Dodgy fuel - Caltex M4
Moderators: IMC, Club Staff
- Bennoz
- National President
- Posts: 23676
- jedwabna poszewka promocja
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:00 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Dodgy fuel - Caltex M4
Stop using 91. In any car. It makes baby Jebus cry.
The tightwad of cash you've just saved = less efficient burn = less kms per tank = saving gone.
The tightwad of cash you've just saved = less efficient burn = less kms per tank = saving gone.
- bjk
- Totes
- Posts: 5756
- Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 1:34 pm
- Location: Adelaide
Re: Dodgy fuel - Caltex M4
I was under the impression that most passenger cars designed to run on standard fuel wouldn't particularly benefit from premium, due to the ECU not really being able to account for the difference or somesuch?Bennoz wrote:Stop using 91. In any car. It makes baby Jebus cry.
The tightwad of cash you've just saved = less efficient burn = less kms per tank = saving gone.
- dstocks
- National Vice President
- Posts: 9529
- Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 5:00 pm
- Location: Utopia
- Contact:
Re: Dodgy fuel - Caltex M4
Cars are generally detuned to cope with lower ron fuels, not necessarily designed for them. The higher RON fuels will still burn better and generally be better for your engine. Besides, what makes you think that most standard passenger cars have been designed to run on 91. If it was made in Australia, possibly, but more likely they are just a detuned overseas spec. If the car is made anywhere else then the standard octane level will quite possibly be different anyway. In Japan, their octane level is generally higher than ours, particularly in the cities. In the regions is is poor quality, but not necessarily that much lower.
Complete FTO (http://www.completefto.com.au/completefto.asp) 
If you are trying to contact me and not getting a quick answer, its because im disorganised. Hassle me and ill get back to you

If you are trying to contact me and not getting a quick answer, its because im disorganised. Hassle me and ill get back to you
- SchumieFan
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 5875
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 5:00 pm
- Location: GPS signal lost
- Contact:
Re: Dodgy fuel - Caltex M4
Quite the opposite bj... ecu's are computers mate! They calculate and adjust a/f ratios to suit...
Something with a carby would blindly add fuel - with added benefit of hp depending on the fuel sure... but there is no such thing as 'standard' fuel... hence the need for an ecu in the first place
Something with a carby would blindly add fuel - with added benefit of hp depending on the fuel sure... but there is no such thing as 'standard' fuel... hence the need for an ecu in the first place

- bjk
- Totes
- Posts: 5756
- Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 1:34 pm
- Location: Adelaide
- Daniel2019
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 7957
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:25 pm
- Location: Sydney!
- Contact:
Re: Dodgy fuel - Caltex M4
Nup. E10 makes even newer Mazda's upset.
95 or more please.
As Ben said you get a cleaner burn and more fuel economy from higher rated fuels.
95 or more please.
As Ben said you get a cleaner burn and more fuel economy from higher rated fuels.
I fix cars.
Bennoz wrote:I got Bali beli & sharted on my phone. But it was fun
bjk wrote:you old people are no help at all.
- spetz
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 2915
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 6:00 pm
Re: Dodgy fuel - Caltex M4
Most cars have knock sensors too, so the ECU is then able to adjust the timing with 98RON and hence achieve more power.
Some cars don't have knock sensors though and as such the timing is set to cope with 91RON fuel
Some cars don't have knock sensors though and as such the timing is set to cope with 91RON fuel
- Daniel2019
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 7957
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:25 pm
- Location: Sydney!
- Contact:
Re: Dodgy fuel - Caltex M4
You get all sorts of weird stuff from lower rated fuels.. Remember octane rating is the fuel's ability to avoid self ignition/ignition due to compression. The higher the rating, the more likely the fuel is to ignite at the ideal time.. which gives cleaner burn, happier engine.. etc..
Just put 98 in everything ffs.
Just put 98 in everything ffs.
I fix cars.
Bennoz wrote:I got Bali beli & sharted on my phone. But it was fun
bjk wrote:you old people are no help at all.
- SchumieFan
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 5875
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 5:00 pm
- Location: GPS signal lost
- Contact:
Re: Dodgy fuel - Caltex M4
Looked at the ratings today as i filled up... "91 - regular octane... for some petrol engines* *check your manufacturer manual
95- for most petrol engines
98- premium - for all petrol engines"
95- for most petrol engines
98- premium - for all petrol engines"

- PHIL069
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 4719
- Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:00 pm
- Location: Central Coast > South Australia
Re: Dodgy fuel - Caltex M4
FTO - Vortex 98
Galant - Vortex 98
Laser - Caltex 91 - with no ethanol - because race car
Galant - Vortex 98
Laser - Caltex 91 - with no ethanol - because race car

mikeey01nzl wrote:Hats off to you too Phil for spending so much time on the phone trying to help someone out, your a top man and only a few would've spent so much time. well done!![]()
Daniel2019 wrote:Come on phil, we bonded at the bonfire, lets be honest here...me and phil are besties now...![]()
- Strkszone
- Grease Monkey
- Posts: 346
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2014 5:19 pm
- Location: Wollongong, NSW
Re: Dodgy fuel - Caltex M4
Most Japanese motor vehicles are tuned to run on 91 octane just fine. 95 is usually standard for European manufactured cars and 98 can of course be run in all petrol engine cars. 98 is more expensive in the long run, but it's better for your engine and increases performance. The cost difference I believe only amounted to something like $40 / 20,000km (or 1 year). A test for fuel efficiency was done by carsguide.
Using a Holden Captiva 7 CX they measured
11.9L / 100km (E10) vs 11.1L / 100km (91) vs 10.2L / 100km (98)
Meaning that:
$1.454 / L = $17.30
$1.474 / L = $16.36
$1.634 / L = $16.67
It is more optimal to run 91 in terms of short term fuel cost if... the price difference between E10 is less than 8 cents cheaper than 91.. and in addition 91 needs to be 13 cents cheaper than 98 in order to remain optimal. So if 98 is 13 cents more expensive than 91.. it is cheaper to just buy 98... and in general it's better to buy 98 anyway due to the fact 98 is simply a higher grade of petrol. It's better for your engine and the overall cost per year that you're spending is more than worth it.
http://www.carsguide.com.au/car-reviews ... Zxf7Pmqqkp
Using a Holden Captiva 7 CX they measured
11.9L / 100km (E10) vs 11.1L / 100km (91) vs 10.2L / 100km (98)
Meaning that:
$1.454 / L = $17.30
$1.474 / L = $16.36
$1.634 / L = $16.67
It is more optimal to run 91 in terms of short term fuel cost if... the price difference between E10 is less than 8 cents cheaper than 91.. and in addition 91 needs to be 13 cents cheaper than 98 in order to remain optimal. So if 98 is 13 cents more expensive than 91.. it is cheaper to just buy 98... and in general it's better to buy 98 anyway due to the fact 98 is simply a higher grade of petrol. It's better for your engine and the overall cost per year that you're spending is more than worth it.
http://www.carsguide.com.au/car-reviews ... Zxf7Pmqqkp
- SchumieFan
- Oldtimer
- Posts: 5875
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 5:00 pm
- Location: GPS signal lost
- Contact:
- bjk
- Totes
- Posts: 5756
- Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 1:34 pm
- Location: Adelaide
- Bennoz
- National President
- Posts: 23676
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:00 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Dodgy fuel - Caltex M4
Japan doesn't have 91 RON. 95 is their lowest, much like the rest of the world.Strkszone wrote:Most Japanese motor vehicles are tuned to run on 91 octane just fine
- Strkszone
- Grease Monkey
- Posts: 346
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2014 5:19 pm
- Location: Wollongong, NSW
Re: Dodgy fuel - Caltex M4
But... it's on the internet...Bennoz wrote:Japan doesn't have 91 RON. 95 is their lowest, much like the rest of the world.Strkszone wrote:Most Japanese motor vehicles are tuned to run on 91 octane just fine

http://www.mynrma.com.au/motoring-servi ... e-fuel.htm
I always assumed only certain Japanese cars were designed to accept premium as a greater benefit as opposed to... Honda Civics/Accords/Jazz... Toyota Echo/Camry/Corolla/Yaris etc etc..? Then the upper spec ones.. Supra, S2000, NSX, Rotary Line, Evo, WRX... would benefit from premium grade petrol?
Edit: Also, just because they don't use it in Japan surely doesn't mean that the factory doesn't take that into account..?
- Bennoz
- National President
- Posts: 23676
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:00 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Dodgy fuel - Caltex M4
The bulk of Jap cars that are imported for sale in Aus are re-tuned. Primarily to meet Australia's emissions standards.
- Strkszone
- Grease Monkey
- Posts: 346
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2014 5:19 pm
- Location: Wollongong, NSW
Re: Dodgy fuel - Caltex M4
Makes sense, thanks Ben.