Fto Vs Gto

General Questions and comments

Moderators: IMC, Club Staff

Post Reply
User avatar
Ftowner
Apprentice
Posts: 76
jedwabna poszewka promocja
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 1:40 pm

Fto Vs Gto

Post by Ftowner »

Hey guys, I know i'm not even close to getting my full licence, but i was just wondering about when i do get it and how i want to turbo my FTO. Thinking it over though, mayby i'd rather upgrade to a GTO as it will come with the twin turbo anyway :) What are your thoughts guys?
User avatar
phi-tec
Veteran Mechanic
Posts: 1008
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:53 pm
Location: qld

Re: Fto Vs Gto

Post by phi-tec »

well my friend owns a non turbo GTO, so i cant really say much for performance as you're looking at TT, interior, from what i can recall felt smaller to the fto.. (in the back anyway) its a fkin big + heavy car, if you're gonna get a gto get the newer ones, i think its vr4?? (non flip up lights) they look so much better :)
You have the right to remain silent, anything you do say will be quoted and used against you
User avatar
aza013
NSW Coordinator
Posts: 9089
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Location: The Shire
Contact:

Re: Fto Vs Gto

Post by aza013 »

Big, heavy and hard to work on.
If your not mechanically minded it would cost an arm and a leg to have some one work on it.
User avatar
shadowarrior
Tightarse
Posts: 2703
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 4:48 pm
Location: Gold Coast

Re: Fto Vs Gto

Post by shadowarrior »

aza013 wrote:Big, heavy and hard to work on.
If your not mechanically minded it would cost an arm and a leg to have some one work on it.
+1.

I've heard parts are a bitch to source as well. Didn't find many GTO owners (club) around when I was looking either which meant lesser support/opportunity to learn.
User avatar
Ftowner
Apprentice
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 1:40 pm

Re: Fto Vs Gto

Post by Ftowner »

Yeah i would definitely go for the VR4-4! Just seems easier to buy a Gto than to modify my Fto. But as you guys said, i looked at a UK and American Gto club, and they don't seem as good as this one!

Well if its going to be that much harder and cost that much more, guess it isn't worth it. I do love the look of the Gto though!
User avatar
shadowarrior
Tightarse
Posts: 2703
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 4:48 pm
Location: Gold Coast

Re: Fto Vs Gto

Post by shadowarrior »

Rather plan at the NSX to be your next upgrade after the FTO. I know that's what my future plan is :)

If you are hell bent on driving a twin turbo car, you can try the Soarer V6 TT (not sequential turbos though). But they are not as fun to drive as the FTO ...I test drove one before buying the FTO :P
User avatar
Ftowner
Apprentice
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 1:40 pm

Re: Fto Vs Gto

Post by Ftowner »

Nsx would be one of my DREAM cars, not just an upgrade haha. Cost too much for me but good luck to you man! I don't mind staying with my Fto anyway :)
EscapingFate
Mechanic
Posts: 664
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 9:33 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Fto Vs Gto

Post by EscapingFate »

If you dont mind station wagons stageas are pretty damn nice when done properly... and they fly...
Image
User avatar
-Nighthawk-
Oldtimer
Posts: 1540
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 6:00 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: Fto Vs Gto

Post by -Nighthawk- »

I love the look of the latter GTOs, it's a shame they are so expensive to own / maintain / source parts for. Things such as the headlights cost over $1,000 to replace (for later models).
User avatar
crosso
Grease Monkey
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 2:23 pm
Location: Hunter Valley NSW

Re: Fto Vs Gto

Post by crosso »

-Nighthawk- wrote:I love the look of the latter GTOs, it's a shame they are so expensive to own / maintain / source parts for. Things such as the headlights cost over $1,000 to replace (for later models).
I concur, the late models look pretty insane. I don't think I have ever seen one in Australia, whereas (despite still being rare) I've seen a few FTO's
User avatar
Daniel2019
Oldtimer
Posts: 7957
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:25 pm
Location: Sydney!
Contact:

Re: Fto Vs Gto

Post by Daniel2019 »

crosso wrote:
-Nighthawk- wrote:I love the look of the latter GTOs, it's a shame they are so expensive to own / maintain / source parts for. Things such as the headlights cost over $1,000 to replace (for later models).
I concur, the late models look pretty insane. I don't think I have ever seen one in Australia, whereas (despite still being rare) I've seen a few FTO's
I saw 2 the other day. One in a dealership, the other driving around. Ive seen a few, pretty rare, though.
I fix cars.
Bennoz wrote:I got Bali beli & sharted on my phone. But it was fun :D
bjk wrote:you old people are no help at all.
User avatar
-Nighthawk-
Oldtimer
Posts: 1540
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 6:00 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: Fto Vs Gto

Post by -Nighthawk- »

According to some reviews I've been watching they actually aren't that bad to handle? With AWD and twin turbo I'd imagine they would be quite fun to drive.

Also didn't realise the Dodge Stealth is the 3000GT :p
User avatar
Technikhaus
Oldtimer
Posts: 3656
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 4:45 pm
Location: Dunedin - NZ
Contact:

Re: Fto Vs Gto

Post by Technikhaus »

More GTOs here than FTOs I've noticed :p
Man '96 FTO GPX
Man '89 Legacy RS Rally car
Man '90 MR2 GT
Auto '08 Fairmont Ghia
User avatar
Kustom
Oldtimer
Posts: 6144
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 5:00 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Fto Vs Gto

Post by Kustom »

-Nighthawk- wrote:According to some reviews I've been watching they actually aren't that bad to handle? With AWD and twin turbo I'd imagine they would be quite fun to drive.

Also didn't realise the Dodge Stealth is the 3000GT :p
One of my friends owns one and it hauls arse, in a straight line & around corners!
Image
Taz wrote:When funds allow
User avatar
crosso
Grease Monkey
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 2:23 pm
Location: Hunter Valley NSW

Re: Fto Vs Gto

Post by crosso »

Kustom wrote:
-Nighthawk- wrote:According to some reviews I've been watching they actually aren't that bad to handle? With AWD and twin turbo I'd imagine they would be quite fun to drive.

Also didn't realise the Dodge Stealth is the 3000GT :p
One of my friends owns one and it hauls arse, in a straight line & around corners!
Better then FTO's around courners?
User avatar
Ftowner
Apprentice
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 1:40 pm

Re: Fto Vs Gto

Post by Ftowner »

Dam I want one so bad. Would be a head turner for sure! Would feel good to have such a rare car as well. But the costs are too much and if it's hard to source the parts in the first place, then i won't worry about it. Happy with my Fto anyway :)
User avatar
Nacho
Oldtimer
Posts: 2087
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:00 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: Fto Vs Gto

Post by Nacho »

-Nighthawk- wrote:According to some reviews I've been watching they actually aren't that bad to handle? With AWD and twin turbo I'd imagine they would be quite fun to drive.

Also didn't realise the Dodge Stealth is the 3000GT :p
Yeah I don't think they handle all as bad as everyone suggests. I mean you can't really compare how a 1200kg car handles compared to a 1650kg car. And to haul 1650kg from 0 to 100km/h in 5 seconds flat is pretty impressive :D
You never get a second chance to make a first impression.
EscapingFate
Mechanic
Posts: 664
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 9:33 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Fto Vs Gto

Post by EscapingFate »

They are amazing cars ive seen a black and a red one around my area... and they do infact haul ass...
Image
Post Reply