http://www.engine-power.com/lamborghini/gallardo.html
have fun!...damn 0-60mph in 4s !
My mate went for a drive in one the other day...he reckons its the best thing since sliced bread..if you have $425k spare!
2004 Lamborghini Gallardo Pictures
Moderators: IMC, Club Staff
- khunjeng
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 4455
- jedwabna poszewka promocja
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:00 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Victoria
- BuCkEt
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 6:00 pm
- Location: Canberra
Not really a fan of the Lambo's but can't argue with figures like that!
I do find it odd that the Gallardo is slower than the Murcielago though...you'd think that they'd evolve with each new car.
I'd still rather a Zonda though, sexiest car on the planet!
Having a peek through this site....this is heaps nifty...cheers!
I do find it odd that the Gallardo is slower than the Murcielago though...you'd think that they'd evolve with each new car.
I'd still rather a Zonda though, sexiest car on the planet!

Having a peek through this site....this is heaps nifty...cheers!
- khunjeng
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 4455
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:00 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Victoria
-
- Mechanic
- Posts: 418
- Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 6:00 pm
- Location: Previously NZ, now Hertfordshire, England
Well the Gallardo is not really supposed to be a sucessor to the Murcielago, they are supposed to exist side by side. The Murcielago is meant to be more of a competitor to supercars like the Ferrari 575 and the Zonda, whereas the Gallardo is meant to be a competitor to cars like the Porsche 911 - ie smaller, lighter...BuCkEt wrote:Not really a fan of the Lambo's but can't argue with figures like that!
I do find it odd that the Gallardo is slower than the Murcielago though...you'd think that they'd evolve with each new car.
I'd still rather a Zonda though, sexiest car on the planet!![]()
Having a peek through this site....this is heaps nifty...cheers!
[url=http://www.atom.net.nz/afterburner/fto/index.htm][img]http://www.atom.net.nz/afterburner/ftologos.jpg[/img][/url]
It's gone :( - now carless...
It's gone :( - now carless...
- BuCkEt
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 6:00 pm
- Location: Canberra
This would explain why they released the Gallardo only a few years after the Murcielago, there's normally a longer wait between Lamborghinis.afterburner wrote:Well the Gallardo is not really supposed to be a sucessor to the Murcielago, they are supposed to exist side by side. The Murcielago is meant to be more of a competitor to supercars like the Ferrari 575 and the Zonda, whereas the Gallardo is meant to be a competitor to cars like the Porsche 911 - ie smaller, lighter...BuCkEt wrote:Not really a fan of the Lambo's but can't argue with figures like that!
I do find it odd that the Gallardo is slower than the Murcielago though...you'd think that they'd evolve with each new car.
I'd still rather a Zonda though, sexiest car on the planet!![]()
Having a peek through this site....this is heaps nifty...cheers!
-
- Veteran Mechanic
- Posts: 1001
- Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2003 6:00 pm
- Location: FTO Capital of Australia
- Contact:
I would rather have the koenigsegg personally.
http://www.autogaleria.sitenet.pl/tapet ... php?page=0
http://www.autogaleria.sitenet.pl/tapet ... php?page=0
- Supplanter
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 6422
- Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 5:00 pm
- Location: Arizona Bay
- Contact:
MMMMM Yummymrx wrote:I would rather have the koenigsegg personally.
http://www.autogaleria.sitenet.pl/tapet ... php?page=0

LED ALL the things.
-
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 1217
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 6:00 pm
me toomrx wrote:I would rather have the koenigsegg personally.
http://www.autogaleria.sitenet.pl/tapet ... php?page=0
