High fuel consumption, and Idle problem...

General Questions and comments

Moderators: IMC, Club Staff

User avatar
jeremywe
Apprentice
Posts: 50
jedwabna poszewka promocja
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 6:00 pm

High fuel consumption, and Idle problem...

Post by jeremywe »

Hi guys, I just got myself a Tip GR.

I am getting like about 7 - 7.5km per litres(25% highway and i dont drag the car much). I have also noticed that my idle speed is about 1500 in neutral and about 600-800 in Drive. Is the idle extreamly high in neutral, or is this normal for an FTO?

I have this feeling that my high fuel consumption has something to do with the high idling speed.

By the way, the car is fitted with an aftermarket exhaust and and air intake, I dont suppose this results in such low fuel consumption... Or is an FTO supposed to drink fuel like this?

Hope someone can help me here... Thanks!
User avatar
GPXXX
Oldtimer
Posts: 3433
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: < the matrix >

Post by GPXXX »

450km seems pretty low-average, esp for a 60litre tank... how many litres were there left in the tank when you fill up?

i'm getting about 580kms max per fill (approx 57litres) but i do fang my manual GPX every now and then during the week and i only have basic breathing mods like exhaust and air filter so far.

the idle should be less than 1500rpm (unless you have aircon turned on). i'd get the stepper motor checked or get it serviced...
User avatar
FTO338
Oldtimer
Posts: 6712
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2003 6:00 pm
Location: Port Melbourne: Pimping with RX400h, B200 Turbo.

Post by FTO338 »

I get around 450km per tank as well, but i think that because the head was ported with adjustable fuel regulator.

From experinece air filter & exhaust shouldn't have much effect on your fuel consumption, unless your car is in really bad shape, e.g haven't done a tune up for a while.
DISCLAIMER: The above text is the personal opinion of the author and does not represent the indisputable truth. The author is not responsible for any deaths, injuries or mental illness caused by the above statments.
Jono
Mechanic
Posts: 747
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Post by Jono »

With tune ups.... is this when they plug in their computer into the ECU of the car?


sorry bout the dumb question :oops:

Jono
User avatar
GPXXX
Oldtimer
Posts: 3433
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: < the matrix >

Post by GPXXX »

Jono wrote:With tune ups.... is this when they plug in their computer into the ECU of the car?


sorry bout the dumb question :oops:

Jono
I believe up the term 'tuneup' is loosely based on another word for 'servicing'... ;)
User avatar
rxboy
Mechanic
Posts: 748
Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2003 6:00 pm
Location: SE Melbourne
Contact:

Post by rxboy »

7.5 km/L sounds about right. I get about 8 km/L with little or no freeway driving and no mods other than UAS pipe.
There are 10 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary and those that don't.
ruchi
Oldtimer
Posts: 1845
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by ruchi »

I think you get such good mileage Mikey coz you're a country bumpkin :P Not like us city folks with peak hour and lots of traffic lights.

When I checked today, my idle is the same in neutral and drive, both around 800rpm.
MIVEC is My Friend :D
User avatar
GPXXX
Oldtimer
Posts: 3433
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: < the matrix >

Post by GPXXX »

ruchi wrote:I think you get such good mileage Mikey coz you're a country bumpkin :P Not like us city folks with peak hour and lots of traffic lights.
hey i may be living out in the sticks but i only use 1/3 of my tank for hwy driving to and from Melb ok... the rest is just like normal day to day traffic when I'm in Melbourne, and when I'm not it's still the same where I live except with MUCH LESS traffic lights! :P:P

...in terms of fuel consumption, what we lack for in traffic lights here, i make up for it during my regular trips to the MIVEC zone! ;)
User avatar
jeremywe
Apprentice
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 6:00 pm

Post by jeremywe »

Hmm. Thanks for all the advice guys. Its not really 1500rpm when i re checked. Its about 1400 without the aircon on in neutral. with the aircon on, it drops about 300. Oh, and i just had it serviced (engine oil and filter changed)

Anyway, are there any good workshops in queensland that anyone could recommend me? I'm pretty new here so i'm not familiar with the pratices of the workshops. I don't wanna get ripped off or anything like that. What should i tell the workshop to check? Or should i just tell them about the problem and have them diagnose it for me?

Thanks !
Radium
Apprentice
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by Radium »

about 7km/L seems right to me! I'd be lucky to get more than that - mostly city driving though. I usually fill up about 50L after doing 350km.
User avatar
mrdj1234
Grease Monkey
Posts: 140
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: Wangaratta

Post by mrdj1234 »

(does some mental maths n stuff - I always used to work out economy in L/100km)

glad to see I'm not the only one stressing about how much fuel they drink... I get 450 ish to a tank :| at 102c/l it's an exxy tank of Optimax every time though :|

the missus gets nearly 15-20km/l in her car 8O

(then again, hers is an echo :idea: )
ruchi
Oldtimer
Posts: 1845
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by ruchi »

Have you tried the BP & Mobil equivilants to Optimax? Personally I have found it better, especially the BP one, and from some of the things I seen about Optimax I'll be staying away from it.
MIVEC is My Friend :D
User avatar
Teania
Mechanic
Posts: 697
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 6:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by Teania »

:?: Am I game to ask what you have heard/seen about Optimax? Working almost right on top of a petrol station, I run mine pretty much exclusively on it???

Have found Synergy 8000 pretty good - but didn;t have good run with the BP version...

Cheers
Tanya
ruchi
Oldtimer
Posts: 1845
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by ruchi »

When I first got my FTO I used to use Optimax as I could get the 4c discount with the Coles deal, but after having tried both the BP and Mobil equivilants, I wouldn't go back. I personally didn't think they'd be any difference, and was quite surprised when I tried them.

Without going into too much detail (trying to keep message short :wink:) I have heard the same information from a number of different sources that all the additives that Shell puts in the Optimax to supposedly clean your engine actually end up having a detrimental effect on it.

Someone on the FTO cruise last weekend also mentioned that the formula had changed, and the petrol is not the same as what they had when they did all the heavy advertising a few years back.

Like most things with cars, especially petrols, oils, treatments etc. I suggest you give it a go and see if you notice the difference. If you do great, if you don't then don't change. Personally I'll only use Optimax if I can't find a BP or Mobil, but the BP one is definitely my first choice.
MIVEC is My Friend :D
User avatar
dannyboyau
Veteran Mechanic
Posts: 979
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: that speck disappearing in the distance

Post by dannyboyau »

i am getting between 7.6 and 8 ks to the litre depending on how i drive it.
That is a 6A13T

anyone getting less than 8 ks with the 6A12 motor has a problem. one option is to get into a mitsi dealer who will be able to hook up to you computer and use there diagnostic computer to read what problems there are.
User avatar
FTO338
Oldtimer
Posts: 6712
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2003 6:00 pm
Location: Port Melbourne: Pimping with RX400h, B200 Turbo.

Post by FTO338 »

ruchi wrote: Without going into too much detail (trying to keep message short :wink:) I have heard the same information from a number of different sources that all the additives that Shell puts in the Optimax to supposedly clean your engine actually end up having a detrimental effect on it.
Yeah Theremin had posted this info on the forum before
Theremin wrote: Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2004 1:31 pm Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Just while we're on the subject, there is a discussion on another forum about the merits of BP Ultimate vs Shell Optimax...

http://board.performanceforums.com/foru ... d=67170167
DISCLAIMER: The above text is the personal opinion of the author and does not represent the indisputable truth. The author is not responsible for any deaths, injuries or mental illness caused by the above statments.
ruchi
Oldtimer
Posts: 1845
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by ruchi »

Thanks Kev, I hadn't seen that other forum, but it basically matches what I've heard from some mechanical mates.
MIVEC is My Friend :D
User avatar
kaveman
Grease Monkey
Posts: 179
Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by kaveman »

well, i use a mix of mobil 8000 and normal unleaded and can get about the same kilometers

good highway is 6.5l/100km

around city to and from work 9l/100km

and pushing it hard 12-13l/100km

i think it all come down to how you drive

robert
Adriano
Grease Monkey
Posts: 367
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: Sydney West

Post by Adriano »

my car seem to run better on BP ultimate than optimax... and i seem to be getting more ks out of it... i have used optimax for almost 1.5 years, and just recently moved to BP...
optimax has this very strong smell too, and can smell it when i have my windows down (though could be something wrong with my fuel lines :?: ).. but didnt smell anything when using BP....
so personally i'd use BP ultimate even though its a little bit pricier than optimax....
TheSentry
Grease Monkey
Posts: 328
Joined: Thu May 15, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: South West Sydney
Contact:

Post by TheSentry »

I switch between Optimax and Synergy based on pricing at the time, but I do believe my car feels better when running under Synergy. Feels slightly smoother and seems more eager to put the power down.
Post Reply