Sound Deadener
Moderators: IMC, Club Staff
-
- Mechanic
- Posts: 747
- jedwabna poszewka promocja
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 5:00 pm
- Location: Brisbane
- Contact:
Sound Deadener
Has anyone here used Dynamat Extreme or Stinger Roadkill?
just finding my car has too much road noise and i want to use it on the floors and doors.
And yes! its supposed to be light weight Boris!!!
just finding my car has too much road noise and i want to use it on the floors and doors.
And yes! its supposed to be light weight Boris!!!
Jono
- FTO338
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 6712
- Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2003 6:00 pm
- Location: Port Melbourne: Pimping with RX400h, B200 Turbo.
I think Josh (eftooh) & Mil (ftoluv) had use with Dynamat, i could be wrong, so don't quote me on it.
DISCLAIMER: The above text is the personal opinion of the author and does not represent the indisputable truth. The author is not responsible for any deaths, injuries or mental illness caused by the above statments.
-
- Apprentice
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 5:00 pm
- Location: England
- Contact:
I've bought the dynamat extreme bulk pack (contains 9 sheets), which was enough to do the front door panels, rear door panels and behind the panel surrounding the rear quarter window, under and behind the rear seats.
It has definitely made a big difference, if you just want to remove road noise sound proof the floor plan.
The dynamat extreme boot kit (contains 5 sheets), is enough to do the side walls of the boot only.
It has definitely made a big difference, if you just want to remove road noise sound proof the floor plan.
The dynamat extreme boot kit (contains 5 sheets), is enough to do the side walls of the boot only.
-
- Mechanic
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 5:00 pm
- Location: Brisbane
- Contact:
-
- Veteran Mechanic
- Posts: 1022
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 6:00 pm
- Location: Sydney, NSW
-
- Mechanic
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 5:00 pm
- Location: Brisbane
- Contact:
-
- Veteran Mechanic
- Posts: 1022
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 6:00 pm
- Location: Sydney, NSW
Advertising mumbo jumbo 
If it's lighter then regular proofing then odds are it's less efficient (resulting from it being less dense).
The fact that you said it has insulating properties almost scares me
Most heat is generated inside the car because sunshine heats up, and reflects off, the internal surfaces after entering through the windows, insulating the outer shell isn't going to keep your car any cooler.
This is just my opinion after all, but i'd go for something else

If it's lighter then regular proofing then odds are it's less efficient (resulting from it being less dense).
The fact that you said it has insulating properties almost scares me

This is just my opinion after all, but i'd go for something else

-
- Mechanic
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 5:00 pm
- Location: Brisbane
- Contact:
haha yes advertising mumbo jumbo, but its better! lol
http://www.sounddeadenershowdown.com/
havent read it..but should be a good read.
http://www.sounddeadenershowdown.com/
havent read it..but should be a good read.
Jono
-
- Veteran Mechanic
- Posts: 1022
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 6:00 pm
- Location: Sydney, NSW
I highly suggest you do read it. What it shows is that Dynamat eXtreme costs 4 times and weighs as much as twice as its competitors.
The cheapest (also the least heaviest) of the bunch withstood temperatures up to 100degrees celsius! I don't know about you but I have never, ever, touched a part of my car other then the bonnet which has reached a temperature even approaching that of the boiling point of water. If it gets that hot your going to have other problems to worry about much more dire then your soundproofing coming off and making a mess of parts of the car which never see the light of day.
The aforementioned cheapest product also had the best adherence (not that it should be any of your concern, you'll never be dangling weights off your soundproofing).
The author keeps making note that his tests are far from perfect, and they are far from it. The most important test of all, a practical test of sound deadening performance, was not undertaken at any stage.
Thus confirming my opinion that brand and price really don't matter all that much. Don't get dynamat extreme, you dont even get the wankvalue of having a visible logo.
The cheapest (also the least heaviest) of the bunch withstood temperatures up to 100degrees celsius! I don't know about you but I have never, ever, touched a part of my car other then the bonnet which has reached a temperature even approaching that of the boiling point of water. If it gets that hot your going to have other problems to worry about much more dire then your soundproofing coming off and making a mess of parts of the car which never see the light of day.
The aforementioned cheapest product also had the best adherence (not that it should be any of your concern, you'll never be dangling weights off your soundproofing).
The author keeps making note that his tests are far from perfect, and they are far from it. The most important test of all, a practical test of sound deadening performance, was not undertaken at any stage.
Thus confirming my opinion that brand and price really don't matter all that much. Don't get dynamat extreme, you dont even get the wankvalue of having a visible logo.
-
- Mechanic
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 5:00 pm
- Location: Brisbane
- Contact:
Yeah had a read of it, really good read. also read some other forum posts to see whether people were happy with their dynamat, Stingers, brownbread etc etc..
I wish the article tested how well the products worked.
i thought it was 50% less weight but still really efficient, but from these test weighed more? so more density i guess.
Dynamat does cost more which is the biggest turnoff...
quite a few people who used dynamat were still happy with the product after some time. Read some stories of some brown bread or some other deadener falling off, smelling, melting after a couple of summer months which is a bit scary.
anyway i just bought some dynamat extreme for the "safe" buy.
I wish the article tested how well the products worked.
i thought it was 50% less weight but still really efficient, but from these test weighed more? so more density i guess.
Dynamat does cost more which is the biggest turnoff...
quite a few people who used dynamat were still happy with the product after some time. Read some stories of some brown bread or some other deadener falling off, smelling, melting after a couple of summer months which is a bit scary.
anyway i just bought some dynamat extreme for the "safe" buy.

Jono
-
- Apprentice
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 5:00 pm
- Location: England
- Contact:
Well I personally used 2 old camping mats that I cut up and used that to sound proof the floor pan, not a brilliant solution but a lot cheaper than dynamat.Jono wrote:thanks for the advice
what should i be using for the floors? Dynaliner or extreme?
should i be considering the stinger range?
I also bought a couple of sheets of sound proofing called Deadmat from ebay and I really wished I hadn't it just doesn't stick to the car where as dynamat will stick everytime. You get what you pay for in my opinion and Dynamat extreme is really good stuff.
- efteoh
- Grease Monkey
- Posts: 224
- Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2004 6:00 pm
- Location: Melbourne
well, in terms of sound, you certainly get what you pay for. but by the same token, sound deaden absorbs the sound and suposedly turn it into heat, (the black stuff witht the silver aluminium backing) and also acts as a barrier. the heavier the material the better the sound deadening properties. i couldnt afford/justify dynamat to do my entire floor pan, wheel arches etc. so i used this stuff called flashtac. its not as thick/heavy as the stuff mil uses, therefore dosent sound deaden as well, but is lighter. i came to a compromise as i didnt want to add too much weight, but i didnt like road noise too much either.