1845) Chewing Gum
Daniel Hess (1860) Vacuum Cleaner
Christopher Sholes (1867) Typewriter
Alexander Graham Bell (1876) Telephone
Thomas Alva Edison (1879) Light Bulb
Karl Benz (1889) Automobile
Will Keith Kellogg (1894) Kellogg's Corn Flakes
Johann Vaaler (1899) Paper Clip
Willis Haviland Carrier (1902) Air Conditioner
Albert Einstein (1905) Theory of Relativity
Garrett Morgan (1920) Traffic Light
Philo T. Farnsworth (1927) Television
Percy LeBaron Spencer (1945) Microwave Oven
John Mauchly and J. P. Eckert (1946) Computer ENIAC
Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak (1976) Personal Computer
Dennis C. Hayes (1977) PC Modem
Richard Frenkiel and Joel Engel (1983) Mobile Phone
Tim Berners-Lee (1991) World Wide Web

YES YES YES YES

Post by **kazbah** » Fri Jul 29, 2005 9:17 am

Yes yes yes, I too can google women inventors and come up with hundreds of names, but that was not my point. Some of the most beautiful women go out with some of the ugliest men, why?? because they are turned on by the mans mind not by his looks...... Men on the other hand look at the outside packaging first and MAYBE go deeper.

Just a one example, Angela Jole and Billy Bob Thornton. So again I say if you want to score, play with her mind not her body (well, you can do that as well but not straight away

)

Post by **Bennoz** » Fri Jul 29, 2005 9:27 am

Play with her mind ay?.... here I am thinking of a chick with a blokes finger in her ear.... stupid visual mind.

Post by **kazbah** » Fri Jul 29, 2005 9:30 am

Bennoz wrote:Play with her mind ay?.... here I am thinking of a chick with a blokes finger in her ear.... stupid visual mind.

LMAO, oh dear I pity your girlfriend......

Post by **Bennoz** » Fri Jul 29, 2005 9:32 am

kazbah wrote:
Bennoz wrote:Play with her mind ay?.... here I am thinking of a chick with a blokes finger in her ear.... stupid visual mind.
LMAO, oh dear I pity your girlfriend......

I know - she's gonna have a finger in her ear tonight

Post by **kazbah** » Fri Jul 29, 2005 9:34 am

Bennoz wrote:
kazbah wrote:
Bennoz wrote:Play with her mind ay?.... here I am thinking of a chick with a blokes finger in her ear.... stupid visual mind.
LMAO, oh dear I pity your girlfriend......
I know - she's gonna have a finger in her ear tonight

Looking on the bright side at least it was a finger!!

Post by **Bennoz** » Fri Jul 29, 2005 10:51 am

kazbah wrote:
Bennoz wrote:
kazbah wrote:
Bennoz wrote:Play with her mind ay?.... here I am thinking of a chick with a blokes finger in her ear.... stupid visual mind.
LMAO, oh dear I pity your girlfriend......
I know - she's gonna have a finger in her ear tonight
Looking on the bright side at least it was a finger!!

At least its her ear!

FTO338 · Post by **FTO338** » Fri Jul 29, 2005 11:08 am

kazbah wrote:Yes yes yes, I too can google women inventors and come up with hundreds of names, but that was not my point. Some of the most beautiful women go out with some of the ugliest men, why?? because they are turned on by the mans mind not by his looks...... Men on the other hand look at the outside packaging first and MAYBE go deeper.

Just a one example, Angela Jole and Billy Bob Thornton. So again I say if you want to score, play with her mind not her body (well, you can do that as well but not straight away )

Facts 1: There are not more then 10 female major world inventors through out 14th to 20th century. While there were more then a hundred male.

Facts 2: Angela Jole is with Brad Pitts at the moment, there's goes your theory.

Facts 3: By saying men generally after looks then brains, is just as bad saying women are not as strong as men & most are gold digger.

You do not want to go into Nerolinguistic (yes is a real word, & no it's not from Google like you assume how I got the inventors) but if you do then please enlighten us. I've did 3yrs of it.

BTW I like to make this clear for all the newbies & for the right wingers

, just in case they think we are serious here we. WE ARE NOT this is a Garbo section where we dump sh*t for stress relieves from day to day crap ehehehehe

Chiangstar · Post by **Chiangstar** » Fri Jul 29, 2005 11:24 am

LMAO
hahahaha we're a classy bunch arent we

simon

Post by **kazbah** » Fri Jul 29, 2005 12:13 pm

BTW I like to make this clear for all the newbies & for the right wingers , just in case they think we are serious here we. WE ARE NOT

I'll commend you on the above statement, now back to the war of the sexs

Facts 1: There are not more then 10 female major world inventors through out 14th to 20th century. While there were more then a hundred male.

First off, I could spiel on about all the major female inventors like Stephanie Kwolek: bullet-resistant vest or maybe Dr. Marie Curie the scientist who discovered radioactive metals i.e. Radium & Polonium, but lets not bore the audience.... The reason that it seems there are more male inventors are
1. Males high five themselves when they stack the dishwasher (oh that was invented by a woman also!). So therefore always putting their achievements out to the world for praise. Women just do it and get on with other stuff
2. Women dont have the time to sit on their arses and contenplate their navel hair (probably because they dont have any, but I digress) while trying to think up a way to motorise beer cans so they dont have to shift their lazy carcases and get one from the fridge themselves. Anyone can think up an invention if they are given enough free time.

Facts 2: Angela Jole is with Brad Pitts at the moment, there's goes your theory

Catherine Zeta Jones - Michael Douglas, Rick Ocasek - wed model Paulina Porizkova. Lots of ugly men with beautiful women just walk down the street with your eyes open sometime

Facts 3: By saying men generally after looks then brains, is just as bad saying women are not as strong as men & most are gold digger.

It is true that women are not as strong -physically- as men, however mental strength is another thing! As far as the gold digging thing, if an 80yo old fart weds a 25 yo bimbo he deserves it!

You do not want to go into Nerolinguistic (yes is a real word, & no it's not from Google like you assume how I got the inventors) but if you do then please enlighten us. I've did 3yrs of it.

Depends upon whether you mean Nerolinguistic or Neurolinguistic

FTO338 · Post by **FTO338** » Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:34 pm

Point taken, & dam thanks for the spelling mistake, wheres the F7 function here ehehehe

First off, I could spiel on about all the major female inventors like Stephanie Kwolek: bullet-resistant vest or maybe Dr. Marie Curie the scientist who discovered radioactive metals i.e. Radium & Polonium, but lets not bore the audience.... The reason that it seems there are more male inventors are
1. Males high five themselves when they stack the dishwasher (oh that was invented by a woman also!). So therefore always putting their achievements out to the world for praise. Women just do it and get on with other stuff
2. Women dont have the time to sit on their arses and contenplate their navel hair (probably because they dont have any, but I digress) while trying to think up a way to motorise beer cans so they dont have to shift their lazy carcases and get one from the fridge themselves. Anyone can think up an invention if they are given enough free time.

Hmm i found there is a bit of contradiction here, if you saying men would be lazy if we invented a motorise beer opener. So why did a woman invented a dish wisher that uses 3 times the water & energy? Anyone can claim they made an invention, but is it really usefull is another story.

Women don't have time to sit on their arse, but they sure have time for shopping shoes, cloths, & spending 3-4 hours at a time getting their hair & nails done at a salon. (it's still sitting to me)

Catherine Zeta Jones - Michael Douglas, Rick Ocasek - wed model Paulina Porizkova. Lots of ugly men with beautiful women just walk down the street with your eyes open sometime

If Iâ€™m a stereotype person who work for New Idea or Women's weekly, then I would just say these women are gold diggers, they are married to a person who worth at least twice if not three times of themselves. But I'm not

It is true that women are not as strong -physically- as men, however mental strength is another thing! As far as the gold digging thing, if an 80yo old fart weds a 25 yo bimbo he deserves it!

So why do women always use PMS as an excuse, & also crying over just about every little bit of issue/problem? The old fart might deserves it, but that doesn't change the fact that those women are gold diggers & a sl*t.

Damm did any saw the last year or was it the year before comedy festival? The topic was battle of the sexes!

Anyway how did this thread turn into battle of the sexes. We men didn't turn the other thread "what good is a bf for" into this.

Post by **kazbah** » Fri Jul 29, 2005 2:02 pm

Your very welcome, I dont mind pointing out your spelling mistakes, the pleasure was all mine

Hmm i found there is a bit of contradiction here, if you saying men would be lazy if we invented a motorise beer opener. So why did a woman invented a dish wisher that uses 3 times the water & energy? Anyone can claim they made an invention, but is it really usefull is another story.

Actually a dishwasher is more economical than hand washing if utilised properly. Also it still requires human intevention therefore not the lazy assed motorised beer invention

Women don't have time to sit on their arse, but they sure have time for shopping shoes, cloths, & spending 3-4 hours at a time getting their hair & nails done at a salon. (it's still sitting to me)

Maybe so but lets look at this. All the things mentioned above are productive. Women shop to provide food for the family. Last I checked my kids hadn't gone to the shop to by their own shoes, clothes etc, same can be said for the husband.

If Iâ€™m a stereotype person who work for New Idea or Women's weekly, then I would just say these women are gold diggers, they are married to a person who worth at least twice if not three times of themselves. But I'm not

Oh I forgot to mention the 30 something nobody married to Joan Collins, and I can remember quite a few of Elizabeth Taylors exes being toyboy nobodys also - works both ways

So why do women always use PMS as an excuse, & also crying over just about every little bit of issue/problem? The old fart might deserves it, but that doesn't change the fact that those women are gold diggers & a sl*t

PMS is a medically recognised symptom. Believe me women dont welcome its onset contrary to what men may think. As far as crying at every crises, what century are you living in

Guess what, women hold down high pressure jobs these days as well as running a household and family, looking after the family budget, paying bills etc, etc, etc. Cant say they would achieve much if they kept breaking down now would they??

Anyway how did this thread turn into battle of the sexes. We men didn't turn the other thread "what good is a bf for" into this.

You could always conceed defeat and get this thread back on track

FTO338 · Post by **FTO338** » Fri Jul 29, 2005 2:25 pm

If it makes u feel better then yes yes yes yes yes

Post by **kazbah** » Fri Jul 29, 2005 2:49 pm

FTO338 wrote:If it makes u feel better then yes yes yes yes yes

LOL

Post by **Bennoz** » Fri Jul 29, 2005 3:19 pm

Hahahaha LOL yes yes yes