FTO GPX VS INTEGRA VTIR

General Questions and comments

Moderators: IMC, Club Staff

ruchi
Oldtimer
Posts: 1845
jedwabna poszewka promocja
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by ruchi »

When the FTO first came out in the mid-'90s the car critics loved it, and one of the most noticeable features was its suspension and handling. At the time it apparently left all its competitors for dead.

So if you are comparing it to mid-'90s hondas, then the FTO's suspension should be better, but if comparing to newer Integra's, then with technology changes and upgrades, the Integra will probably win, but not by much :wink:
Last edited by ruchi on Mon Feb 16, 2004 9:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
MIVEC is My Friend :D
jester
Grease Monkey
Posts: 161
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Melbourne

hmmmm....

Post by jester »

I agree with ruchi bout the new technology and the " not by much win" :? heheh

Also, ive heard that the Integra has a much lighter engine.

But at the end of the day.... i think it is not How fast u drive, but HOW u drive fast...! (within limts of course! :D)

If u know your car and can drive it to its full potential u got nothing to worry bout! :wink: ( this relating to manual of course!)

Just a thought!
User avatar
GPXXX
Oldtimer
Posts: 3433
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: < the matrix >

Post by GPXXX »

nick, are you referring to the Integra Type-R? because as I understand it, the DC2R has different suspension setup (much stiffer) with LSD and lighter kerb weight hence it has better handling...

i understand the FTO's main rival is the DC2R, but since this is a thread about 'VTiR vs the FTO' I just thought we should keep the comparison relevant... 8)
User avatar
Nickname
Apprentice
Posts: 80
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by Nickname »

What I'm thinking is the Civic and Integra @ EF, EG, EK and DC2 having the 4 Double-wishbone suspension which is one of the best suspension I think.

Thant's why I said doing cornering will be a bit better than FTO.
Why they don't have 4 Double-wishbone but 2 in the new DC5 is....... the production cost, since Double-wishbone is the most expensive system to built up compare to mutile-link.... and all other type !!

This is what I think...... anyone agree ??? :roll:
User avatar
payaya
Oldtimer
Posts: 3670
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 5:00 pm

Post by payaya »

double wishbone doesnt automatically mean better, in theory yes, but in practice its a different matter.

The control link in BA falcon is suprior to the Double Wishbone step of AU falcon.

BMW dont use wishbones but manage to create a car with great handling better than most.

But the Type R has one poor ride, its terrible when road surface is poor, get all twitchy and nervous over bumps!

Anyone else notice camrys have a positive camber on the rear end? Bloody weird.
Post Reply