FTO AUSTRALIA

Posted: **Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:38 pm**

ahh not sure about that haha someone else mite be able to shed some light on this?

Posted: **Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:41 pm**

Valandis91 wrote:ahh not sure about that haha someone else mite be able to shed some light on this?

ok kool

Posted: **Tue Apr 28, 2009 8:39 am**

Here's the UAS kit.

Here's the ARC.

To my way of thinking, the flow from the UAS one is gonna be a whole lot better than the ARC. They have 1 left in stock & its black.

Posted: **Tue Apr 28, 2009 8:53 am**

from the way it looks, the arc would create some pretty turbulent airflow. would be interesting to see a flow bench comparison

Posted: **Tue Apr 28, 2009 10:17 am**

I think ARC is more of a brand thing and all those welding cost money.labour. I would go for the UAS pipe as its looks like it provides much smoother flow.

More over the the ARC pipe is metal and it can be freakingly hot, missing the point of a CAI.

my 2 cents.

Posted: **Tue Apr 28, 2009 10:52 am**

I would say your 2c is right on there mate, but I would love to see a cross section of the ARC. Is there something we are missing? Is that a replacement to "legally" improve air flow but lower induction noise? That is a damn big rectangular chamber for it to just b hollow...

Posted: **Tue Apr 28, 2009 10:57 am**

FTEvolution wrote:I would say your 2c is right on there mate, but I would love to see a cross section of the ARC. Is there something we are missing? Is that a replacement to "legally" improve air flow but lower induction noise? That is a damn big rectangular chamber for it to just b hollow...

CUT IT
CUT IT
CUT IT

Posted: **Tue Apr 28, 2009 11:31 am**

dont use my arc pipe for your picture ben

.. go find your own

Sugar.

Posted: **Tue Apr 28, 2009 11:43 am**

SUGAR!!!

Posted: **Tue Apr 28, 2009 2:08 pm**

i think the idea behind the arc intake is to expand the gas to release some of the kenetic energy which would have a cooling effect
before hitting the throttle body

or it might just be for better throttle response for the lower revs

Posted: **Tue Apr 28, 2009 2:16 pm**

i can confirm the arc intake "big chamber" is hollow.

cant say if its better than the whale penis (uas)
but it looks nicer,

thank goodness i got rid of that battery.

Posted: **Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:12 pm**

zuihoujueding wrote:I think ARC is more of a brand thing and all those welding cost money.labour. I would go for the UAS pipe as its looks like it provides much smoother flow.

More over the the ARC pipe is metal and it can be freakingly hot, missing the point of a CAI.

my 2 cents.

FTOEvolution wrote:I would say your 2c is right on there mate, but I would love to see a cross section of the ARC. Is there something we are missing? Is that a replacement to "legally" improve air flow but lower induction noise? That is a damn big rectangular chamber for it to just b hollow...

i agree with you but what about the air filter box since that is metal wouldnt that get hot to then?

like this one the K&N Apollo
http://www.modyourcar.com.au/kn-apollo- ... lver-p5171

wouldnt this also get hot and just be sucking in hot air too

Posted: **Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:15 pm**

FTO_GPvR wrote:
zuihoujueding wrote:I think ARC is more of a brand thing and all those welding cost money.labour. I would go for the UAS pipe as its looks like it provides much smoother flow.

More over the the ARC pipe is metal and it can be freakingly hot, missing the point of a CAI.

my 2 cents.

FTOEvolution wrote:I would say your 2c is right on there mate, but I would love to see a cross section of the ARC. Is there something we are missing? Is that a replacement to "legally" improve air flow but lower induction noise? That is a damn big rectangular chamber for it to just b hollow...

i agree with you but what about the air filter box since that is metal wouldnt that get hot to then?

like this one the K&N Apollo
http://www.modyourcar.com.au/kn-apollo- ... lver-p5171

wouldnt this also get hot and just be sucking in hot air too

the answer is yes. But i dont think the outer shell of the apollo is metal. Should be plastic with metallic finish. Correct me if im wrong.

Posted: **Tue May 05, 2009 8:10 pm**

zuihoujueding wrote:
FTO_GPvR wrote:
zuihoujueding wrote:I think ARC is more of a brand thing and all those welding cost money.labour. I would go for the UAS pipe as its looks like it provides much smoother flow.

More over the the ARC pipe is metal and it can be freakingly hot, missing the point of a CAI.

my 2 cents.

FTOEvolution wrote:I would say your 2c is right on there mate, but I would love to see a cross section of the ARC. Is there something we are missing? Is that a replacement to "legally" improve air flow but lower induction noise? That is a damn big rectangular chamber for it to just b hollow...

i agree with you but what about the air filter box since that is metal wouldnt that get hot to then?

like this one the K&N Apollo
http://www.modyourcar.com.au/kn-apollo- ... lver-p5171

wouldnt this also get hot and just be sucking in hot air too
the answer is yes. But i dont think the outer shell of the apollo is metal. Should be plastic with metallic finish. Correct me if im wrong.

hey man yeah thanks for the info i also i found that it was plastic too
thanks for your help mate

Posted: **Thu May 07, 2009 6:08 pm**

lol

could u get rid of the '9' at the end of mine?

people mistake it for "tipping", its just "tippin"

edit: oops too late, didn't know this section got moved

Posted: **Thu May 07, 2009 7:17 pm**

LOL about time uze all stopped spamming my threads HAHAHAHA
..JKS

anyways thanks for cleaning it up ben if it was you that cleaned it up

Posted: **Fri May 08, 2009 8:47 am**

No probs

And Tippin, you're done!

FTO AUSTRALIA

Air Filter