Page 2 of 2
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:31 pm
by FtoSam
Lol... Read the whole thread guys...
was just joking around... this is not my FTO...
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 12:38 am
by Storm
FtoSam wrote:Lol... Read the whole thread guys...
was just joking around... this is not my FTO...
You bugger, I knew the gold one wasn't yours but I thought you had went ahead with getting the rear floorpan in for the AWD
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 12:48 am
by xSlurpee
Nice respray sam ... when did you get it done and how much did it cost
.... Keep us updated on your FTO. i want to know the potentials ... if good ill invest on an AWD FTO with a 4g63t (fk division 5 for powerball tonight ... 12bucks?
)
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 9:33 am
by Bennoz
Dont f**k around with a 4g63, 6A13 ftw!
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 10:26 am
by FtoSam
Any progress on yours ben?
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 11:00 am
by yano
Bennoz wrote:Dont f*** around with a 4g63, 6A13 ftw!
LOL, it's easy to gloat when you have the engine on your way... so jealous
. Don't discount the 4g63t, the motor can handle over 20psi and there are trade secrets concerning with timiing. Can achieve around 290kws atw no problem on this motor with stock internals and stock turbo!! Although 2.5l's, 6 cylinders and turbo is a recipe for massive power too.
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 2:23 pm
by xSlurpee
Soo ill name a few MITSUBISHI engines and you list them from 5 being worst power to 1 being most power
6A13tt
4G63 (no mivec)
4G63t (mivec + turbo omg)
6G72tt (no chance of fitting this one?)
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 2:45 pm
by FtoSam
With my limited knowledge:
1) 6A13tt - Been done before.. Plenty of power... good torque...
2) 4G63 (no mivec) - No mivec = nice and simple to tune plus cheaper
3) 4G63t (mivec + turbo omg) - Little bit more complex but still good for power
4) 6G72tt (no chance of fitting this one?) - No chance... plus sh*t for upgrading... and heavy as hell
Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2008 8:14 am
by Bennoz
Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 3:55 pm
by Nacho
FtoSam wrote:With my limited knowledge:
4) 6G72tt (no chance of fitting this one?) - No chance... plus sh*t for upgrading... and heavy as hell
He may have a chance getting this in if he cuts through his firewall.
Anyone had a serious look at the 4B11 yet?
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 5:32 pm
by koolio1234
a lot of respect for this mod sam......your a pioneer in the world of ftos
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 5:50 pm
by FtoSam
Nacho wrote:FtoSam wrote:With my limited knowledge:
4) 6G72tt (no chance of fitting this one?) - No chance... plus sh*t for upgrading... and heavy as hell
He may have a chance getting this in if he cuts through his firewall.
Anyone had a serious look at the 4B11 yet?
Evo box will not mate to the 6a12
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 5:56 pm
by FtoSam
Yeah been keeping an eye on that one...
Only problem is its a 4G63 conversion which is completely different to my conversion...
I posted up a thread on it a while ago...
It is hot as!
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 3:41 am
by HeRo
Hey so what's so special about the Frankenstein engine? As in, why not have an entire 6a13 rather than half? .__."
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 7:46 am
by da_msta_chizz
HeRo wrote:Hey so what's so special about the Frankenstein engine? As in, why not have an entire 6a13 rather than half? .__."
This way, he can still have all the bottom end power of the 6A13, while keeping the stupidly high revving mivec screamer style top end.
Bet that would be an awesome combination..
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 10:22 pm
by HeRo
ohhh,
mad...i just made the assumption that the 6a13 revs to 8500 fuel cut as well, i think i read somewhere ?
.__.
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 7:29 am
by Bennoz
The key to the 6A13 is the bottom end. All Mitsubishi factory turbo motors come with bullet proof bottom ends, including nitrided cranks and monster oil pumps.