Buying a full cat-back exhaust

This forum is for technical discussions on anything that will make your car handle better or go faster.

Moderators: IMC, Club Staff

User avatar
MADFTO
Mechanic
Posts: 449
jedwabna poszewka promocja
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2003 5:00 pm

Post by MADFTO »

All has to do with backpressure and what rev range you want to tune the whole system to.

I've got 2.5, but most people should go 2.25.

I've got specific purpose for the choice of exhaust piping I have, only reason why I did it =)
User avatar
hnm738
Grease Monkey
Posts: 232
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 5:00 pm

Post by hnm738 »

i went to this exhaust place that does my wheel and my muffler

he put in a sports muffler for me awhile ago
and i decided to change to a 2.5 ich exhaust he told me 200$

i thought that was good from cat to muffler
but then he told me i wont notice a difference in power except it would just sound louder

so i didnt go ahead with it
User avatar
hnm738
Grease Monkey
Posts: 232
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 5:00 pm

Post by hnm738 »

i went to this exhaust place that does my wheel and my muffler

he put in a sports muffler for me awhile ago
and i decided to change to a 2.5 ich exhaust he told me 200$

i thought that was good from cat to muffler
but then he told me i wont notice a difference in power except it would just sound louder

so i didnt go ahead with it
User avatar
Boris
Oldtimer
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 6:00 pm

Post by Boris »

So would changing to a larger sized cannon type muffler change anything, say if I have a 2.5" system in place? Hmm...

I guess not, but just wanna make sure...
D-TRAIN
Mechanic
Posts: 589
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Post by D-TRAIN »

What you'll find if you go the Jap brands, the bolt-on cat-back systems for the FTO are 2.5" for the GPXs. For eg. Apexi, Fujitsubo, HKS. So unless you go custom, you don't really have a choice in what size diameter you want your cat-back to be.

I chose Apexi because I wanted a bolt-on kit and not a custom made one. And quite a number of FTOs on Japanese websites I saw had this system as well, so that's how I was convinced also.

I've yet to see a bolt-on titanium cat system for an FTO though. All I can say is people with turbos are spoilt with choices! Oh yeah, either that or if you have a Honda.
From FTO to EVO......
User avatar
Guni_GuGu
Grease Monkey
Posts: 264
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 6:00 pm

Post by Guni_GuGu »

Someone tell me, why would you replace the stock pipes on a GPX non turbo though?

The stock's are nearly 2.5, so what's the point? The muffler I can understand... but what else? and why?
21mrk
Grease Monkey
Posts: 101
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by 21mrk »

I understang what you are saying about why bother..but i just had my 2.25" cat back fitted on the weekend, I can definently feel a greater pull in the lower rev range.

Its not huge, but for $160 to fit this, it was cheap.(i had my own muffler)

it was kind like, yeah we can fit that, $75 or $160 for full cat back.. also I got a HUGE resinator too, makes it nice to listen too.
User avatar
Guni_GuGu
Grease Monkey
Posts: 264
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 6:00 pm

Post by Guni_GuGu »

21mrk wrote:I understang what you are saying about why bother..but i just had my 2.25" cat back fitted on the weekend, I can definently feel a greater pull in the lower rev range.

Its not huge, but for $160 to fit this, it was cheap.(i had my own muffler)

it was kind like, yeah we can fit that, $75 or $160 for full cat back.. also I got a HUGE resinator too, makes it nice to listen too.
Me personnaly... I don't trust "feels like" very much... I like stats and measurements better, and a 2.4" mandrell bent, str8 tru exhaust should be better then any 2.25" exhaust... Thats my belief.

The muffler and ressy mite be majking it sound tougher and sound klike it's pulling harder.... but really, "feel" is all hearsay, and i'm shocked, that there are sooo many FTO's out there with full cat-back exhaust systems, yet, the stock piping is more then sufficient.
User avatar
FTO338
Oldtimer
Posts: 6712
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2003 6:00 pm
Location: Port Melbourne: Pimping with RX400h, B200 Turbo.

Post by FTO338 »

Guni_GuGu wrote: i'm shocked, that there are sooo many FTO's out there with full cat-back exhaust systems, yet, the stock piping is more then sufficient.
Most of the FTO landed here from Jap are with cat-back exhaust system, due to the Jap love the sound of aftermarket exhaust, so it would be their first choice of any mod.
DISCLAIMER: The above text is the personal opinion of the author and does not represent the indisputable truth. The author is not responsible for any deaths, injuries or mental illness caused by the above statments.
User avatar
Guni_GuGu
Grease Monkey
Posts: 264
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 6:00 pm

Post by Guni_GuGu »

FTO338 wrote:
Guni_GuGu wrote: i'm shocked, that there are sooo many FTO's out there with full cat-back exhaust systems, yet, the stock piping is more then sufficient.
Most of the FTO landed here from Jap are with cat-back exhaust system, due to the Jap love the sound of aftermarket exhaust, so it would be their first choice of any mod.
Ok... so the muffler and ressy would be nice to make it sound better... but why the piping from the cat? Whats to gain there?
User avatar
FTO338
Oldtimer
Posts: 6712
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2003 6:00 pm
Location: Port Melbourne: Pimping with RX400h, B200 Turbo.

Post by FTO338 »

So it would look "Awesome" as a whole cat-back system, instead of the "chop-welded" look.

Most important of all, labour in Japan are very very very expensive, so its not worth the owner to pay someone to do the "chop-welded", as it takes more time (yes which mean money) to do the bolt on system.
DISCLAIMER: The above text is the personal opinion of the author and does not represent the indisputable truth. The author is not responsible for any deaths, injuries or mental illness caused by the above statments.
TheSentry
Grease Monkey
Posts: 328
Joined: Thu May 15, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: South West Sydney
Contact:

Post by TheSentry »

I'll admitt I got my cat-back for sound and to set peoples car alarms off. :lol:
[img]http://users.bigpond.net.au/sentry/sig.jpg[/img]
EURO
Oldtimer
Posts: 1346
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by EURO »

i would imagine that most after market exhausts arent hugely different to the factory in terms of diameter etc? which ever car you decide to change it on....

isnt it mainly, that they are often made out of better quality materials and often run a much less restricted path????

im just guessing, but from all reports, changing the piping from the cat to the muffler has appeared to get better results from the members cars here, especially those who backed them up with dyno results???

correct me if im blatantly wrong lol
D-TRAIN
Mechanic
Posts: 589
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Post by D-TRAIN »

In terms of materials, I can personally vouch for the quality of materials used in the Apexi N1 cat back. I've had it for a couple of years, and it is still solid. The Apexi also only has one pre-muffler whereas the stock cat-back has a couple. More free flowing I would imagine.

I still don't fully comprehend the issue with back-pressure or the lack thereof. Yet to see any results either way with bigger/smaller diameter pipping.

But I must admit I got the cat-back more for aesthetic reasons than anything else :wink:
From FTO to EVO......
Post Reply