ex-Supra Owner looking at FTO

New to FTO's? Or Just new to this forum? Come introduce yourself, we dont bite.

Moderators: IMC, Club Staff

Post Reply
User avatar
ftoindo
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 3
jedwabna poszewka promocja
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 5:00 pm

ex-Supra Owner looking at FTO

Post by ftoindo »

I had an N/A supra mk4 a couple years ago and crashed it beyond recognition. My Mrs has always been keen to get an FTO, I've driven it once didn't really think much of it.

I think I'm asking the question in the wrong place but... really how would you compare the 2. I'm keen to learn more about FTO's but still leaning towards getting another Supra MKiv (twin-turbo if I can save enough money otherwise another NA).

My Mrs doesn't like the supra never did. So I might comprimise with her. I don't mind the looks from the front (kinda like a supra - but the rear of the car *personally hate it - mainly the lights)

Are all FTO's naturally aspirated ? How would it go compared to the NA supra ?

I know it's fairly noobie kinda question and I should do more homework -- maybe someone is kind enough to give me some feedback.

Regards
User avatar
Supplanter
Forum Moderator
Posts: 6420
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Arizona Bay
Contact:

Post by Supplanter »

0-100kmh in around 7~7.5 seconds, 15ish sec quarter mile, and it handles better than a Supra (comparing stock with stock of course).

Can you bare going from RWD to FWD?

All FTOs are NA from factory, but there are a few turbo ones around, the 2.5L V6 twin turbo engine from the Vr4 Galant/Legnum is becoming a popular swap.
LED ALL the things.
User avatar
ftoindo
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 5:00 pm

Post by ftoindo »

I came from driving a Honda civic FWD to a Supra so I think it should be fine.
At least I would do less stupid things in a FWD. I killed my supra by doing a drift -- it was my last drift.

So... Are there differences in grades of FTO's what is the best ? I've seen GPX's and GP's what are the difference ?

The Supra NA was cranking 168kw's stock -- what does the FTO's pull out stock ?

Parts would same prices-ish i'm assuming and same with servicing the vehicle ?

BTW, thanks for responding.
User avatar
Therapy02
Apprentice
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 5:00 pm

Post by Therapy02 »

User avatar
J
Oldtimer
Posts: 2182
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Sydney West
Contact:

Post by J »

2JZ-GTE! the supra's will be more of a better choice IMO. bigger potential output and easier to get parts because they are more popular than the fto's... and theres the bigger "street reputation" haha
User avatar
dstocks
National Vice President
Posts: 9529
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 5:00 pm
Location: Utopia
Contact:

Post by dstocks »

Actually, as far as parts go, I can get any genuine new part landed within about 2 weeks, so parts arent really a problem (plenty of wreckers out there in a pinch as well).

The back of the FTO grows on you. I hated it to begin with. Now, Id like to improve it a little, but dont dislike it anymore.

If you are going to grab one, get a version R (GP). They have an LSD standard as well as front and rear strut braces. By the sounds of it, you would appreciate these features a lot more than climate control, which is what you get if you go for a GPX.
Complete FTO (http://www.completefto.com.au/completefto.asp)
    Image
    If you are trying to contact me and not getting a quick answer, its because im disorganised. Hassle me and ill get back to you
    User avatar
    Shahrez
    Mechanic
    Posts: 433
    Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 5:00 pm
    Location: Perth, WA
    Contact:

    Post by Shahrez »

    dstocks wrote:Actually, as far as parts go, I can get any genuine new part landed within about 2 weeks, so parts arent really a problem (plenty of wreckers out there in a pinch as well).

    The back of the FTO grows on you. I hated it to begin with. Now, Id like to improve it a little, but dont dislike it anymore.

    If you are going to grab one, get a version R (GP). They have an LSD standard as well as front and rear strut braces. By the sounds of it, you would appreciate these features a lot more than climate control, which is what you get if you go for a GPX.
    hahaahahahahahahahahahahh good one! even though i got a GPX! :lol:
    User avatar
    Tippin
    Oldtimer
    Posts: 1663
    Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 6:00 pm
    Location: Sydney

    Post by Tippin »

    hehe, save for the supra tt straight out!

    absolute f***in animals...

    im already saving for one for when i get my full license but u would be really surprised of how good the FTO really is, i think it will go nearly as hard and as said above better handling than your NA supra, and probably better on petrol i bet. I think the shape of the FTO looks stunning and always turns heads when cruising around but i could say the same thing for supras. The 6A12 engine is also quite reliable especially if taken care of and serviced regularly.

    The only thing im not too keen about with the supra is the interior, especially the centre console area and how its slanted towards the driver, the FTO interior definately dominates in that area

    anyway good luck, and you will not be dissapointed if u go for the FTO
    User avatar
    ftoindo
    Newbie
    Newbie
    Posts: 3
    Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 5:00 pm

    Post by ftoindo »

    Thanks for all your feedback and responses.

    I might test drive another FTO again and come to a conclusion. The thing that had me most about the supra was the center console -- It felt like your driving a Plane like in a cockpit or something.... i thought it was kinda cool. It kept you passenger off touching your dials... hahaha...

    The FTO's are better priced it seems. The GP(R) seem unfindable, the GPX seems to be plenty-ful as well as the GP's.

    I'm itching to get another sports car ... if I can save up the money it will be the TT Supra otherwise I might settle for the FTO -- better on petrol as well.

    How many Km's would you guys get on 1 tank on premium unleaded (I'm guessing that is what should be put into it).
    User avatar
    xSlurpee
    Oldtimer
    Posts: 1274
    Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 5:00 pm
    Location: Sydney 2163

    Post by xSlurpee »

    Hi there ... listen to your wife and get an FTO :D

    i filled about 50 litres one time and got 400km out of it ... and i redline every gear :lol:
    User avatar
    harry90
    Oldtimer
    Posts: 1768
    Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 5:00 pm
    Location: sydney

    Post by harry90 »

    i get around 300km's from $50 worth of fuel (around 30 litres)
    [url=http://imageshack.us][img]http://img413.imageshack.us/img413/1071/avatarxj1.jpg[/img][/url]
    User avatar
    Ezza
    Apprentice
    Posts: 58
    Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 5:00 pm
    Location: Adelaide, SA

    Post by Ezza »

    Jut a thought but I wonder if, because the FTO engines are designed to be driven high-revs, they give better fuel economy if you drive them in this manner than being driven gently?
    User avatar
    dstocks
    National Vice President
    Posts: 9529
    Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 5:00 pm
    Location: Utopia
    Contact:

    Post by dstocks »

    Ummmm no,

    Same as everything im afraid. The more lead in your foot, the more lead youll need in your wallet/purse.

    Having said that, I dont tend to find that the fueld usage is markedly different between granny driving and spirited driving.

    Oh and the GP is the version R
    Complete FTO (http://www.completefto.com.au/completefto.asp)
      Image
      If you are trying to contact me and not getting a quick answer, its because im disorganised. Hassle me and ill get back to you
      User avatar
      wjeffsy
      Apprentice
      Posts: 22
      Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 5:00 pm
      Location: Sydney, 2141

      Post by wjeffsy »

      ftoindo wrote:Thanks for all your feedback and responses.

      I might test drive another FTO again and come to a conclusion. The thing that had me most about the supra was the center console -- It felt like your driving a Plane like in a cockpit or something.... i thought it was kinda cool. It kept you passenger off touching your dials... hahaha...

      The FTO's are better priced it seems. The GP(R) seem unfindable, the GPX seems to be plenty-ful as well as the GP's.

      I'm itching to get another sports car ... if I can save up the money it will be the TT Supra otherwise I might settle for the FTO -- better on petrol as well.

      How many Km's would you guys get on 1 tank on premium unleaded (I'm guessing that is what should be put into it).
      There's a white GP version R Aero (rarer than a regular version R) on ebay right now selling for $12,990. The dealer mistakenly identified it as GPX. See the link below it is in Liverpool NSW:

      http://cgi.ebay.com.au/1998-Mitsubishi- ... dZViewItem
      User avatar
      Ezza
      Apprentice
      Posts: 58
      Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 5:00 pm
      Location: Adelaide, SA

      Post by Ezza »

      wjeffsy wrote:
      ftoindo wrote:Thanks for all your feedback and responses.

      I might test drive another FTO again and come to a conclusion. The thing that had me most about the supra was the center console -- It felt like your driving a Plane like in a cockpit or something.... i thought it was kinda cool. It kept you passenger off touching your dials... hahaha...

      The FTO's are better priced it seems. The GP(R) seem unfindable, the GPX seems to be plenty-ful as well as the GP's.

      I'm itching to get another sports car ... if I can save up the money it will be the TT Supra otherwise I might settle for the FTO -- better on petrol as well.

      How many Km's would you guys get on 1 tank on premium unleaded (I'm guessing that is what should be put into it).
      There's a white GP version R Aero (rarer than a regular version R) on ebay right now selling for $12,990. The dealer mistakenly identified it as GPX. See the link below it is in Liverpool NSW:

      http://cgi.ebay.com.au/1998-Mitsubishi- ... dZViewItem
      Nice...pity it's slightly out of my price range... :(
      User avatar
      dstocks
      National Vice President
      Posts: 9529
      Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 5:00 pm
      Location: Utopia
      Contact:

      Post by dstocks »

      Thats the ticket. Thats what ive got. Its a fully loaded version R. If its in good condition, its the best thing you could grab IMO. They are also the most expensive to pick up. At auction in Japan these go for 4K more than a stock version R (although they arent worth that much more based on what you get). Still im only aware of a few in the country.

      Hang on, thats a tiptronic, not a manual. Pity.....
      Last edited by dstocks on Fri Sep 26, 2008 3:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
      Complete FTO (http://www.completefto.com.au/completefto.asp)
        Image
        If you are trying to contact me and not getting a quick answer, its because im disorganised. Hassle me and ill get back to you
        User avatar
        Ezza
        Apprentice
        Posts: 58
        Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 5:00 pm
        Location: Adelaide, SA

        Post by Ezza »

        dstocks wrote:Thats the ticket. Thats what ive got. Its a fully loaded version R. If its in good condition, its the best thing you could grab IMO. They are also the most expensive to pick up. At auction in Japan these go for 4K more than a stock version R (although they arent worth that much more based on what you get). Still im only aware of a few in the country.
        Yeah seems like a bargain at that price, but if you can only afford what you can afford... :cry:
        Post Reply