Page 2 of 3

Re: Differences in gear boxes

Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 11:59 pm
by Taz
Same here shane, cusco had a stand at time attack last year with their LSD oil, with comparisons and motul and cusco were almost identical, with cusco being slighty better on wear rate apparently but if you can vouch for the motul then maybe thats the way to go, easier to source than cusco oil as well

Re: Differences in gear boxes

Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:00 am
by Technikhaus
this just got confusing... 8O

where would I look at getting some of this stuff then?
my local auto stores don't sell it...

Re: Differences in gear boxes

Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:04 am
by Taz
If you dont have an LSD like me n shane etc then you dont need as stringent oil as him - a good regular oil will suffice

Re: Differences in gear boxes

Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:06 am
by Shane001
You would probably find the Cusco oil is not made by Cusco, simply rebranded.

But again you would just want to make sure it is OK for hypoid gears.

But yeah Motul is a world recognised motorsport quality oil. I'd be running their engine oil also if it wasn't so f**king expensive lol!

Re: Differences in gear boxes

Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:09 am
by Taz
sorry for off topic here but what oil are you running - ive got castol syth 5-30 in at the moment - have you tried/rated it against others?

Re: Differences in gear boxes

Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:10 am
by PHIL069
Only showing 1 litre bottle.... EDIT: I think I will use this one
http://www.supercheapauto.co.nz/online- ... escription

710 May also use CASTROL VMX 80.
http://www.supercheapauto.co.nz/online- ... escription

Maybe wait to see what Bennoz says................

Re: Differences in gear boxes

Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:11 am
by Technikhaus
well I'm guessing I don't have an LSD...

so is there anything here that I could use then?

http://www.supercheapauto.co.nz/online- ... px?id=5202

edit: just saw your post Phil, thanks, will look into those ones :)

Re: Differences in gear boxes

Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:12 am
by Taz
only the GPR rolled off the floor with it stock, and if you dont know that you have one or not, chances are that you dont.

Re: Differences in gear boxes

Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:15 am
by PHIL069
Both front wheels off the ground, engine NOT going.....spin one wheel by hand while in gear........2 wheels spin same direction = LSD........two wheels spin opposite direction = non-LSD

Re: Differences in gear boxes

Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:18 am
by Shane001
Taz wrote:sorry for off topic here but what oil are you running - ive got castol syth 5-30 in at the moment - have you tried/rated it against others?
Yeah I've been using Castrol Edge 5W30 for a while now, seems as good as anything I've used (but i haven't used Motul lol).

Re: Differences in gear boxes

Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:29 am
by shadowarrior
Shane001 wrote: But yeah Motul is a world recognised motorsport quality oil. I'd be running their engine oil also if it wasn't so f**king expensive lol!
Love Motul engine oil on my bikes. Been sticking to them for some long years now. Will definitely use the Motul 300V 10w-40 or 5w-30 for the car. They are expensive yes, but imo definitely worth it.

Re: Differences in gear boxes

Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 8:14 am
by Bennoz
LOL @ yet another oil thread.

I just use what the manual says. My closest available Repco sells Valvoline Duragear, 75W - 85 API GL-4.

Image

I too have an LSD, but the instructions that came with my LSD were to just use the factory spec oil, as its a helical type & not a clutch type.

The only time you'd need to change from what the manual says is if you have a clutch type diff.

Re: Differences in gear boxes

Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 5:03 pm
by PHIL069
Borrowed 3 Litres of this from work today, now I can do an oil change too :cheers: Thank you work :twisted:

Re: Differences in gear boxes

Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 5:09 pm
by Bennoz
:cheers:

I hate how they come in 4 litre bottles thou :x Stupid 2.2 litre capacity gearboxes :x

:lol:

Re: Differences in gear boxes

Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 5:23 pm
by PHIL069
Bennoz wrote: :cheers:

I hate how they come in 4 litre bottles thou :x Stupid 2.2 litre capacity gearboxes :x

:lol:
2.2 litres for gearbox
0.3 litres to flush out some crap from gearbox
1.5 litres to spill on the driveway while trying to pour it into gearbox
----------
4.0 litres :cheers:

Re: Differences in gear boxes

Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 5:30 pm
by fraz91
Bennoz wrote::cheers:

I hate how they come in 4 litre bottles thou :x Stupid 2.2 litre capacity gearboxes :x

:lol:
1.9L for my front diff :cheers:

Haven't checked the gearbox level, probably up around the 5.5 mark... :(

Re: Differences in gear boxes

Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 7:17 pm
by phunkydude
i heard ATF works better as MT oil... , anyone tried that? :cheeky:

does MT has oil filter like AT?

Re: Differences in gear boxes

Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 7:38 pm
by silverGPX
Manual doesnt have a filter like AT andrew.

Re: Differences in gear boxes

Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 7:50 pm
by kiz
PHIL069 wrote:
Bennoz wrote: :cheers:

I hate how they come in 4 litre bottles thou :x Stupid 2.2 litre capacity gearboxes :x

:lol:
2.2 litres for gearbox
0.3 litres to flush out some crap from gearbox
1.5 litres to spill on the driveway while trying to pour it into gearbox
----------
4.0 litres :cheers:
Sounds like when Tim did my gearbox oil a few months ago.

"Oil keeps going in??? WTF, how much does that gearbox hold, It's still going, must be bigger than 2.2L, get's to 3L in box, can't be a standard GPVR gearbox?!?". Let's check, pull out funnel, all the backed up oil goes on the ground... About a litres worth by memory haha.

Not sure how it managed to overfill itself by that much though

Re: Differences in gear boxes

Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 9:03 pm
by PHIL069
phunkydude wrote:i heard ATF works better as MT oil... , anyone tried that? :cheeky:

does MT has oil filter like AT?
Some newer manual gearboxes use ATF as standard eg. Ford Ranger