The Suspension Thread
Moderators: IMC, Club Staff
- Vectose
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 3952
- jedwabna poszewka promocja
- Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 8:45 pm
- Location: Newcastle
Re: The Suspension Thread
Great work mate!
Bennoz wrote:A whoooole lot 'o jismTechnikhaus wrote:What is in said Bens big penis by the way?
- Shane001
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 2730
- Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:00 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
Re: The Suspension Thread
Also finally installed my Megan Racing control arms I bought from the US nearly a year ago
This was pretty straight forward. Just remove the stock arms, pre set the Megan Racing arms to approx the same length and then reinstall. You will require a wheel alignment after installing these, but they make adjusting toe and camber much easier obviously.
I managed to get the lengths pretty much spot on so the end result toe settings were almost unchanged.

This was pretty straight forward. Just remove the stock arms, pre set the Megan Racing arms to approx the same length and then reinstall. You will require a wheel alignment after installing these, but they make adjusting toe and camber much easier obviously.
I managed to get the lengths pretty much spot on so the end result toe settings were almost unchanged.
- Shane001
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 2730
- Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:00 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
Re: The Suspension Thread
And while I was at it I also installed my Selby 22mm rear sway bar complete with poly bushes. Just a touch thicker than the stock GPX 18mm unit
I decided to use the stock mounting brackets modified slightly for the larger bush brackets as this puts the mounting offsets in the right place. Basically I just used the existing bolt hole on the mounting bracket and then drilled a second for the Selby bush brackets. These held up no problems during testing at Wakefield Park this week.
Why not use the aftermarket brackets that come with the likes of the Whiteline kits? If you have a close look you'll see that the stock mounting brackets either side initially appear identitical. And the Whiteline type kit aftermarket brackets are also identical left to right.
Problem is, the stock brackets are actually not quite identical. The holes drilled to mount to the chassis are different left to right. This results in the left side bracket being slightly offset to the chassis. This is very important as this aligns with the straight section of the sway bar that the bush needs to mount to.
This picture illustrates why these aftermarket brackets fail. You can see clearly in the pic that the left side bracket is slightly twisted as the bush is mounting onto part of the bar that is starting to curve, not straight.
When you have a close look at the stock brackets it's amazing that Whiteline et al got these aftermarket brackets so wrong!

I decided to use the stock mounting brackets modified slightly for the larger bush brackets as this puts the mounting offsets in the right place. Basically I just used the existing bolt hole on the mounting bracket and then drilled a second for the Selby bush brackets. These held up no problems during testing at Wakefield Park this week.
Why not use the aftermarket brackets that come with the likes of the Whiteline kits? If you have a close look you'll see that the stock mounting brackets either side initially appear identitical. And the Whiteline type kit aftermarket brackets are also identical left to right.
Problem is, the stock brackets are actually not quite identical. The holes drilled to mount to the chassis are different left to right. This results in the left side bracket being slightly offset to the chassis. This is very important as this aligns with the straight section of the sway bar that the bush needs to mount to.
This picture illustrates why these aftermarket brackets fail. You can see clearly in the pic that the left side bracket is slightly twisted as the bush is mounting onto part of the bar that is starting to curve, not straight.
When you have a close look at the stock brackets it's amazing that Whiteline et al got these aftermarket brackets so wrong!
- Shane001
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 2730
- Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:00 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
Re: The Suspension Thread
With a bigger sway bar on the rear, this needed to be balanced with a bigger sway bar on the front.
I decided on a stock GPvR 20mm unit (up from the stock 16mm GPX). The challenge with this was that the GPvR uses a different drop link arrangement, and I couldn't source any GPvR lower control arms anywhere.
So I had my spare set of GPX control arms modified. As you can see from the pics, the GPvR and GPX control arms are identical, the only difference is the bracket for the drop links (and of course the post for the rear bush, but this didn't matter to me as I just reused the GPX bush). So I had my local fabricator weld on a set! Cost me $120 total and the end result you wouldn't tell the difference, except he used a slightly thicker metal
Modified GPX control arms.
And fitted with new GPvR drop links.
And the money it cost to have the brackets welded on was saved in not having to buy another rear bush for the control arm, I was able to reuse my offset GPX poly bush. Also refitted with existing front poly bushes.
Next challenge was finding the correct poly bushes for the 20mm sway bar. The GPvR bar actually uses a different bush bracket to the GPX and other models. It mounts exactly the same, it's just a little taller to accomodate the thicker bar. Problem was I didn't have these brackets and no one has a listing for a poly bush for the 20mm sway bar with these larger brackets.
So I ended up using the SuperFlex listed poly bush for a 20mm bar with the GPX bracket. Part number is SPF1344-20K. I was a bit worried using these initially as they are a little wider than the bracket, but once fitted they were nice and tight so alls good
Yeah I got a bit carried away with the lube on these bushes
I decided on a stock GPvR 20mm unit (up from the stock 16mm GPX). The challenge with this was that the GPvR uses a different drop link arrangement, and I couldn't source any GPvR lower control arms anywhere.
So I had my spare set of GPX control arms modified. As you can see from the pics, the GPvR and GPX control arms are identical, the only difference is the bracket for the drop links (and of course the post for the rear bush, but this didn't matter to me as I just reused the GPX bush). So I had my local fabricator weld on a set! Cost me $120 total and the end result you wouldn't tell the difference, except he used a slightly thicker metal

Modified GPX control arms.
And fitted with new GPvR drop links.
And the money it cost to have the brackets welded on was saved in not having to buy another rear bush for the control arm, I was able to reuse my offset GPX poly bush. Also refitted with existing front poly bushes.
Next challenge was finding the correct poly bushes for the 20mm sway bar. The GPvR bar actually uses a different bush bracket to the GPX and other models. It mounts exactly the same, it's just a little taller to accomodate the thicker bar. Problem was I didn't have these brackets and no one has a listing for a poly bush for the 20mm sway bar with these larger brackets.
So I ended up using the SuperFlex listed poly bush for a 20mm bar with the GPX bracket. Part number is SPF1344-20K. I was a bit worried using these initially as they are a little wider than the bracket, but once fitted they were nice and tight so alls good

Yeah I got a bit carried away with the lube on these bushes

- Sahin
- HULK
- Posts: 5519
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 10:38 pm
- Location: Up to me nuts in boys guts
The Suspension Thread
Get excited installing that, did you Shane?
- Shane001
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 2730
- Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:00 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
Re: The Suspension Thread
Sahin wrote:Get excited installing that, did you Shane?

Last edited by Shane001 on Fri Aug 03, 2012 11:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Sahin
- HULK
- Posts: 5519
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 10:38 pm
- Location: Up to me nuts in boys guts
The Suspension Thread
Taking the piss about how much lube you did use
Looks good though should handle better now?
Looks good though should handle better now?
- PHIL069
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 4719
- Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:00 pm
- Location: Central Coast > South Australia
Re: The Suspension Thread
Great pics Shane and you know your stuff. It would have taken a while to do all that work.
What are the extra springs on your rear shocks, the ones underneath the coil springs?
What are the extra springs on your rear shocks, the ones underneath the coil springs?
mikeey01nzl wrote:Hats off to you too Phil for spending so much time on the phone trying to help someone out, your a top man and only a few would've spent so much time. well done!![]()
Daniel2019 wrote:Come on phil, we bonded at the bonfire, lets be honest here...me and phil are besties now...![]()
- Shane001
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 2730
- Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:00 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
Re: The Suspension Thread
Mostly just learn it as I goPHIL069 wrote:Great pics Shane and you know your stuff. It would have taken a while to do all that work.
What are the extra springs on your rear shocks, the ones underneath the coil springs?

Figured my experiences might come in useful for anyone else wanting to do similar, especially with pressing bushes.
Can't remember exactly what they're called, but you'll find that setup on a lot of higher spec and race coilovers. From memory it's to reduce spring bounce. Helps to keep the springs seated under extreme conditions. They came standard with my very used Tein Type HA's

- Shane001
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 2730
- Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:00 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
Re: The Suspension Thread
TBH jury is still out on the handling, front felt much better but the rear was very 'slippery', increased tendency to snap oversteer.Sahin wrote:Looks good though should handle better now?
But there were other factors going on as well so I wasn't really focused on handling this week. But I'm suspecting the 22mm on the rear may actually be too much. I'm planning to test the 22mm with the 18mm back to back next time I go to WP. Truth will be in the lap times

- Sahin
- HULK
- Posts: 5519
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 10:38 pm
- Location: Up to me nuts in boys guts
The Suspension Thread
Oh, good luck, hope you find out what works best for you.
- Shane001
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 2730
- Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:00 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
Re: The Suspension Thread
Some more interesting info.
The GPvR & GPX front sub frames are essentially identical, and therefore interchangeable. The GPvR subframe however has a lot of extra bracing as you can see in the pics below.
Even the recess for the lower control rear bush is the same, even though the GPX & GPvR bushes themselves are very different. GPvR top / GPX bottom.
I'm planning an engine change later this year and considering installing the GPvR frame. The trade off is the extra weight. I haven't directly weighed them but I reckon there'll be close to an additional 5kgs in the GPvR sub frame.
Less weight vs extra bracing? hmmm...
The GPvR & GPX front sub frames are essentially identical, and therefore interchangeable. The GPvR subframe however has a lot of extra bracing as you can see in the pics below.
Even the recess for the lower control rear bush is the same, even though the GPX & GPvR bushes themselves are very different. GPvR top / GPX bottom.
I'm planning an engine change later this year and considering installing the GPvR frame. The trade off is the extra weight. I haven't directly weighed them but I reckon there'll be close to an additional 5kgs in the GPvR sub frame.
Less weight vs extra bracing? hmmm...
Last edited by Shane001 on Sat Aug 04, 2012 10:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Vectose
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 3952
- Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 8:45 pm
- Location: Newcastle
Re: The Suspension Thread
That's probably what Mitsubishi were thinking when they decided to remove the climate control and folding mirrors from the GPvRShane001 wrote:Less weight vs extra bracing? hmmm...

Bennoz wrote:A whoooole lot 'o jismTechnikhaus wrote:What is in said Bens big penis by the way?
- Shane001
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 2730
- Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:00 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
Re: The Suspension Thread
Yep, offsetting the extra weight in the subframeVectose wrote:That's probably what Mitsubishi were thinking when they decided to remove the climate control and folding mirrors from the GPvRShane001 wrote:Less weight vs extra bracing? hmmm...

- PHIL069
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 4719
- Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:00 pm
- Location: Central Coast > South Australia
Re: The Suspension Thread
But then they added 5kg extra in the sub frame, so how can the GPvR be overall lighter? The climate control less manual control weight + folding mirrors less non-folding weight would not = 5Kg.Vectose wrote:That's probably what Mitsubishi were thinking when they decided to remove the climate control and folding mirrors from the GPvRShane001 wrote:Less weight vs extra bracing? hmmm...
mikeey01nzl wrote:Hats off to you too Phil for spending so much time on the phone trying to help someone out, your a top man and only a few would've spent so much time. well done!![]()
Daniel2019 wrote:Come on phil, we bonded at the bonfire, lets be honest here...me and phil are besties now...![]()
- Sahin
- HULK
- Posts: 5519
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 10:38 pm
- Location: Up to me nuts in boys guts
The Suspension Thread
I wouldn't be surprised actually
Those mirrors are heavy
Those mirrors are heavy
- Shane001
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 2730
- Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:00 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
Re: The Suspension Thread
Yep, electric mirrors are heavy, plus I'm sure there's other stuff not included in the GPvR.
From memory I read somewhere no sound deadener?
From memory I read somewhere no sound deadener?
- Daniel2019
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 7957
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:25 pm
- Location: Sydney!
- Contact:
Re: The Suspension Thread
But they also added things to the vR, too.
I fix cars.
Bennoz wrote:I got Bali beli & sharted on my phone. But it was fun
bjk wrote:you old people are no help at all.
- zuihoujueding
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 5:00 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: The Suspension Thread
I remember reading from some website, maybe from nolathane, that the grease should only be applied on the internal surface of the bush (where it is in contact with the sway bar, and not anywhere else.
- Taz
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 3995
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:50 am
- Location: Your mothers house
Re: The Suspension Thread
no sound deadening, electric mirrors, climate control, spoiler would be slightly less heavy (however small) and youll probably find the suspension changes would weigh that little but less as well. Big thing being the deadener

Bennoz wrote: Cum gunt it!