Almost read that as 'my engine bay' lol.aza013 wrote:I'm interested to see what this would get out of it.
And it would look good sitting in the engine bay.
12 ROTOR MONSTER! Be jelly!
Moderators: IMC, Club Staff
- Astron_Boy
- Trolling Gen Y
- Posts: 8400
- jedwabna poszewka promocja
- Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 5:00 pm
- Location: Wine Country NSW
- Contact:
Re: 12 ROTOR MONSTER! Be jelly!

- aza013
- NSW Coordinator
- Posts: 9089
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 5:00 pm
- Location: The Shire
- Contact:
Re: 12 ROTOR MONSTER! Be jelly!



- Sahin
- HULK
- Posts: 5519
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 10:38 pm
- Location: Up to me nuts in boys guts
12 ROTOR MONSTER! Be jelly!
Better start polishing
- Kustom
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 6144
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 5:00 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: 12 ROTOR MONSTER! Be jelly!
Incase you missed it azaza013 wrote:I'm interested to see what this would get out of it.
And it would look good sitting in the engine bay.

Naturally aspirated on 87 octane pump fuel this thing is said to make 1440hp and 900ft.lbs of torque and will do so for 400 hours of use. With the wick wound up and a bit of boost thrown into the mix, it is capable of an incredible 3600hp!

Taz wrote:When funds allow
- aza013
- NSW Coordinator
- Posts: 9089
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 5:00 pm
- Location: The Shire
- Contact:
Re: 12 ROTOR MONSTER! Be jelly!
May be so but are these number with the engine in a car and tested at the wheel?
They sound like engine numbers.
They sound like engine numbers.
- fraz91
- Hair-do
- Posts: 881
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 6:00 pm
- Location: 4wding over you, Sydney
Re: 12 ROTOR MONSTER! Be jelly!
I'm guessing those are engine figures. I'd hate to think of the losses through the gearbox that handles all that power and torque... 

I'll have an FTO one day... i swear!
until then:
1. 2001 Merc-Benz A160 (porta-loo on wheels)
2. 2007 Peugeot 307 TDi (more fun than you'd expect)
3. [url=ttp://ftoaustralia.com/v3/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=25373]2009 Mitsubishi Triton Di-D (a monster in its own right)[/url]
4. 1992 Nissan NX Coupe (club car and project car)
5. 1996 Holden SB Barina - "The Nugget"
6. 1996 Jeep XJ Cherokee Sport - The Budget Build
7. 2010 Toyota Landcruiser 76 Series - V8 Goodness... - Build coming soon.
8. 1990 Audi 90 manual - The delightfully dignified daily driver
until then:
1. 2001 Merc-Benz A160 (porta-loo on wheels)
2. 2007 Peugeot 307 TDi (more fun than you'd expect)
3. [url=ttp://ftoaustralia.com/v3/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=25373]2009 Mitsubishi Triton Di-D (a monster in its own right)[/url]
4. 1992 Nissan NX Coupe (club car and project car)
5. 1996 Holden SB Barina - "The Nugget"
6. 1996 Jeep XJ Cherokee Sport - The Budget Build
7. 2010 Toyota Landcruiser 76 Series - V8 Goodness... - Build coming soon.
8. 1990 Audi 90 manual - The delightfully dignified daily driver
Astron_Boy wrote:No correction needed Gen Y, you are correct.
Bennoz wrote:My rubbing happens on the inside.
- Tippin
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 1663
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 6:00 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: 12 ROTOR MONSTER! Be jelly!
yeh id like to see what kind of driveshaft handles 3600hp going to the wheels 

- Bennoz
- National President
- Posts: 23676
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:00 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
Re: 12 ROTOR MONSTER! Be jelly!
Fkn eggbeaters... Can't beat a crankshaft!

- ZFL45H1
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 1830
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 6:00 pm
- Location: Albury
- Kustom
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 6144
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 5:00 pm
- Location: Brisbane
- Jase726
- Grease Monkey
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 4:11 am
Re: 12 ROTOR MONSTER! Be jelly!
Old post I know but that video just gave me goosebumps. But then again anything rotary related usually does. Aint nothing like a rotary...
- Daniel2019
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 7957
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:25 pm
- Location: Sydney!
- Contact:
Re: 12 ROTOR MONSTER! Be jelly!
Realise this is an old thread but.. dude.. what.Taz wrote:Engine doesnt really matter when it comes to the top speed records
Does that mean I can chuck in the engine from my barina into the most aerodynamic shell possible and I will break speed records?
You need a combination of both a great engine and aerodynamics. The engine absolutely does matter.
Example - what has a higher top speed - the Veyron or a Zonda?
The Veyron. Why? Because of its engine.
I fix cars.
Bennoz wrote:I got Bali beli & sharted on my phone. But it was fun
bjk wrote:you old people are no help at all.
- Taz
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 3995
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:50 am
- Location: Your mothers house
Re: 12 ROTOR MONSTER! Be jelly!
Anything else you would like to take out of context to try and attack me with?
My point is valid. Beyond a certain threshhold the engine cant do much more if anything when aero/the laws of physics prevents you going any faster..
My point is valid. Beyond a certain threshhold the engine cant do much more if anything when aero/the laws of physics prevents you going any faster..

Bennoz wrote: Cum gunt it!
- ZFL45H1
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 1830
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 6:00 pm
- Location: Albury
Re: 12 ROTOR MONSTER! Be jelly!
Guarantee that u out the vayron engine in a truck and race it with the zonda who do u think would win both top speed and acceleration areo does account for heaps at these speeds
gotta get there one day :)
- Sahin
- HULK
- Posts: 5519
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 10:38 pm
- Location: Up to me nuts in boys guts
Re: 12 ROTOR MONSTER! Be jelly!
Not to mention the truck which would be a good 10 tonne heavier and way smaller gear ratios, fair race I'd say...ZFL45H1 wrote:Guarantee that u out the vayron engine in a truck and race it with the zonda who do u think would win both top speed and acceleration areo does account for heaps at these speeds
- ZFL45H1
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 1830
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 6:00 pm
- Location: Albury
Re: 12 ROTOR MONSTER! Be jelly!
Sahin wrote:Not to mention the truck which would be a good 10 tonne heavier and way smaller gear ratios, fair race I'd say...ZFL45H1 wrote:Guarantee that u out the vayron engine in a truck and race it with the zonda who do u think would win both top speed and acceleration areo does account for heaps at these speeds

gotta get there one day :)
- Daniel2019
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 7957
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:25 pm
- Location: Sydney!
- Contact:
Re: 12 ROTOR MONSTER! Be jelly!
Im not attacking you at all mate, calm your nips. Im not taking anything out of context at all, simply going off your quote. I do understand your point, but what I'm saying is, both the engine and aerodynamics are equally as important as each other. You need both.Taz wrote:Anything else you would like to take out of context to try and attack me with?
My point is valid. Beyond a certain threshhold the engine cant do much more if anything when aero/the laws of physics prevents you going any faster..
Absolutely you are correct in saying that aerodynamics plays a big part in this, no dispute there at all. But as does the engine. A combination of the two is needed.
Once the performance capabilities of an engine have been maxed out, that is when aerodynamics are the only way of improving a top speed record.
Put it this way, the best engine in the world in a not so aerodynamic car/vehicle (such as the Vauxhall Victor in the UK that runs like a 7.3 1/4 mile - quoted as being as aerodynamic as a brick

Yes, you do need aerodynamics, no disagreement there, but again, the engine has to be up to par as well.
I fix cars.
Bennoz wrote:I got Bali beli & sharted on my phone. But it was fun
bjk wrote:you old people are no help at all.
- ZFL45H1
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 1830
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 6:00 pm
- Location: Albury
Re: 12 ROTOR MONSTER! Be jelly!
Im sorry I still dont agreeDaniel2019 wrote: Put it this way, the best engine in the world in a not so aerodynamic car/vehicle (such as the Vauxhall Victor in the UK that runs like a 7.3 1/4 mile - quoted as being as aerodynamic as a brick) is going to be faster than a car/vehicle with a good, but not amazing engine such as the Mclaren F1.

gotta get there one day :)
- Daniel2019
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 7957
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:25 pm
- Location: Sydney!
- Contact:
Re: 12 ROTOR MONSTER! Be jelly!
Bad example, they run similar engine powers and Victor 1 is set for acceleration.ZFL45H1 wrote:Im sorry I still dont agreeDaniel2019 wrote: Put it this way, the best engine in the world in a not so aerodynamic car/vehicle (such as the Vauxhall Victor in the UK that runs like a 7.3 1/4 mile - quoted as being as aerodynamic as a brick) is going to be faster than a car/vehicle with a good, but not amazing engine such as the Mclaren F1.
Point is, you cant just have an amazing engine for top speed, and you cant just have aerodynamics for top speed..
You need both!
Ok, Veyron vs Mclaren F1. Mclaren is more aerodynamic but has a lower top speed. Because of the power output.
Also are we talking road vehicles or land speed record?
I fix cars.
Bennoz wrote:I got Bali beli & sharted on my phone. But it was fun
bjk wrote:you old people are no help at all.
- ZFL45H1
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 1830
- Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 6:00 pm
- Location: Albury