Crap cut from Valandis build

Anything off topic that you want to share with the group. (warning this board may include coarse language)

Moderators: IMC, Club Staff

Post Reply
User avatar
Bennoz
National President
Posts: 23676
jedwabna poszewka promocja
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: My FTO is getting the works! Final Dyno Sheet, Page 26

Post by Bennoz »

I hate to say it Val, but after the 10 odd grand you've spent on this motor, including ported & polished heads, sure the torque is good, but to only get 116 odd kws.... I got a 126 out of GR motor for god sake.

I'd take those cams back to RPW & shove them square up their ass.

And to quote the bloke that tunes my car, when asked his opinion on emanage products "Emanage users are like Honda bois. Reckon they got the best on the market when in reality everytime I pull one out & replace with a Haltech, I double their power" :lol:
User avatar
Shane001
Oldtimer
Posts: 2730
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:00 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: My FTO is getting the works! Final Dyno Sheet, Page 26

Post by Shane001 »

Bennoz wrote: And to quote the bloke that tunes my car, when asked his opinion on emanage products "Emanage users are like Honda bois. Reckon they got the best on the market when in reality everytime I pull one out & replace with a Haltech, I double their power" :lol:
Sorry Ben, but to defend the emanage boys (and my tuner says the same of Haltech lol), the Haltech piggy backs do not directly tune the ignition or the injectors, they only trick the factory ecu into reading from a different point on the factory programmed map. This is very limiting in what you can do. The emanage ultimate allows you to tune the injectors and the timing directly. Any tuner that says this is not better doesn't know how to tune it...

That said I haven't got mine working yet, haven't had time, but will have by Bathurst next year at the latest, otherwise I'll be going full ecu...
User avatar
Shane001
Oldtimer
Posts: 2730
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:00 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: My FTO is getting the works! Final Dyno Sheet, Page 26

Post by Shane001 »

Bennoz wrote:I hate to say it Val, but after the 10 odd grand you've spent on this motor, including ported & polished heads, sure the torque is good, but to only get 116 odd kws
Gotta agree on this though, but this could just be a sh*t dyno reading. Looking at your torque graph & your power graph, it doesn't make sense that you are getting such a high torque figure & such a low power figure. These are simply calculations of each other. Actually they are both calculations of raw torque generated by the dyno. I'm suspecting that the power calculation may be wrong, or vice versa. Val you need to get the data in excel so you can do the math.

Or take it to the drag strip and post up the official time slip 8)

You definitely need more fuel from 150 to 180k's. Notice how the torque curve drops away as the afr leans out above 13, then jumps back up at 180 as the afr suddenly richens up.
User avatar
Valandis91
Veteran Mechanic
Posts: 1169
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Tasmania
Contact:

Re: My FTO is getting the works! Final Dyno Sheet, Page 26

Post by Valandis91 »

Bennoz wrote:I hate to say it Val, but after the 10 odd grand you've spent on this motor, including ported & polished heads, sure the torque is good, but to only get 116 odd kws.... I got a 126 out of GR motor for god sake.

I'd take those cams back to RPW & shove them square up their ass.

And to quote the bloke that tunes my car, when asked his opinion on emanage products "Emanage users are like Honda bois. Reckon they got the best on the market when in reality everytime I pull one out & replace with a Haltech, I double their power" :lol:
i just realised. these heads are off the hybrid motor. so the combustion chamber was ported to be able to meet a larger 81mm bore piston? wouldnt i lost compression due to this plus the age of my block?

i dont think i could afford to take them out :(

and wouldnt that just be your tuner specialises in haltech? ive heard so many different oppinions its not funny.
Shane001 wrote:
Bennoz wrote:I hate to say it Val, but after the 10 odd grand you've spent on this motor, including ported & polished heads, sure the torque is good, but to only get 116 odd kws
Gotta agree on this though, but this could just be a sh*t dyno reading. Looking at your torque graph & your power graph, it doesn't make sense that you are getting such a high torque figure & such a low power figure. These are simply calculations of each other. Actually they are both calculations of raw torque generated by the dyno. I'm suspecting that the power calculation may be wrong, or vice versa. Val you need to get the data in excel so you can do the math.

Or take it to the drag strip and post up the official time slip 8)

You definitely need more fuel from 150 to 180k's. Notice how the torque curve drops away as the afr leans out above 13, then jumps back up at 180 as the afr suddenly richens up.
ill go back to him during the week and ask for it. he said it could be due to low compression which would make sense? :s

i wouldnnt blame the dyno. they put a stock r34 gtr nur spec and it got exactly what it should along as another stock cars. its fairly new still. hes only been open a couple of months.

i shall go to the drags once i sus it out down here.

yeah ive richened that up now.
Image
User avatar
Valandis91
Veteran Mechanic
Posts: 1169
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Tasmania
Contact:

Re: My FTO is getting the works! Final Dyno Sheet, Page 26

Post by Valandis91 »

oh and i realised on friday night ive never actually done a compression test on my engine :oops:
Image
User avatar
Shane001
Oldtimer
Posts: 2730
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:00 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: My FTO is getting the works! Final Dyno Sheet, Page 26

Post by Shane001 »

Yeah do a compression test and let us know. Probably should have shaved a few thou before assembly ;)

The other thing to realise also is how much time did you schedule on the dyno? If only 1 or 2 hours than the result you've got is pretty good. You will probably need to take it back a few times before you get it perfect, analysing the data each time.

If u can get the data in excel email it to me when u get it.
User avatar
Shane001
Oldtimer
Posts: 2730
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:00 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: My FTO is getting the works! Final Dyno Sheet, Page 26

Post by Shane001 »

Valandis91 wrote: i just realised. these heads are off the hybrid motor. so the combustion chamber was ported to be able to meet a larger 81mm bore piston? wouldnt i lost compression due to this plus the age of my block?
Ask your engine builder what the final compression ratio was. Also confirm your bore and stroke, and the final capacity of the engine. This is all important info your builder should be able to tell you, if not you should be able to calculate it. Just more to learn ;)
User avatar
Astron_Boy
Trolling Gen Y
Posts: 8400
Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 5:00 pm
Location: Wine Country NSW
Contact:

Re: My FTO is getting the works! Final Dyno Sheet, Page 26

Post by Astron_Boy »

So long as you are happy in the end, that's the main thing.

But honestly, I've spent far less putting in a 1 cam turbo motor into my station wagon, with a yet to be tuned 150kws @ the tyres.
And the thing is 25yrs old with only an oil change...

Dunno dude, honestly seems like the thing has been a bit of a waste, but then it gets back to line 1...
Image
User avatar
Bennoz
National President
Posts: 23676
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: My FTO is getting the works! Final Dyno Sheet, Page 26

Post by Bennoz »

Shane001 wrote:
Bennoz wrote: And to quote the bloke that tunes my car, when asked his opinion on emanage products "Emanage users are like Honda bois. Reckon they got the best on the market when in reality everytime I pull one out & replace with a Haltech, I double their power" :lol:
Sorry Ben, but to defend the emanage boys (and my tuner says the same of Haltech lol), the Haltech piggy backs do not directly tune the ignition or the injectors, they only trick the factory ecu into reading from a different point on the factory programmed map. This is very limiting in what you can do. The emanage ultimate allows you to tune the injectors and the timing directly. Any tuner that says this is not better doesn't know how to tune it...
Thats because the Emanage directly wires to the injectors & ignitors.... so technically its not a piggy back, we're comparing apples to oranges.
Did you ever end up speaking to Brent @ Envy?
User avatar
I8A4RE
QLD Coordinator
Posts: 9594
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: BOOSTIN in front of you
Contact:

Re: My FTO is getting the works! Final Dyno Sheet, Page 26

Post by I8A4RE »

mate i wouldnt even be comparing 6a13 conversion to this. You would better off comparing it to mine and still mine was less money and more power.
CHRISTIANITY: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...
User avatar
SG
Veteran Mechanic
Posts: 833
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Perth

Re: My FTO is getting the works! Final Dyno Sheet, Page 26

Post by SG »

Yeah misread that bit.
User avatar
payaya
Oldtimer
Posts: 3670
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 5:00 pm

Re: My FTO is getting the works! Final Dyno Sheet, Page 26

Post by payaya »

Bennoz wrote:I hate to say it Val, but after the 10 odd grand you've spent on this motor, including ported & polished heads, sure the torque is good, but to only get 116 odd kws.... I got a 126 out of GR motor for god sake.

I'd take those cams back to RPW & shove them square up their ass.

And to quote the bloke that tunes my car, when asked his opinion on emanage products "Emanage users are like Honda bois. Reckon they got the best on the market when in reality everytime I pull one out & replace with a Haltech, I double their power" :lol:
10k??? Damn did not know it was that much!!!
User avatar
payaya
Oldtimer
Posts: 3670
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 5:00 pm

Re: My FTO is getting the works! Dyno sheet on page 19.

Post by payaya »

Delvance wrote:No way the 2L is putting out 350nm+. We're talking forced induction territory. N/a's generally won't achieve much over 100nm of torque per litre of displacement. You can simply have a look at the highest strung n/a motors to see this. Check out ferrari's and bmw m series engine or lamborghinis. They are not much over 100nm per 1L of capacity and these engines are engineered to the finest/highest output potential. 350nm+ in an fto would be a tire fryer and you can see this from the turbo'd fto's.

Dyno's don't really read your torque figure like that. Kw they read ok.

And for the vq35 torqueband in the 350z, it is pretty fat (not short). i had the 1st gen vq35de in my old v35 and it had oodles of torque off idle and it went pretty high in the rev range.
Yeah no way its 350NM+ That's really hard to get out of 2L NA even for a race motor and mega bucks it will be too hard.
User avatar
I8A4RE
QLD Coordinator
Posts: 9594
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: BOOSTIN in front of you
Contact:

Re: My FTO is getting the works! Final Dyno Sheet, Page 26

Post by I8A4RE »

Bennoz wrote:I hate to say it Val, but after the 10 odd grand you've spent on this motor, including ported & polished heads, sure the torque is good, but to only get 116 odd kws.... I got a 126 out of GR motor for god sake.

I'd take those cams back to RPW & shove them square up their ass.

And to quote the bloke that tunes my car, when asked his opinion on emanage products "Emanage users are like Honda bois. Reckon they got the best on the market when in reality everytime I pull one out & replace with a Haltech, I double their power" :lol:
Hold on, hold on. We are not comparing apples with apples here. Bennoz yours would have been manual, correct? About 10kw difference is about right for a manual compared to an auto around those kw's.
CHRISTIANITY: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...
User avatar
SmokeSolid
Grease Monkey
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: My FTO is getting the works! Final Dyno Sheet, Page 26

Post by SmokeSolid »

I respect the fanatic, impulsive and compulsive spending behavior you have. Its clear you love your FTO more than a lot of owners. Thing is most guys have a colder heads while spending money and they get a turbo engine, or they get decomp gaskets and turbo there 6a12 and use it with a moderate boost to gain what you tried to gain N/A.

If I cared about power that much I would of have gotten a Turbo engine maybe a 6a13tt with everything and f**k everybody with a 380 hp at the wheel monster and its possible. In my case Ill rather turn fast in an autocross competiton or time attack than to win in drag racing.

I read the complete 500+ posts and thank god I trusted my instincts and didn't bought RPW camshafts.

But recently my inner voice was telling me: buy the cams...buy the cams lol.

I didn't read about you getting an LSD? Your gearbox already have the stock one? If not why you don't get one?

Im really sorry for all the amazing trouble you are/where in. If I where you I will enjoy my car for a while and forget about "secret" projects.

You have balls for doing all those mods congrats.

Regards,

P.D: Why carbon,white and grey you still have to finish of the front bumper?
Why you keep the GPX decal if you have a version r spoiler :P jut curios dont want to bother you asking this but since Ive read 500+ posts I already concerned and curios about you project.
User avatar
SG
Veteran Mechanic
Posts: 833
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Perth

Re: My FTO is getting the works! Final Dyno Sheet, Page 26

Post by SG »

I think you're concerned and curous because a lot of ppl here like to complain about things!

You can compare any two things successfully before you add context.

Not everyone wants max power as we wouldnt have bought an fto in the first place if we did. I think he's done the right thing with trying to improve the way the car sounds and you also get the benefit of a smooth torque curve being N/a. Theres plenty of things to compare, and no one said it cost 10k bennoz said it cost 10-odd k and its a guess, and who cares as its done and its not your cash and he's happy.

If you want to f**k everybody why are you driving an fto?

On the defense of RPW camshafts, they cost so much because they use blank camshafts (new ones) and dont regrind. And afaik it was something about getting more tuneability out of them.

I think you could save a lot of cash on doing an N/a build if you use magna 3.0/3.5l components second hand such as tb and injectors but the manifold still would be an issue... and all the otehr expensive components would add up btu thats the cost of modifying and if you get what you want its all good imo.
User avatar
SmokeSolid
Grease Monkey
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: My FTO is getting the works! Final Dyno Sheet, Page 26

Post by SmokeSolid »

Dear SG,

Why are you so jumpy? Why I sense you are offended or bothered by something I said or your just bitching because other forum member have been complaining about things.

I really think you dont know how to write or read properly my friend.

I said I dont care about power...if i did ill set up a twinturbo engine I have the budget for it but I dont really dont care thattt muchhhh about how much HP i get. I am more interested in trackday,autocross and time attack events.

I am not trashing RPW ive bought a lot of things from them I have some complaints on the head Gaskets they send me(I had to use ferridays gaskets that are much better) and the extractors didnt fit 100% properly but in the other hand the LSD and the flywheel fitted like a glove.

So calm down mate. I wasnt even talking to you.

Best regards,
User avatar
Valandis91
Veteran Mechanic
Posts: 1169
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Tasmania
Contact:

Re: My FTO is getting the works! Dyno sheet on page 19.

Post by Valandis91 »

payaya wrote:
Delvance wrote:No way the 2L is putting out 350nm+. We're talking forced induction territory. N/a's generally won't achieve much over 100nm of torque per litre of displacement. You can simply have a look at the highest strung n/a motors to see this. Check out ferrari's and bmw m series engine or lamborghinis. They are not much over 100nm per 1L of capacity and these engines are engineered to the finest/highest output potential. 350nm+ in an fto would be a tire fryer and you can see this from the turbo'd fto's.

Dyno's don't really read your torque figure like that. Kw they read ok.

And for the vq35 torqueband in the 350z, it is pretty fat (not short). i had the 1st gen vq35de in my old v35 and it had oodles of torque off idle and it went pretty high in the rev range.
Yeah no way its 350NM+ That's really hard to get out of 2L NA even for a race motor and mega bucks it will be too hard.
its a maths equation. you need torque figures to get kw and you need kw figures to work out the torque as shane001 explained previously in this thread.

if either is incorrect then they will provide WRONG results for both figures. one cant be wrong and one be right.

so in other words your claiming this entire dyno is wrong.

its near new. ive seen stock r34's, subaru wrx's pull exactly what theyre meant to from factory. you guys just arent willing to believe it.

and fair enough. but seriously chill out.
I8A4RE wrote:
Bennoz wrote:I hate to say it Val, but after the 10 odd grand you've spent on this motor, including ported & polished heads, sure the torque is good, but to only get 116 odd kws.... I got a 126 out of GR motor for god sake.

I'd take those cams back to RPW & shove them square up their ass.

And to quote the bloke that tunes my car, when asked his opinion on emanage products "Emanage users are like Honda bois. Reckon they got the best on the market when in reality everytime I pull one out & replace with a Haltech, I double their power" :lol:
Hold on, hold on. We are not comparing apples with apples here. Bennoz yours would have been manual, correct? About 10kw difference is about right for a manual compared to an auto around those kw's.
dave from RPW and my tuner say that it might even get another 20 odd kw with a manual as this box sucks the torque out.
SmokeSolid wrote:I respect the fanatic, impulsive and compulsive spending behavior you have. Its clear you love your FTO more than a lot of owners. Thing is most guys have a colder heads while spending money and they get a turbo engine, or they get decomp gaskets and turbo there 6a12 and use it with a moderate boost to gain what you tried to gain N/A.

If I cared about power that much I would of have gotten a Turbo engine maybe a 6a13tt with everything and f**k everybody with a 380 hp at the wheel monster and its possible. In my case Ill rather turn fast in an autocross competiton or time attack than to win in drag racing.

I read the complete 500+ posts and thank god I trusted my instincts and didn't bought RPW camshafts.

But recently my inner voice was telling me: buy the cams...buy the cams lol.

I didn't read about you getting an LSD? Your gearbox already have the stock one? If not why you don't get one?

Im really sorry for all the amazing trouble you are/where in. If I where you I will enjoy my car for a while and forget about "secret" projects.

You have balls for doing all those mods congrats.

Regards,

P.D: Why carbon,white and grey you still have to finish of the front bumper?
Why you keep the GPX decal if you have a version r spoiler :P jut curios dont want to bother you asking this but since Ive read 500+ posts I already concerned and curios about you project.
haha thanks mate ive been watching your thread very closely as im keen to see what youll get from all the work youve done.
i could never go forced induction its too easy :p

im the same with you if i wanted outrageous power i wouldve gotten the 6a13 but im different ;) its all about the handling!

untill i figure out that this iss the most these cams can achieve i wont say whether its worth it or not. i have run into a lot of problems and i still believe theyre not sset right so the vernier cam gears will have to go on.

at the moment i dont have the coin to buy the lsd. plus mucking around with splines on driveshafts.

i am enjoying it a lot! just cant accelerate much outta corners otherwise i go straight from the torque :P the secret project will take me a few years to gather all the parts i need plus to have a bit spare cash to have to spend.

cheers im happy but i know there is more to unleash from this set up.

oh and yeah i need to paint my front bar haha still havent gotten aroundf to it. not necessary at the moment. saving for other things.
Image
User avatar
SmokeSolid
Grease Monkey
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: My FTO is getting the works! Final Dyno Sheet, Page 26

Post by SmokeSolid »

Hi V,

I hope one day you tune your car perfectly and squeeze all the power out of it.

I will stay tuned.

Best wishes,
S
User avatar
payaya
Oldtimer
Posts: 3670
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 5:00 pm

Re: My FTO is getting the works! Final Dyno Sheet, Page 26

Post by payaya »

No offence but a near new engine should not be producing 80RWKW period. Also you mention if you wanted power you would have went a 6a13. But throughly this thread the general impression I get is, you focused on power.
Post Reply