FTO AUSTRALIA

Posted: **Fri Jun 08, 2012 9:52 am**

http://smh.drive.com.au/motor-news/f1-s ... 1zxyk.html

I hate c&#ts like that... not only do they have the dough to buy a Lambo in the first place, but they'll spend the value of the car again, working it!

Posted: **Fri Jun 08, 2012 9:54 am**

Your totes jelly bro.

Gen Y grammar intentional.

Posted: **Fri Jun 08, 2012 10:27 am**

What happens if you sneeze and accidentally floor it in a school zone?

Or traffic?

Posted: **Fri Jun 08, 2012 10:27 am**

Supplanter wrote:Your totes jelly bro.

Gen Y grammar intentional.

Oh, thank hell.
Because for a second there...

Bennoz wrote:

http://smh.drive.com.au/motor-news/f1-s ... 1zxyk.html

I hate c&#ts like that... not only do they have the dough to buy a Lambo in the first place, but they'll spend the value of the car again, working it!

Thing is however, wouldn't you?

Posted: **Fri Jun 08, 2012 10:37 am**

Crazy

Sent from my Superdooper iPhone using Tapatalk!

Posted: **Fri Jun 08, 2012 11:08 am**

Supplanter wrote:Your totes jelly bro.

Gen Y grammar intentional.

What that hell is a tote? Did you mean your totem's jelly or something? WTF?! LOL it doesn't even make sense

Posted: **Fri Jun 08, 2012 2:21 pm**

Gholdwayne wrote:
Supplanter wrote:Your totes jelly bro.

Gen Y grammar intentional.
What that hell is a tote? Did you mean your totem's jelly or something? WTF?! LOL it doesn't even make sense

Gen X take on acronyms for Gen Y.
In which case, 'totes' would refer to 'totally', my good sir.

FYI, if you have NFI about dis, den ask a bro for the help u want. digg?

Posted: **Fri Jun 08, 2012 4:32 pm**

Astron_Boy wrote:
Gholdwayne wrote:
Supplanter wrote:Your totes jelly bro.

Gen Y grammar intentional.
What that hell is a tote? Did you mean your totem's jelly or something? WTF?! LOL it doesn't even make sense
Gen X take on acronyms for Gen Y.
In which case, 'totes' would refer to 'totally', my good sir.

FYI, if you have NFI about dis, den ask a bro for the help you want. digg?

It makes me sad that I figured out what NFI means (or I think I did) although I had NFI to begin with?
(correct me if I'm wrong).

Posted: **Fri Jun 08, 2012 4:39 pm**

bjk wrote:
Astron_Boy wrote:
Gholdwayne wrote:
Supplanter wrote:Your totes jelly bro.

Gen Y grammar intentional.
What that hell is a tote? Did you mean your totem's jelly or something? WTF?! LOL it doesn't even make sense
Gen X take on acronyms for Gen Y.
In which case, 'totes' would refer to 'totally', my good sir.

FYI, if you have NFI about dis, den ask a bro for the help you want. digg?
It makes me sad that I figured out what NFI means (or I think I did) although I had NFI to begin with?
(correct me if I'm wrong).

No correction needed Gen Y, you are correct.

Posted: **Sat Jun 09, 2012 7:53 pm**

Astron_Boy wrote:No correction needed Gen Y, you are correct.

sigg'd

Posted: **Sat Jun 09, 2012 8:01 pm**

So out of context, no longer funny.

Posted: **Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:20 pm**

Yeah.. this is like the equivalent of someone spending 100k+ on an FTO

Edit - Oh and here, I win http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HHz-INV ... plpp_video

Posted: **Sun Jun 10, 2012 3:27 pm**

Daniel2019 wrote:Yeah.. this is like the equivalent of someone spending 100k+ on an FTO

Edit - Oh and here, I win http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HHz-INV ... plpp_video

Wonder how many galleons per mile he gets?

Posted: **Sun Jun 10, 2012 3:31 pm**

Taz wrote:
Daniel2019 wrote:Yeah.. this is like the equivalent of someone spending 100k+ on an FTO

Edit - Oh and here, I win http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HHz-INV ... plpp_video
Wonder how many galleons per mile he gets?

4:24 - 5 miles per gallon

Posted: **Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:59 pm**

OH MY GOD, THE f**king MUSIC IS SO AMAZING. I MUST GO AND WATCH INCEPTION ANIMALS NOW.

FTO AUSTRALIA

0-100 in 2.2?

0-100 in 2.2?

Re: 0-100 in 2.2?

Re: 0-100 in 2.2?

Re: 0-100 in 2.2?

0-100 in 2.2?

Re: 0-100 in 2.2?

Re: 0-100 in 2.2?

Re: 0-100 in 2.2?

Re: 0-100 in 2.2?

Re: 0-100 in 2.2?

Re: 0-100 in 2.2?

Re: 0-100 in 2.2?

Re: 0-100 in 2.2?

Re: 0-100 in 2.2?

Re: 0-100 in 2.2?