GG by cops -_-

Post by **Bennoz** » Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:26 am

FtoSam wrote:around $3,000 worth

Pah, amateur. $27,000 in 13 years

*prouds*

Website · Post by **Lawso** » Mon Jan 12, 2009 6:16 pm

the second you admit guilt is when they get you

for instance

"are you aware that your not displaying your p plates?"

"yes i am, people stole them and i have no more spares in the car, and stealing is immoral to me" <<<<<<<<< admitting guitlt, therefore guilty of an offence, fine and points

as supposed to

"are you aware that your not displaying your p plates?"

"no i was not. i put my plates on before, checkd the tyres etc before i started driving..." then making a reason, legit or not <<<< not admitting guilt.

agreeing with sam here, but what safety measure is not showing your p plates doing? it means the fully licenced drivers respect you on the road, and not think of you as...how do i put this... "lower in the roads hierachy" than them.

i'm on greens, and the amount of times i've been yelled at, or beeped or flashed at for doing one little thing wrong, or being safer than normal

examples: turning right, waiting an etra 5 seconds for one lone car to pass through before going, got beeped and abused for being too slow

and a tazi swerved at me on anzac pde for accidentally going 75 in a 70 zone to slow me down. almost hit a merc

...

i agree with sam, but some laws and drivers really contradict the good nature or intention of most laws, while say when a red p plater does 90 on a highway, and gets passed by a road train doing 120-130, physics takes effects, and a nice big air cussion pushes the p plater off the road, its happened to me

/end essay

EDIT: $397 for red p curfew and thats it

koolio1234 · Post by **koolio1234** » Sun Jan 18, 2009 11:23 pm

thats funny, I've not been caught for not displaying my p's cos of luck i guess. But it feels good not to have to display them now that i am fully licensed.

da_msta_chizz · Post by **da_msta_chizz** » Sun Jan 18, 2009 11:47 pm

lawsochap wrote:contradict the good nature or intention of most laws, while say when a red p plater does 90 on a highway, and gets passed by a road train doing 120-130, physics takes effects, and a nice big air cussion pushes the p plater off the road, its happened to me

Can someone explain this to me as well?

Why are P-platers only limited to 90km/h, even though everyone young always stays up to past 12PM (i havn't slept in 2 days..), yet old ass drivers with no reflexes, dodgy eyes and always tired can do 110km/h legally?

Honestly, why only 90km/h?
What, is there a higher risk that you will crash or some other bullshit theory?

Post by **I8A4RE** » Mon Jan 19, 2009 8:18 am

Cause experience goes a long long long way. Plus with your idiot nieve young little brains, you all think your goddam V8 Supercar driver's when in actual fact you have about as much driving ability as a rock.

Honestly, why only 90km/h?
What, is there a higher risk that you will crash or some other bullshit theory?

No the risk is exactly the same......HIGH CHANCE. but at 90km you will do less damage to others, your passangers, and finally yourself. Which with the comments you have been making lately im sure no one would really care.

On side topic: 4yrs driving the FTO, one $60 fine for not having front plate

sublime19 · Post by **sublime19** » Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:21 am

I8A4RE wrote:Cause experience goes a long long long way. Plus with your idiot nieve young little brains, you all think your goddam V8 Supercar driver's when in actual fact you have about as much driving ability as a rock.

Honestly, why only 90km/h?
What, is there a higher risk that you will crash or some other bullshit theory?
No the risk is exactly the same......HIGH CHANCE. but at 90km you will do less damage to others, your passangers, and finally yourself. Which with the comments you have been making lately im sure no one would really care.

Gotta give it to you this time, nicely said

Tippin · Post by **Tippin** » Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:50 am

I8A4RE wrote:Cause experience goes a long long long way. Plus with your idiot nieve young little brains, you all think your goddam V8 Supercar driver's when in actual fact you have about as much driving ability as a rock.

Honestly, why only 90km/h?
What, is there a higher risk that you will crash or some other bullshit theory?
No the risk is exactly the same......HIGH CHANCE. but at 90km you will do less damage to others, your passangers, and finally yourself. Which with the comments you have been making lately im sure no one would really care.

On side topic: 4yrs driving the FTO, one $60 fine for not having front plate

lol this is so funny, i love seeing how u's respond to these questions hahaha

sublime19 · Post by **sublime19** » Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:58 am

And just quickly - Yea, there is actually a much higher chance of people crashing cars when they're younger, I can't remember the figures but they had it in the paper a while back, they listed age groups and the % of crashes, and the huge amount was younger males (under 25)

Post by **dstocks** » Mon Jan 19, 2009 1:38 pm

"lower in the roads hierachy" than them

havent you worked it out yet. You are........