V6 non-mivec air intake
Moderators: IMC, Club Staff
-
- Apprentice
- Posts: 29
- jedwabna poszewka promocja
- Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 9:07 pm
V6 non-mivec air intake
Can anyone help me. I have a non-mivec V6 and i have bigger intake hose to go from the maf to the throttle body. What is the little hose that joins to this on the standard set up? And do i need to join it to the new intake hose i'm putting on or...? Thanks for the help
- Sahin
- HULK
- Posts: 5519
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 10:38 pm
- Location: Up to me nuts in boys guts
V6 non-mivec air intake
Hey Bobby, post a photo of what you mean...
But it sounds to me like a drain hose? So if any water gets sucked in it wont go through to your throttle body..
But it sounds to me like a drain hose? So if any water gets sucked in it wont go through to your throttle body..
-
- 9.5"
- Posts: 6793
- Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 5:00 pm
Re: V6 non-mivec air intake
No its for the oil that gets blown out of the engine it goes back into the intake system and back into the engine.
Thats why people get oil catch cans.
Thats why people get oil catch cans.
-
- Apprentice
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 9:07 pm
Re: V6 non-mivec air intake
I cant upload a photo cause i'm at work but after a little web search i've found that people put tiny air filters on the little hose to block it off instead of drilling a hole into the new air intake hose? I'm hoping this is right anyway...
- Bennoz
- National President
- Posts: 23676
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:00 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
Re: V6 non-mivec air intake
Yeah you can put a filter on it. I had one there for a number of years without issue.
Ideally, its best piped back into the intake though.
Ideally, its best piped back into the intake though.
- Dras
- Mechanic
- Posts: 584
- Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 5:00 pm
- Location: Castle Hill, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: V6 non-mivec air intake
It is actually illegal and defectable if you don't have it plumbed into the intake.Bennoz wrote:Ideally, its best piped back into the intake though.
Simply putting a filter here allows hydrocarbon rich blowby to escape which contributes to smog blah blah blah.
Me? Bitter? f**k no. I think it's hilarious.
- Bennoz
- National President
- Posts: 23676
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:00 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
Re: V6 non-mivec air intake
On a GPX it's also considered 'metered' air flow as well. The ECU is expecting it.Dras wrote:It is actually illegal and defectable if you don't have it plumbed into the intake.Bennoz wrote:Ideally, its best piped back into the intake though.
Simply putting a filter here allows hydrocarbon rich blowby to escape which contributes to smog blah blah blah.
- Technikhaus
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 3656
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 4:45 pm
- Location: Dunedin - NZ
- Contact:
Re: V6 non-mivec air intake
So it's best to keep it on the intake pipe in a GPX then?
Man '96 FTO GPX
Man '89 Legacy RS Rally car
Man '90 MR2 GT
Auto '08 Fairmont Ghia
Man '89 Legacy RS Rally car
Man '90 MR2 GT
Auto '08 Fairmont Ghia
- Taz
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 3995
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:50 am
- Location: Your mothers house
Re: V6 non-mivec air intake
Buy a 50 dollar universal cusco catch can, problem solved and you look like a hektic c**t!

Bennoz wrote: Cum gunt it!
- Dras
- Mechanic
- Posts: 584
- Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 5:00 pm
- Location: Castle Hill, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: V6 non-mivec air intake
Solve what? It is still illegal and still defect able it is just more expensive.
Me? Bitter? f**k no. I think it's hilarious.
- Taz
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 3995
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:50 am
- Location: Your mothers house
Re: V6 non-mivec air intake
So a fully plumbed catch can that doesnt in any way circulate to the atmosphere illegal?

Bennoz wrote: Cum gunt it!
- Daniel2019
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 7957
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:25 pm
- Location: Sydney!
- Contact:
Re: V6 non-mivec air intake
Bear in mind how stupid the government can be at times mate hahaTaz wrote:So a fully plumbed catch can that doesnt in any way circulate to the atmosphere illegal?
I fix cars.
Bennoz wrote:I got Bali beli & sharted on my phone. But it was fun
bjk wrote:you old people are no help at all.
- Dras
- Mechanic
- Posts: 584
- Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 5:00 pm
- Location: Castle Hill, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: V6 non-mivec air intake
Technically, modifying any emission control device is illegal without an engineering certificate.
I tried a completely sealed 2 catch can setup and the catch can between the rear rocker cover and the intake pipe caught absolutely no oil. The catch can between the pcv and the lower intake manifold caught some oil but really not enough to justify the effort.
This was using 2 properly designed catch can with baffles rather than blingy ones on an na Fto.
I tried a completely sealed 2 catch can setup and the catch can between the rear rocker cover and the intake pipe caught absolutely no oil. The catch can between the pcv and the lower intake manifold caught some oil but really not enough to justify the effort.
This was using 2 properly designed catch can with baffles rather than blingy ones on an na Fto.
Me? Bitter? f**k no. I think it's hilarious.
- fraz91
- Hair-do
- Posts: 881
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 6:00 pm
- Location: 4wding over you, Sydney
Re: V6 non-mivec air intake
You don't really need a catch-can on an N/A vehicle in my opinion. There's not enough combustion pressure to cause the excessive blow-by that warrants the catch can. Boosted vehicles tend to need them as the extra combustion pressure gets forced past the rings and causes more blow-by than standard. Vehicles being used on track require them from memory, but I'll be damned if I can remember why 

I'll have an FTO one day... i swear!
until then:
1. 2001 Merc-Benz A160 (porta-loo on wheels)
2. 2007 Peugeot 307 TDi (more fun than you'd expect)
3. [url=ttp://ftoaustralia.com/v3/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=25373]2009 Mitsubishi Triton Di-D (a monster in its own right)[/url]
4. 1992 Nissan NX Coupe (club car and project car)
5. 1996 Holden SB Barina - "The Nugget"
6. 1996 Jeep XJ Cherokee Sport - The Budget Build
7. 2010 Toyota Landcruiser 76 Series - V8 Goodness... - Build coming soon.
8. 1990 Audi 90 manual - The delightfully dignified daily driver
until then:
1. 2001 Merc-Benz A160 (porta-loo on wheels)
2. 2007 Peugeot 307 TDi (more fun than you'd expect)
3. [url=ttp://ftoaustralia.com/v3/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=25373]2009 Mitsubishi Triton Di-D (a monster in its own right)[/url]
4. 1992 Nissan NX Coupe (club car and project car)
5. 1996 Holden SB Barina - "The Nugget"
6. 1996 Jeep XJ Cherokee Sport - The Budget Build
7. 2010 Toyota Landcruiser 76 Series - V8 Goodness... - Build coming soon.
8. 1990 Audi 90 manual - The delightfully dignified daily driver
Astron_Boy wrote:No correction needed Gen Y, you are correct.
Bennoz wrote:My rubbing happens on the inside.
- Shane001
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 2730
- Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:00 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
Re: V6 non-mivec air intake
CAMS regulation requirementfraz91 wrote: Vehicles being used on track require them from memory, but I'll be damned if I can remember why
-
- Apprentice
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 9:07 pm
Re: V6 non-mivec air intake
So you think i should put a little breather filter over the end of it or drill a hole into the intake tube? Whats the easiest or most common thing people do?
Your mum rides shotgun in my car
-
- 9.5"
- Posts: 6793
- Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 5:00 pm
Re: V6 non-mivec air intake
Just put a breather on it bro, its easier, and im sure if you get pulled up your not gonna be defected with a massive fine etc etc, if anything run a little longer tube off it and hide it underneath something?