itb's possible??
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 4:44 pm
i was just wondering as i have never seen an fto with an individual throttle body set up, are itb's possible on fto's??
Welcome to the f**king old FTO Australia forums!!
https://www.ftoaustralia.com/v3/
not point doing this mod by iteslf...waste of money.Storm wrote:RPW do a stage one, two and three conversion with ITBs to try and keep some low down driveablity. They also do twin TBs so have a look on their site. It makes you drool though so be warned.
Twins are more than just about top end horsepower. Don't forget throttle response and low end torque!SG wrote:should be enough for a 5-10kw gain?
twins have to put out more than that
Yup to the above, ITBs are really for racing cars which run at 90% throttle the full time. They look the dogs bolloxs but I wouldn't like to try and live with then for any length of time on a day to day basis. Having just done 450 miles in a little over 5 hours I would consider the car thrashed but it still sat at around 4K RPM most of the time, hardly enough to warrant ITBs for the other 364 days of the year.khunjeng wrote:not point doing this mod by iteslf...waste of money.Storm wrote:RPW do a stage one, two and three conversion with ITBs to try and keep some low down driveablity. They also do twin TBs so have a look on their site. It makes you drool though so be warned.
just bore out your TB and replace your existing intake pipe, pod and pipe form the grille...this should be enough.
its a crap idea for the FTO and a daily driven car.SG wrote:should be enough for a 5-10kw gain?
twins have to put out more than that
well i was thinking twins wouldnt be so bad with all of the other mods RPW recommends put together, no one in their right mind would upgrade their intake system to something like ITBs and leave everything else stockkhunjeng wrote:its a crap idea for the FTO and a daily driven car.SG wrote:should be enough for a 5-10kw gain?
twins have to put out more than that
its even crapper if thats all your gonna upgrade.
waste of money...will turn your car into a dog.
The M3 and M5 seem to do alright with the ITBs! The intake has been done to dealth with the FTO. All different types of intakes where power increase has been so small you wouldnt notice it, the induction roar gives you a sense of more power gain than there really is.Storm wrote:Yup to the above, ITBs are really for racing cars which run at 90% throttle the full time. They look the dogs bolloxs but I wouldn't like to try and live with then for any length of time on a day to day basis. Having just done 450 miles in a little over 5 hours I would consider the car thrashed but it still sat at around 4K RPM most of the time, hardly enough to warrant ITBs for the other 364 days of the year.khunjeng wrote:not point doing this mod by iteslf...waste of money.Storm wrote:RPW do a stage one, two and three conversion with ITBs to try and keep some low down driveablity. They also do twin TBs so have a look on their site. It makes you drool though so be warned.
just bore out your TB and replace your existing intake pipe, pod and pipe form the grille...this should be enough.
Still, they are desireable though.......
sorry mate I disagree. But I do agree that for the money the FTO doesn't really get much gain in comparision to other cars like a VTEC YO!!!!!-YO or a RB25.The exhuast and intake stock is bascially as good as you will get it. Focus on other areas imo, you'll get better gains.
The stock piping might be a piece of crap but it does the job. When you look at the FTO intake and exhaust even when its nothing special stock, its still a lot better than a lot of cars out there. The FTO has stock 2.5inch echuast system right? That big for a 2000CC car.khunjeng wrote:sorry mate I disagree. But I do agree that for the money the FTO doesn't really get much gain in comparision to other cars like a VTEC YO!!!!!-YO or a RB25.The exhuast and intake stock is bascially as good as you will get it. Focus on other areas imo, you'll get better gains.
The stock intake pipe is a piece of sh*t and the stock cat and muffler really suck...not to mention the down pipes..the extractors did give gains but for the bucks not as much as expected...But you wont get massive gains.
I'm intretsed to undertstand which "other areas" will give you better gains for the same bucks in a NA car?
Well honestly, that was one of the reason why i bought the FTO 5yrs ago, it looks good and it was "slow" but fast enough not to get beaten by your average rice up lancer, corolla or civic. (i'm talking rice, not performance). And like i said before, i bought it purely as a spare car for my mrs back then and I didn't want her to drive any of my other cars, as i think she might get into trouble with them.Liquidity wrote: I'm kind of glad they arent *stupidly* fast without, say, an engine transplant![]()
Besides, they look sooo much classier
hahah my FTO was bought for my Mrs also...its only now she gets to drive it...she wanted a spotrs car with auto....so a tip FTO was the best choice for the money/looks and performance. she loves the HIDs btw. its cool looking but not sue what any of this has to do with ITBs.FTO338 wrote:Well honestly, that was one of the reason why i bought the FTO 5yrs ago, it looks good and it was "slow" but fast enough not to get beaten by your average rice up lancer, corolla or civic. (i'm talking rice, not performance). And like i said before, i bought it purely as a spare car for my mrs back then and I didn't want her to drive any of my other cars, as i think she might get into trouble with them.Liquidity wrote: I'm kind of glad they arent *stupidly* fast without, say, an engine transplant![]()
Besides, they look sooo much classier
But in the end, i end up taking it over, as i start to modify it here and thereNow its gone for good