My New Bhp/ftlb Result =D, i reached that special mark

tintin · Post by **tintin** » Thu Dec 25, 2008 5:53 am

Got the car back to day with a better fuel pump bit of welding and another map

203.5bhp
162 ftlb which my tunner said for my engine thats very imprsive

oodLes · Post by **oodLes** » Thu Dec 25, 2008 6:07 pm

Well done dude, bet in that shell it would pull hard.

tintin · Post by **tintin** » Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:26 pm

oodLes wrote:Well done dude, bet in that shell it would pull hard.

withthe light fly wheel and the cyborg gear box as lsd to stop the wheels spining it dose pull hard

the car could do more bit its on a fine line that some thing could go pop so forged internals soon

i orderd my evo 6 ally rad yesterday as well to help cool it

xSlurpee · Post by **xSlurpee** » Fri Dec 26, 2008 12:44 am

mate thats awesome ... thats probably quicker than my ftslow

tintin · Post by **tintin** » Fri Dec 26, 2008 6:08 am

xSlurpee wrote:mate thats awesome ... thats probably quicker than my ftslow

im hoping to get 13s on the 1/4 mile

RallyMad · Post by **RallyMad** » Fri Dec 26, 2008 6:21 pm

good work mate. Have you got extractos?

I can just remember a longggg time ago the people mucking around with extractors found they could level out that dip in power and torque when mivec kicks in.

tintin · Post by **tintin** » Sat Dec 27, 2008 1:39 am

RallyMad wrote:good work mate. Have you got extractos?

I can just remember a longggg time ago the people mucking around with extractors found they could level out that dip in power and torque when mivec kicks in.

ive got the rpw racing down pipes and flexi pipe but im looking at a better flowing flexi pipe

RallyMad · Post by **RallyMad** » Sat Dec 27, 2008 2:38 am

ah ok cool. Maybe that much of a dip is just normal then. It's not like you can feel it anyway, right?

Everyone else seems to run RPW extractors and not just down pipes, though I can remember when the UAS down pipes were made it was found that the decrease in the dip there was one of the major benefits and talking points. Though they look pretty similar to those RPW down pipes so I'm guessing it is just normal.

tintin · Post by **tintin** » Sat Dec 27, 2008 3:00 am

RallyMad wrote:ah ok cool. Maybe that much of a dip is just normal then. It's not like you can feel it anyway, right?

Everyone else seems to run RPW extractors and not just down pipes, though I can remember when the UAS down pipes were made it was found that the decrease in the dip there was one of the major benefits and talking points. Though they look pretty similar to those RPW down pipes so I'm guessing it is just normal.

nope i cant feel the dip at all the person that mapped the car has done such a good job i cant feel the mivec kick in some times

the power just keeps coming

and with the cyborg box and fidanza ally fly wheel it picks up very quick

KingJames · Post by **KingJames** » Sat Dec 27, 2008 10:25 am

Excuse my ignorance but what car is it?

rock_it · Post by **rock_it** » Sat Dec 27, 2008 10:55 am

KingJames wrote:Excuse my ignorance but what car is it?

CE Lancer with FTO engine ... The red one that is in his signature...

RallyMad · Post by **RallyMad** » Sat Dec 27, 2008 1:55 pm

rock_it wrote:
KingJames wrote:Excuse my ignorance but what car is it?
CE Lancer with FTO engine ... The red one that is in his signature...

Isn't it a Mirage?!

tintin · Post by **tintin** » Sun Dec 28, 2008 12:07 am

RallyMad wrote:
rock_it wrote:
KingJames wrote:Excuse my ignorance but what car is it?
CE Lancer with FTO engine ... The red one that is in his signature...
Isn't it a Mirage?!

over hear its know as a colt but mine is a mirage but thats the spec model as it has the body kit with it

but it is a ce lancer over your way

RallyMad · Post by **RallyMad** » Sun Dec 28, 2008 12:53 am

so it is a 3 door sedan? I always thought it was a hatch, sorry tintin

tintin · Post by **tintin** » Sun Dec 28, 2008 2:06 am

RallyMad wrote:so it is a 3 door sedan? I always thought it was a hatch, sorry tintin

it is a hatch

over hear its a 1.6 glxi colt mirage cos its the mirage body kit i got on it that was standerd on my spec of car

over your way its called a ce lancer , i dont no why they dont just have one name for it around the world

RallyMad · Post by **RallyMad** » Sun Dec 28, 2008 3:09 am

Nope, over our way that is still called a Mirage. Only the new body shapes have gone back to a colt name for us.

Over here if it's a hatch it's a mirage. Doesn't become a lancer unless it's a sedan. Can understand the confusion though and agree with you, should be the same everywhere. I know in Japan that 3 door sedans used to be called mirages as well. Had to be a 4 door sedan until it was called a lancer over there.

loved the pics by the way

koolio1234 · Post by **koolio1234** » Sun Dec 28, 2008 3:29 am

Looking good mate, with that power to weight ratio your gonna be pulling 13s in no time.

tintin · Post by **tintin** » Sun Dec 28, 2008 3:34 am

RallyMad wrote:Nope, over our way that is still called a Mirage. Only the new body shapes have gone back to a colt name for us.

Over here if it's a hatch it's a mirage. Doesn't become a lancer unless it's a sedan. Can understand the confusion though and agree with you, should be the same everywhere. I know in Japan that 3 door sedans used to be called mirages as well. Had to be a 4 door sedan until it was called a lancer over there.

loved the pics by the way

cheers

tintin · Post by **tintin** » Sun Dec 28, 2008 3:35 am

koolio1234 wrote:Looking good mate, with that power to weight ratio your gonna be pulling 13s in no time.

i hope so

im only 80kg lighter then than a fto il have to weigh my car and see what it dose weigh

pete_gpx · Post by **pete_gpx** » Mon Dec 29, 2008 1:41 pm

Just curious, is the green line/read-out on the dyno graph power ATW?