fto mivec VS silvia 2ltr turbo

General Questions and comments

Moderators: IMC, Club Staff

Post Reply
User avatar
marco
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 6
jedwabna poszewka promocja
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: melb

fto mivec VS silvia 2ltr turbo

Post by marco »

Hay guys i need advice on how to take on this and
defeat this silvia. what mods should i do to defeat him, he
has only got air filter and 3inch from cat back?
any ideas??
Me no mods and triptronic mivec, what u think
User avatar
GPXXX
Oldtimer
Posts: 3433
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: < the matrix >

Post by GPXXX »

From experience, S13 Silvias can get low-mid 6s for the 0-100 with the abovementioned mods, whereas tiptronic FTOs in stock trim will need more work due to less torque and front drive configuration. The only thing I can suggest is a 50-75hp NOS setup, but these are illegal for road use... other than that, it also depends on your budget - you can do almost anything to a car as long as there's plenty of money in your pocket.

For example:

2.5" full exhaust
headers / extractors
air filter
enlarged throttle bodies
largers cams
stronger clutch
lighter flywheel
semi-slick tyres
weightstripping
NOS (!)
turbo (!!)
engine conversion (!!!)
Jeff
Grease Monkey
Posts: 230
Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2003 6:00 pm
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Post by Jeff »

The cheapest mod you can do for the best improvement is a POD fitler and an air intake pipe. The bend near the battery restrics the FTO markedly.
This will help a lot.
It still will not get you into the low 6`s but at least low 7`s or high 6`s.
Jeff
G1
Mechanic
Posts: 728
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: VW Bora V6 4Motion
Contact:

Post by G1 »

Jeff wrote:The cheapest mod you can do for the best improvement is a POD fitler and an air intake pipe. The bend near the battery restrics the FTO markedly.
This will help a lot.
It still will not get you into the low 6`s but at least low 7`s or high 6`s.
Jeff
not for a tiptronic, definitely not under 7
User avatar
hnm738
Grease Monkey
Posts: 232
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 5:00 pm

Post by hnm738 »

u say air intake pipe?


where can i get one of these? to get more air flowing in? i got a itg pod already? what else can i do to it

thanks
D-TRAIN
Mechanic
Posts: 589
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Post by D-TRAIN »

If you have a GPX, you can get an air intake chamber from ARC (replaces the black plastic intake tubing).

If you have a GR, you might need to get one custom made for the MAF sensor.

If you've got a Pod filter, it might be a good idea to get some heat shielding. In addition, you can get a cold-air ram setup from the front bumper.
User avatar
hnm738
Grease Monkey
Posts: 232
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 5:00 pm

Post by hnm738 »

ARC? what is that?

how much would it be for that pipe?

and what do you make heat shields out of?

thanks

i got the itg pod for 215$

was it a better idea to get that complete kit from UAS?

thanks
D-TRAIN
Mechanic
Posts: 589
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Post by D-TRAIN »

ARC is a Japanese tuning company: http://www.arcinter.co.jp/

The super chamber intake looks something like this:

Image

FunkyProduct (UK) sells some generic intake piping as well:

http://www.funkyproduct.co.uk/item.php? ... eNumber=78

Stephen has got his cold air intake and shield setup from UAS. Doesn't hurt paying them a visit I guess.
d_stroy_r
Mechanic
Posts: 730
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2003 6:00 pm
Location: WA
Contact:

Post by d_stroy_r »

i got a arc in-take chamber too. im just wondering how much power u get out of it?

The only difference is that mine has a heat shield around it (air filter).
User avatar
GPXXX
Oldtimer
Posts: 3433
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: < the matrix >

Post by GPXXX »

ok i'm not a physics junkie but wouldn't a 'chamber' in the intake path compromise the vacuum-effect from the intake by lowering the pressure??

how is a 'power chamber' any better than a conventional intake pipe??

hmmm...actually, save the physics lecture - it looks very cool and that's good enough!
D-TRAIN
Mechanic
Posts: 589
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Post by D-TRAIN »

OK, correct me if I'm wrong, but the vacuum (MAP) sensor for the GPX is located around the ISC right? This position is post intake pipe/chamber. So I don't think the sensor is measuring the volumetric pressure of the actual pipe/chamber.

I guess what ARC reckons the chamber will help is having excess air to be readily induced at the step of throttle.

I'm just having a stab in the dark here so don't take my word for it.

Maybe we should get Stephen to organise a chat session with a professional FTO tuner!!
Post Reply