FTO's are fat

GPXXX · Post by **GPXXX** » Mon Feb 23, 2004 10:35 pm

ruchi wrote:Lets look at just one example, so I can keep the length of this email down (pleased about that Mikey?)

Nope...

here's a food for thought - Mitsubishi had intentions of producing the FTO in AWD, but somehow it never made it through to production... just imagine, FTO + AWD + turbo =

ruchi · Post by **ruchi** » Mon Feb 23, 2004 10:44 pm

FTO338 · Post by **FTO338** » Mon Feb 23, 2004 11:06 pm

ruchi wrote:wait 'til you read my reply to your 12" subwoofer question in the ICE section

So why u answer the question after a mth later? cause mikey already changed his mind about the subbie

GPXXX · Post by **GPXXX** » Mon Feb 23, 2004 11:07 pm

FTO338 wrote:
ruchi wrote:wait 'til you read my reply to your 12" subwoofer question in the ICE section
So why u answer the question after a mth later? cause mikey already changed his mind about the subbie

he wants to keep up his word count LoL...

ruchi · Post by **ruchi** » Mon Feb 23, 2004 11:11 pm

FTO338 · Post by **FTO338** » Mon Feb 23, 2004 11:13 pm

we know u doing a good thing ruchi but it is a bit pointless after more then a mth though.......

ruchi · Post by **ruchi** » Mon Feb 23, 2004 11:15 pm

FTO338 · Post by **FTO338** » Mon Feb 23, 2004 11:21 pm

The ICE post dude

ruchi · Post by **ruchi** » Mon Feb 23, 2004 11:24 pm

GPXXX · Post by **GPXXX** » Mon Feb 23, 2004 11:26 pm

alrighty then, let's stick to the topic ok fellas??

ruchi · Post by **ruchi** » Mon Feb 23, 2004 11:39 pm

FTO338 · Post by **FTO338** » Mon Feb 23, 2004 11:49 pm

Ok everyone start to dig all the old post that u had posted & make sure u tell ppl if u had changed your mind or u sold your FTO or what ever reason its no longer need to b reply.

Hows that?

And btw i never complaint about your long post, i was actually playing along with mikey as usual & u took it the wrong way.

ruchi · Post by **ruchi** » Mon Feb 23, 2004 11:52 pm

GPXXX · Post by **GPXXX** » Mon Feb 23, 2004 11:59 pm

hey hey hey, take it easy you two...

ruchi · Post by **ruchi** » Tue Feb 24, 2004 12:00 am

GPXXX · Post by **GPXXX** » Tue Feb 24, 2004 12:03 am

ruchi wrote:Oh, that message wasn't just for Kev.

"..............."

FTO338 · Post by **FTO338** » Tue Feb 24, 2004 12:04 am

ruchi wrote:
FTO338 wrote:Hows that? .
How's this: <expletive deleted>

Ohhh come on ruchi, why are u picking on me? i never complaint about u, & never said anything bad or using abusive language against u either.

Your long post is actually good for ppl like me, who had slow ISP, save me time going through the net, as someone already done it. So i've got nothing against it.

& stop taking it the wrong way.

GPXXX · Post by **GPXXX** » Tue Feb 24, 2004 12:36 am

ok this is getting stupid... stick to the topic or some rubbish here will see the sin bin...!

MADFTO · Post by **MADFTO** » Tue Feb 24, 2004 11:32 am

Eh, I always thought that they didn't product an AWD FTO because they didnt' want to cut into their lancer EVO/GSR sales.

Shows how much I know =)

Robb · Post by **Robb** » Tue Feb 24, 2004 4:43 pm

Mikey, Kev and Ruchi I think this thread has just made your "Post Count's" go thru the roof.... nice tactic boys

and here I was wondering how you guys get your counts so high...

spam a little here complain a little there bitch and winge, bitch and winge... I'm onto you guys now...

Robb...