sorry ive hadnt had time on the weekend to reply
@rock_it
the reason they would have got promoted is because they are good cops, so please dont take offense to what i am saying
i am just angry at the dickhead cops
i suppose a dickhead doing any job is horrible
but i am forced to interact with cops on a regular basis
so i suppose thats why i notice it
i will admit i am also slightly biased towards the negative view of cops because i have never read anything about a heroic cop in my local area instead i just hear about their corruption from a primary source
but despite that i will be polite to a polite cop
he will be treated the same way i am by him
if he is impolite and rude i will be the same
@j the good does outweigh the bad
but i think thats only because there are cops that will do almost no bad in their entire careers
i think what my mate got was a bit steep?
most people would just let that go as someone just being drunk
they might go up to them and tell them to settle down
but a massive fine seems a bit much to me
cops taking lives to me is wrong
i believe in capital punishment though
but that is because its a long thoughtout process whether the criminal deserves it or not
to be able to make that decision in 30 seconds is impossible
even if the killing is in self-defence it is still wrong
i like the use of stun guns these days, they provide an alternative
@koolio
sorry i always get off topic
i will see something that reminds me of something and then post a bit off topic and someone will reply and then i enjoy arguing and trying to prove my point so it will go back and forth for awhile until it gets completely off topic
happens in almost every thread that i post something more that "wttc"
anyway on the drink driving and rbts being illegal
The request must be made by a police officer, but note the officer does not have to be in uniform anymore to require a preliminary test (breath test), but he does have to be in uniform to administer it (unless after an accident then the police officer does not have to be in uniform for either the requirement or to administer any of the preliminary tests). The request can only be made if one of the following situations apply :-
the police officer has reasonable cause to suspect that you have committed, or are currently committing a moving traffic offence, or
if, having stopped, an officer has reasonable cause to suspect that the person driving/attempting to drive/in charge of the vehicle has consumed alcohol, or
the police officer has reasonable cause to believe that you were the person driving/attempting to drive/in charge of a motor vehicle which was involved in an accident.
So does that mean that the police can just stop your car if you are driving along and insist on giving you a roadside breath test? The answer is NO. They are entitled to randomly stop your car, but they can only insist on a breath test if they have reasonable cause to suspect you have committed a traffic offence, or have consumed alcohol (eg they can smell it on your breath), or they reasonably believe you have been involved in an accident (eg the description of your car matches that given by a witness).
that is UK laws though
not AU
but the reason they have those rules is because without reasonable suspicion to suspect that you are intoxicated they are violating your rights
police cant get a warrant to enter your house without suspicion
so they cant breathtest you either
in australia they ignore and blatantly violate your rights
i agree with RBT's
i just wanted to point out that they were wrong
but they are necessary
on drink-walking have a read of this
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/sout ... 5862262483
if you are over 0.15 your are to intoxicated to walk
and if they are lucky it will save 10 lives a year 0.000008% of the population
surely they can come up with a better way to save more lives rather than wasting there time here
and drink walking supposedly costs them $50 million a year
lets do some maths then
the population of adelaide is 1,158,259
26.7% are over 55
17.8% are under 15
that leaves 642833.745 or 55.5% of people between 55 and 15
studies show the most alcohol abusive part of the population are 16-24
so if we assume that adelaids population is spread evenly between 55 and 15 (it isnt, its an aging population so saying this is being generous) then its 128566.789 so about 11% of the population
which means that each person costs them about $400 a year?
thats bs to me
has to be an overexaggeration
majority of people wont cost a dime