Page 1 of 1
how many km's was your fto when you got it?
Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 9:57 pm
by maxleng
just want to sus out what number of km's was on the clock when you guys picked up your fto's
and also how common(rare?) is it for them to be wound back? i do realise they are digitally displayed but im guessing it is still possible? and how can one tell, if at all?
reason i ask is becuase there are a few at this dealer which have around 40k and 60k for 95 models. Haven't checked them out in person (quite far away from me). What should i ask from them to prove the km's are legit?
cheers
Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 10:42 pm
by koolio1234
this has been discussed several time before.
I got my '95 GPX with 122,990km on it last year. It wasnt driven much by the previous owner.
That means it was averaging less than 10,000km a year. That sounds quite low but reasonable as well.
The dealer your talking about selling a 14yr fto with 60,000km on it.
60,000/14 = 4285 km/yr ------> suspiciously low.
I think the mechanical speedos would be quite easy to wind back while the electronic speedos are harder but not impossible to crack.
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 12:26 am
by hugekim
If it's been recently imported from japan could you say "it's low km because japanese owners don't drive their cars very much/far."
Or is that total bs?
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 6:35 am
by mr-charisma
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 9:00 am
by FTEvolution
~50,000 km's, engine had done ~35,000
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 10:14 am
by dstocks
Mine had done 51K when i picked it up, but its a 99 model. Pretty sure that was genuine as it still had the service stickers on it. One of the others I grabbed had 16K on it and that was a prefacelift (Kaz has that one now), but that arrived in country in 99 and wasnt cmplied till this year.
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 10:14 am
by Cassf88
87000
i was so happy with the price i paid!!!
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 3:28 pm
by arkoso
220,000 1995. haha - wound forward?
I let my battery run flat the other day climate control settings went, as did the stereos settings i was just like damnit, why couldn't the odo' settings die aswell!
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 5:10 pm
by harry90
72000 when i got it. 83000 now.
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 5:41 pm
by maxleng
ah i see, was more interested in actually finding out about the low ks situation and whether they can be wound back, and just thought id ask how many ks as well
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 6:16 pm
by topao
98000 5 years ago, just hit the 140,000
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 7:39 pm
by khunjeng
maxleng wrote:
ah i see, was more interested in actually finding out about the low ks situation and whether they can be wound back, and just thought id ask how many ks as well
just a matter of getting a new cluster.
Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 4:05 am
by koolio1234
khunjeng wrote:maxleng wrote:
ah i see, was more interested in actually finding out about the low ks situation and whether they can be wound back, and just thought id ask how many ks as well
just a matter of getting a new cluster.
geez thats easier than i thought it would be.
Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 9:47 am
by khunjeng
koolio1234 wrote:khunjeng wrote:maxleng wrote:
ah i see, was more interested in actually finding out about the low ks situation and whether they can be wound back, and just thought id ask how many ks as well
just a matter of getting a new cluster.
geez thats easier than i thought it would be.
its easy.
Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 4:21 pm
by EURO
64 when i got mine in 2002/03; 160 now... 1995 model