Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 2:11 pm
the 100 octane is another 3 or 4 cents more depends where you get itJOeJOe wrote:What's the pricing like compared to the normal 98RON?
FTO AUSTRALIA
Welcome to the f**king old FTO Australia forums!!
https://www.ftoaustralia.com/v3/
Shell new High Octane Fuel: V-Power
Page 2 of 4
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 3:22 am
hey guys, this v-racing is definitely good
on my evo, apparently it is tuned for 100ron, compared to other 98ron i've used, which usually give me about 340km per tank (53L)
with the v-racing, i was able to get about 380 per tank!
and performance wise definitely noticeably smooter acceleration across the rev range.
some guy also had a dyno comparing the fuels, now i jsut gotta find it.
on my evo, apparently it is tuned for 100ron, compared to other 98ron i've used, which usually give me about 340km per tank (53L)
with the v-racing, i was able to get about 380 per tank!
and performance wise definitely noticeably smooter acceleration across the rev range.
some guy also had a dyno comparing the fuels, now i jsut gotta find it.
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 10:02 am
u get less than 6.5L a tank dude... wtf?!
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 1:49 pm
LOL our last NSW cruise was dictated by his fuel stops 
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 3:02 pm
Why does he chew up fuel so much? Is it the way you drive? Or is it just the car?
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 7:03 pm
its an EVO! most reviews give them 16-20 per 100kms... you cant expect great performance without fuel use....
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 9:36 pm
yeah my skyline gets outstanding fuel ecc. compared to mates in the club. I get about 450-500 max...from 60l...most get 350.EURO wrote:its an EVO! most reviews give them 16-20 per 100kms... you cant expect great performance without fuel use....
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 11:58 pm
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 12:47 pm
Ok so in technical terms, why does it chew up so much fuel say compared to Chris' Skyline which is a 3.0L V6 and runs a f*ckload of boost?
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 12:55 pm
Chris Skyline is RB25DET, so its 2.5L straight 6 not 3.0L or V6. 
Haven't you seen the Toyota ad with Mr. T "Power without efficiency, isn't power"
It’s pretty simple, you got a little engine that pulls the same power of a larger one, so of course it’s going to use more petrol. Plus it’s an AWD, which need more power to run it and yes that mean fuel.
Haven't you seen the Toyota ad with Mr. T "Power without efficiency, isn't power"
It’s pretty simple, you got a little engine that pulls the same power of a larger one, so of course it’s going to use more petrol. Plus it’s an AWD, which need more power to run it and yes that mean fuel.
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 1:17 pm
Sh*t! 3.0L V6 is out of the GTO... 
I always did think he had an RB26 for some reason.
Anyway I'm tipping that the Skyline would be heavier than the EVO so based on all those factors it sounds like it chews up petrol coz of the way it's driven...
I always did think he had an RB26 for some reason.
Anyway I'm tipping that the Skyline would be heavier than the EVO so based on all those factors it sounds like it chews up petrol coz of the way it's driven...
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 4:52 pm
hey guys
the car chews on petrol alright
it runs AWD and boost at 20psi
the car chews on petrol alright
it runs AWD and boost at 20psi
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 4:58 pm
Does that mean if you lower the boost then it will improve your fuel economy?
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 5:59 pm
oh nacho
my fuel consumption is not becoz of the way i drive...
most of the time i dont drive up to the boost point which is about 4k
i usually take it up to 3.2k when bost start to spool
so...300+km from one tank is from granny driving...
to give u an idea...at wake field, i do about 220km before petrol light shows
my fuel consumption is not becoz of the way i drive...
most of the time i dont drive up to the boost point which is about 4k
i usually take it up to 3.2k when bost start to spool
so...300+km from one tank is from granny driving...
to give u an idea...at wake field, i do about 220km before petrol light shows
Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:52 pm
it has been in malaysia and singapore for more than 5 years... its to my surprise when i come to australia last year that they use "optimax" but not "V-power".mxysxy wrote:This is just another bogus marketing campaign of Shell,
V-Power is not a new thing,
It’s been in Europe for a long time,
I know in Turkey for over 3-4 years.
I think they simply introducing the V-Power to reduce the market share of BP Ultimate and Caltex high octane stuff,
Shell has failed with Optimax and trying to patch it now,
I honestly think that Optimax and V-Power is the same sh*t, just renaming it to sound it more sophisticated.
Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 10:07 pm
I have filled up the tank with VPower racing stuff yesterday,
To be honest it feels little better, and the sound of the exhaust has changed slightly, not sure if I'm imagining though.
Now about the Optimax, if you have a look at the bowser at the station, there is a sticker there that outlines the petrol they sell, and it actually says that Optimax is V-Power.
So, it is a really rebranding by renaming of Optimax
I reckon I will give 100octane a go for a while. It was $1.28 pre litre, which is pretty ok.
However, ir BP comes up with 100 octane, I would definately switch to that
I just dislike Shell
To be honest it feels little better, and the sound of the exhaust has changed slightly, not sure if I'm imagining though.
Now about the Optimax, if you have a look at the bowser at the station, there is a sticker there that outlines the petrol they sell, and it actually says that Optimax is V-Power.
So, it is a really rebranding by renaming of Optimax
I reckon I will give 100octane a go for a while. It was $1.28 pre litre, which is pretty ok.
However, ir BP comes up with 100 octane, I would definately switch to that
I just dislike Shell
Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 10:42 pm
Hey Max did you fill it up after you empty your tank or at some other level?
Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 9:52 am
Red light was on,FTO338 wrote:Hey Max did you fill it up after you empty your tank or at some other level?
Took about 54 litres
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:56 pm
Hrrm,
Anyone use Boost fuel? from United
I have been using this for the last 10 re-fuels and it seems identical to the BP ultimate I have always used. Although it has ethynol?
Not that I go sniffing fuels, but do you guys notice each company seems to have differnt smelling fuels? WHen I had older cars, Woolworths smelt like rotting vegies.. fishers had a different bad stink.
Always gone to BP since trying the other places the 323 ran like crap.
Anyone use Boost fuel? from United
I have been using this for the last 10 re-fuels and it seems identical to the BP ultimate I have always used. Although it has ethynol?
Not that I go sniffing fuels, but do you guys notice each company seems to have differnt smelling fuels? WHen I had older cars, Woolworths smelt like rotting vegies.. fishers had a different bad stink.
Always gone to BP since trying the other places the 323 ran like crap.
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 5:06 pm
fto tank can take 54 litres? lol
when my dial is sitting at E i get 40 litres in but ive never seen fuel light come on
when my dial is sitting at E i get 40 litres in but ive never seen fuel light come on