Page 2 of 3

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:15 pm
by barfy
But thats it, its not really a whoshing noise its more of a flapping noise...

its hard to explain...

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:36 pm
by BuCkEt
Bird stuck in the intake? :lol:


But seriously.....maybe have one of the S.A boys to have a look if they're free or at the next meet?

Something might be loose inside your engine bay.

One thing I've noticed with my extractors is that they're rather raspy once I hop off the throttle....but never when I'm accelerating. :?

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:54 pm
by Bennoz
Yeah - on decelleration its usually the flex section (just before the cat) that cavatates. Easy fixed with a bit of exhaust wrap.

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:58 pm
by barfy
Ill just get the high flow cat and some sort of forced induction then get the emange and see what its like then ...

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 1:17 pm
by BuCkEt
and some sort of forced induction
8O

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 5:21 pm
by frayli
I had to fill up with normal ulp once when the premium was out of order was dead empty as well, i was careful not to hammer it but didnt have any pinging whatsoever wats the compression of FTO's 10:0? i dont think low ron fuel is as bad as you guys are sayng unless its tuned for 98. i know our audi is 11:0 and it does ping with ulp a half mix sorts it out though.

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 5:55 pm
by MADFTO
Yeah the 6A12 has a comp ratio of 10:1.

Engines won't be happy in any sort of pinging situation. There's only so much an ECU can do to retard timing with such a high comp ratio.

Must remember, engines are designed with event occuring in order, if something goes whack, the engine will be able to put up with some abuse, but not for any long length of time.

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 6:52 pm
by Slither
frayli wrote:I had to fill up with normal ulp once when the premium was out of order was dead empty as well, i was careful not to hammer it but didnt have any pinging whatsoever wats the compression of FTO's 10:0? i dont think low ron fuel is as bad as you guys are sayng unless its tuned for 98. i know our audi is 11:0 and it does ping with ulp a half mix sorts it out though.
Considering that GPX's are designed to run on 100ron MINIMUM running regular is not good for the engine, you may not get much pinging but that doesn't mean there's nothing wrong.

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 9:51 pm
by khunjeng
does anyone use any addatives to increase 98 to 100??

Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2005 9:20 am
by frayli
yeah but designed to run and will run on are 2 different things, what damage can 95 ron fuel do if it isnt pinging? all we are talking about is a fuel being ignited, the ecu learns what petrol is being ignited and since we have only just come across 100 ron fuel and gpx's have been in the country at least since 98, im not flaming you at all just in case someone who has had their fto and run it on less than 100 ron fuel wont get all excited and get an engine rebuild.

Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2005 11:55 am
by EURO
Isnt one concern with 95 or less RON that we do not necessarily know what additives they are using to make up the other 5% ?

Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2005 12:03 pm
by FTO338
frayli wrote:yeah but designed to run and will run on are 2 different things, what damage can 95 ron fuel do if it isnt pinging? all we are talking about is a fuel being ignited, the ecu learns what petrol is being ignited and since we have only just come across 100 ron fuel and gpx's have been in the country at least since 98, im not flaming you at all just in case someone who has had their fto and run it on less than 100 ron fuel wont get all excited and get an engine rebuild.
Isn't this like saying cars are design to run on normal full size tyres but it will run on those yellow 13" spare :?

Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2005 12:50 pm
by AERODYNAMIST
dont really understand what is going on :oops: but is that mean shell optimax is a NO?

Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:04 pm
by BuCkEt
FTO338 wrote:
frayli wrote:yeah but designed to run and will run on are 2 different things, what damage can 95 ron fuel do if it isnt pinging? all we are talking about is a fuel being ignited, the ecu learns what petrol is being ignited and since we have only just come across 100 ron fuel and gpx's have been in the country at least since 98, im not flaming you at all just in case someone who has had their fto and run it on less than 100 ron fuel wont get all excited and get an engine rebuild.
Isn't this like saying cars are design to run on normal full size tyres but it will run on those yellow 13" spare :?
I like your thinking! :wink:

Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2005 2:47 pm
by WildRide
Tell you what.
I'll fill up with a tank before the Daylsford cruise next weekend.

See how it hoes :?

WR

Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2005 3:10 pm
by FTO338
According to Mitsubishi Japan, the FTO need at least traveled 100km before the any new fuel will take effect.

So few lappy at Albert Park first W.R :wink:

Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2005 3:32 pm
by WildRide
You mean I'm going to have to do laps of albert park

Oh noes!!!! :twisted:

More likely I'll just take it easy for the first 100 klicks out.
It's a big cruise.

WR

Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2005 6:13 pm
by paladin
100 ron isnt always as it seems (see LPG cars!)

thing to be careful with ethinl is its a bit like LPG its got a high ron rating but doesnt 'produces less usable energy because it burns shorter then propaine as anyone whos driven a lpg car can tell you. this mean you actally lose power but gain in ethicencey and 'your engine, as long as it can handel the heat (like say a jap import..) will actually run smother and cleaner.




dont mistake 100 ron ethonol or lpg for 100 ron extream/aero fuel you can generally only ger on the drag track.

Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2005 8:13 pm
by frayli
although u can boost LPG pretty high before it pings because of the high octane i know a lot of people have gone straight LPG

Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2005 8:48 pm
by paladin
just tryed it out (30kms of driving after a 59l fill up)
it makes a smell like metho, very faint but its there. more importently i felt a improvment in low end toque (most notacible when climing the driveway at low rpm to keep the noise down...) and she is a tiny bit mroe willing to get to the top end but i would not say it was stronger in the top end, more responsive but not as much push.
but this may be because its more fluent as the mivec switch is less noticable (i am guessing this is because hte ron means it is burning less lean)

3c/l more then opti making it 13c more then std