Page 1 of 1

Not Bad

Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 9:55 pm
by dstocks
This one looks quite good on paper (or screen):

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/A-Mitsubishi-FTO ... dZViewItem

Re: Not Bad

Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 10:16 pm
by rock_it
dstocks wrote:This one looks quite good on paper (or screen):

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/A-Mitsubishi-FTO ... dZViewItem
Yeah saw that the other day ... 28,057 k's though ... You would want to see the service history and confirmation on that one...

Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 4:04 pm
by devil2004
I don't think it's a genuine version R. Just looks like a face lift with version R seats and wing on it.

I remember the Version R to having blue door trims and steel handles.

correct me if I'm wrong....

Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 4:11 pm
by JOeJOe
That car is advertised in the For Sale section.

It's a version r with no strut braces.

Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 4:29 pm
by khunjeng
I would prefer a GPX with all Type R running gear and facelift front so i got the CC.

Looks like a good car. Kms? hmm but if its in good nick, doesnt matter much.

Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 6:01 pm
by aza013
devil2004 wrote:I don't think it's a genuine version R. Just looks like a face lift with version R seats and wing on it.

I remember the Version R to having blue door trims and steel handles.

correct me if I'm wrong....
the Vr dos not have steel handles or blue door trims may be if it was a customer that asked for it dut not as standard.
and a lot of the times the car yards take off the strut braces they did with my one any way :evil:

More Likely

Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 8:13 pm
by dstocks
More likely the compliance shops actually. They dont know that the GpvR came with them standard (or dont have compliance test data to support them being left on)